Submit an Article
Become a reviewer
Vol 277
Pages:
136-145
In press

Mechanism of microcrack zone formation in rock samples of various lithological types under triaxial stress state fracture conditions

Authors:
Vladimir L. Trushko1
Mikhail D. Ilinov2
Aleksandr O. Rozanov3
Malik M. Saitgaleev4
Dmitrii N. Petrov5
Daniil A. Karmanskii6
Aleksandr A. Selikhov7
About authors
  • 1 — Ph.D., Dr.Sci. Director of Research Institute “Deep Metageology” Empress Catherine ΙΙ Saint Petersburg Mining University ▪ Orcid ▪ Scopus
  • 2 — Ph.D. Head of Laboratory Empress Catherine ΙΙ Saint Petersburg Mining University ▪ Orcid ▪ Scopus
  • 3 — Senior Researcher Empress Catherine ΙΙ Saint Petersburg Mining University ▪ Orcid
  • 4 — Leading Engineer Empress Catherine ΙΙ Saint Petersburg Mining University ▪ Orcid
  • 5 — Ph.D. Associate Professor Empress Catherine ΙΙ Saint Petersburg Mining University ▪ Orcid
  • 6 — Leading Engineer Empress Catherine ΙΙ Saint Petersburg Mining University ▪ Orcid
  • 7 — Postgraduate Student Empress Catherine ΙΙ Saint Petersburg Mining University ▪ Orcid
Date submitted:
2025-09-15
Date accepted:
2025-12-24
Online publication date:
2026-02-11

Abstract

Study of fracture mechanics in heterogeneous rocks, including crack initiation and propagation, has practical applications for geocontrol and identification of fracture zones in hydrocarbon well extraction. The features of microcrack zone formation depending on the type of rock heterogeneity under triaxial stress state conditions are considered. The research was conducted using an MTS 815 servo-hydraulic testing frame integrated with a Milne DAQ acoustic emission system (Itasca International Company, UK). The paper presents the fracture results of samples of various lithological types manufactured from cores of post-magmatic rocks. Fine-grained samples with gneissic and banded textures, as well as a coarse-grained sample with massive texture, were tested. During the tests, acoustic emission (AE) was recorded using 12 piezoceramic sensors. To describe the geometry of the fracture zone, the coordinates of AE event hypocenters were calculated, then the configuration of hypocenters distribution was analyzed using a tomography procedure (layer-by-layer construction of AE event density maps), and the angles β between the direction of the macrocrack and the axial stress σ1 were determined. To interpret the failure evolution, trends of the b-factor and AE activity were calculated, the intervals of critical behavior of which were correlated with the localization and tomography data. After testing the samples, the types of their deformation and the mechanism of destruction with the phenomenon of dilatation were revealed. It is established that for the considered types of sample inhomogeneities, various microcrack structures are formed under the same volumetric loading conditions. In fine-grained rock of gneissic texture, a linear distribution of AE hypocenters is formed, indicating the formation of microcracks along the direction of layering. For the fine-grained rock with banded texture, the hypocenter distribution is characterized by the formation of distinct clusters, reflecting areas of the most intensive fracturing. In the coarse-grained massive texture sample, a volumetric distribution of hypocenters is observed, manifesting dilatancy properties and the formation of an extensive microcrack network.

Область исследования:
Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
Keywords:
triaxial compression dilatancy microcrack acoustic emission fracture mechanism b-factor
Go to volume 277

Funding

The work was carried out within the framework of the State assignment FSRW-2024-0008.

References

  1. Tananykhin D., Korolev M., Stecyuk I., Grigorev M. An Investigation into Current Sand Control Methodologies Taking into Account Geomechanical, Field and Laboratory Data Analysis. Resources. 2021. Vol. 10. