Physical modeling of saturation formation in the transition zone of a gas-water contact under the elastic-water drive during underground gas storage in low-permeability reservoirs operation
- 1 — Postgraduate Student Ufa State Petroleum Technological University ▪ Orcid
- 2 — Ph.D. Associate Professor Ufa State Petroleum Technological University ▪ Orcid
- 3 — Ph.D., Dr.Sci. Professor Ufa State Petroleum Technological University ▪ Orcid ▪ Scopus ▪ ResearcherID
Abstract
The growth of gas consumption associated with the Russian regions gasification requires the construction of new underground gas storages (UGS) and increase existing gas storages capacity. The creation of new underground gas storages and the expansion of existing ones involve expensive investments. The most significant items of expenditure are the costs of cushion gas injection, which is necessary to maintain reservoir pressure and UGS capacity during gas extraction period. The gas provides a “dry” region within the location of production wells and forms a transition zone at the gas-water contact under the elastic-water drive. The size of the transition zone in the area of the gas-water contact and the irreducible cushion gas volume required for its formation depend on the type of reservoir and its filtration and capacity properties. During modeling reservoir processes in cycles of gas injection and gas extraction from UGS, gas and water filtration is characterized by hysteresis of relative phase permeability (RPP) dependencies. There is also a shift for relative permeability curves when creating UGS. It has been observed in filtration processes (injection or extraction of gas) of the same flow direction. The paper presents the results of laboratory experiments on filtration modeling of counter-directional filtration flows of gas and water in a carbonate reservoir with an active aquifer in order to determine the number of cycles required to stabilize the position of the relative permeability curves and the points of residual gas and water saturation when modeling injection and production gas from UGS.
None
References
- Ermolaev A.I., Efimov S.I., Kharitonov I.P. Assessment of the Methods Application Extent for Wells Stimulation at Underground Gas Storage. Science & Technology in the Gas Industry. 2021. N 3 (87), p. 73-79 (in Russian).
- Ponomarev A.I., Vladimirov I.V., Kalinovskiy Yu.V. et al. Analytical substantiation of aquifer parameters at adjustment of a digital model simulating underground gas storages in depleted gas-condensate fields. Vesti gazovoy nauki. 2018. N 1 (33), p. 203-206 (in Russian).
- Engibaryan M.A., Povarov D.A. Increase of operating efficiency of underground gas storages, created in porous formations with active water drive system, as a part of Unified Gas Supply System. Gas Industry. 2018. N 6 (769), p. 72-77 (in Russian).
- Gaysin A.R., Shayahmetov A.I., Ponomarev A.I. et al. Features of the Formation of a Gas-Saturated Area During the Creation of an Underground Gas Storage in a Depleted Gas Reservoir in a Fractured-Pore Type Reservoir with an Active Aquifer. Georesursy. 2024. Vol. 26. N 1, p. 136-144 (in Russian). DOI: 10.18599/grs.2024.1.12
- Zhengru Yang, Shabani M., Solano N. et al. Experimental determination of gas-water relative permeability for ultra-low-permeability reservoirs using crushed-rock samples: Implications for drill cuttings characterization. Fuel. 2023. Vol. 347. N 128331. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2023.128331
- Gasumov R.A., Gasumov E.R., Minchenko Yu.S. Features of the underground storages construction in depleted oil and gas condensate fields. Journal of Mining Institute. 2020. Vol. 244, p. 418-427. DOI: 10.31897/PMI.2020.4.4
- Hamid M.A., Musa T.A., Elbaloula H.A.A. et al. Fitting Relative Permeability’s Curves Based on Laboratory Production Data for A Thermal Composite Core Flooding Experiment. Journal of Petroleum Engineering & Technology. 2019. Vol. 9. Iss. 3, p. 41-56. DOI: 10.37591/jopet.v9i3.3426
- Lysyy M., Fernø M.A., Ersland G. Effect of relative permeability hysteresis on reservoir simulation of underground hydrogen storage in an offshore aquifer. Journal of Energy Storage. 2023. Vol. 64. N 107229. DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2023.107229
- Rezaei A., Hassanpouryouzband A., Molnar I. et al. Relative Permeability of Hydrogen and Aqueous Brines in Sandstones and Carbonates at Reservoir Conditions. Geophysical Research Letters. 2022. Vol. 49. Iss. 12. DOI: 10.1029/2022GL099433
- Afzali S., Ghamartale A., Rezaei N., Zendehboudi S. Mathematical modeling and simulation of water-alternating-gas (WAG) process by incorporating capillary pressure and hysteresis effects. Fuel. 2020. Vol. 263. N 116362. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116362
- Ganguly E., Misra S. Spatiotemporal Variations in the Connectivity of Wetting and Nonwetting Phases during Water Alternating Gas Injection. Energy & Fuels. 2021. Vol. 35. Iss. 2, p. 1129-1142. DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c03170
- Drozdov N.A. Filtration studies on cores and sand packed tubes from the Urengoy field for determining the efficiency of simultaneous water and gas injection on formation when extracting condensate from low-pressure reservoirs and oil from oil rims. Journal of Mining Institute. 2022. Vol. 257, p. 783-794. DOI: 10.31897/PMI.2022.71
- Zhenkai Bo, Boon M., Hajibeygi H., Hurter S. Impact of experimentally measured relative permeability hysteresis on reservoir-scale performance of underground hydrogen storage (UHS). International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2023. Vol. 48. Iss. 36, p. 13527-13542. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.12.270
- Fatemi M., Shahrokhi O., Sohrabi M. et al. Experimental Investigation of Oil Recovery from Carbonate Reservoir Rocks Under Oil-Wet Condition: Waterflood, Gas Injection, SWAG and WAG Injections. Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference, 9-12 November 2015, Abu Dhabi, UAE, OnePetro, 2015. N SPE-177641-MS. DOI: 10.2118/177641-MS
- Afzali S., Rezaei N., Zendehboudi S. A comprehensive review on Enhanced Oil Recovery by Water Alternating Gas (WAG) injection. Fuel. 2018. Vol. 227, p. 218-246. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2018.04.015
- Higgs S., Ying Da Wang, Chenhao Sun et al. Direct measurement of hydrogen relative permeability hysteresis for underground hydrogen storage. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2024. Vol. 50. Part D, p. 524-541. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.07.270
- Sheng Peng. Gas-water relative permeability of unconventional reservoir rocks: Hysteresis and influence on production after shut-in. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering. 2020. Vol. 82. N 103511. DOI: 10.1016/j.jngse.2020.103511
- Keumarsi M.M., Mollaei R., Fatemi M. Microfluidics simulations of the importance of micro porosity on the dynamic wettability alteration of the porous media: Effects of wettability alteration scenario, mixed-wettability, flow rate and oil viscosity. Geoenergy Science and Engineering. 2025. Vol. 254. N 214034. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoen.2025.214034
- Mikhaylovskiy A.A. Application of simplified gas-hydrodynamic proxy models for real-time technological calculations aimed at gas fields and underground gas storages. Vesti gazovoy nauki. 2018. N 1 (33), p. 193-202 (in Russian).
- Zolotukhin A.B., Yazynina I.V., Shelyago E.V. Relative permeability hysteresis for oil-water system in hydrophilic rocks. Oil Industry. 2016. N 3, p. 78-80 (in Russian).
- Sinan Zhu, Junchang Sun, Guoqi Wei et al. Numerical simulation-based correction of relative permeability hysteresis in water-invaded underground gas storage during multi-cycle injection and production. Petroleum Exploration and Development. 2021. Vol. 48. Iss. 1, p. 190-200. DOI: 10.1016/S1876-3804(21)60015-0
- Troitskiy V.M., Grigoryev B.A., Rassokhin S.G. et al. Physical modelling of gas cycling during development and operation of an underground gas storage. Hysteresis of phase permeability. Vesti gazovoy nauki. 2019. N 1 (38), p. 18-28 (in Russian).
- Jinkai Wang, Jialin Fu, Jun Xie, Jieming Wang. Quantitative characterisation of gas loss and numerical simulations of underground gas storage based on gas displacement experiments performed with systems of small-core devices connected in series. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering. 2020. Vol. 81. N 103495. DOI: 10.1016/j.jngse.2020.103495
- Jinkai Wang, Xiaoyong Feng, Qiqi Wanyan et al. Hysteresis effect of three-phase fluids in the high-intensity injection–production process of sandstone underground gas storages. Energy. 2022. Vol. 242. N 123058. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.123058
- Ghanizadeh A., Chengyao Song, Clarkson C.R., Younis A. Relative permeability of tight hydrocarbon systems: An experimental study. Fuel. 2021. Vol. 294. N 119487. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119487
- Fatemi S.M., Sohrabi M. Relative permeabilities hysteresis for oil/water, gas/water and gas/oil systems in mixed-wet rocks. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering. 2018. Vol. 161, p. 559-581. DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2017.11.014
- Krasovskiy A.V., Golofast S.L., Raudanen E.V. The Effect of Dynamic Permeability the Decrease of the Drained Gas Reserves Cenomanian Deposits. SOCAR Proceedings. 2016. N 4, p. 48-54 (in Russian). DOI: 10.5510/OGP20160400297
- Kazakov K.V. Methodological issues of flow simulation during WAG and gas injection. Exposition Oil Gas. 2017. N 3 (56), p. 42-47 (in Russian).
- Zhukov V.S., Kuzmin Yu.O. Experimental evaluation of compressibility coefficients for fractures and intergranular pores of an oil and gas reservoir. Journal of Mining Institute. 2021. Vol. 251, p. 658-666. DOI: 10.31897/PMI.2021.5.5
- Dorfman M.B., Sentemov A.А., Belozerov I.P. The study of displacing ability of lignosulfonate aqueous solutions on sand packed tubes. Journal of Mining Institute. 2023. Vol. 264, p. 865-873.
- Mikhailov N.N., Tumanova E.S. Phase permeability of low-permeable collectors. Oilfield engineering. 2020. N 8 (620), p. 28-38 (in Russian). DOI: 10.30713/0207-2351-2020-8(620)-28-38
- Dmitriev N., Maksimov V., Mikhailov N., Kuzmichev A. Experimental study of filtration properties of hydrocarbons anisotropic fields. Burenie i neft. 2015. N 11, p. 6-9 (in Russian).
- Ratnikov I.B., Shulga R.S., Romanov E.A. Interpretation of research data curves capillary pressure. Mining Science and Technology. 2016. N 4, p. 24-39 (in Russian). DOI: 10.17073/2500-0632-2016-4-24-37
- Orlov D.M., Fedoseev A.P., Savchenko N.V. et al. Estimation of filtration velocity influence on relative phase permeabilities using method of unsteady filtration. Vesti gazovoy nauki. 2015. N 3 (23), p. 8-14 (in Russian).
- Stepanov A.V., Zubareva I.A., Volgin E.R. Hydrodynamic modeling of laboratory experiments related to oil displacement with thermopolymer solution. Tyumen State University Herald. Physical and Mathematical Modeling. Oil, Gas, Energy. 2022. Vol. 8. N 2 (30), p. 77-100 (in Russian). DOI: 10.21684/2411-7978-2022-8-2-77-100
- Stepanov S.V., Vokina V.R. On the question of comparability of relative phase permeabilities obtained by different methods. Tyumen State University Herald. Physical and Mathematical Modeling. Oil, Gas, Energy. 2024. Vol. 10. N 2 (38), p. 45-55 (in Russian). DOI: 10.21684/2411-7978-2024-10-2-45-55
- Galkin S.V., Kochnev A.A., Beltyukov D.A. Approximation of curves of relative phase permeabilities in creating geological and hydrodynamic models of high-viscosity oil reserves. Oilfield engineering. 2022. N 12 (648), p. 28-33 (in Russian). DOI: 10.33285/0207-2351-2022-12(648)-28-33
- Kadet V.V., Galechan A.M. Consideration of Jamin effect in a percolation model of microdispersed water-gas mixtures moving within an oil reservoir. Vesti gazovoy nauki. 2023. N 2 (54), p. 118-123 (in Russian).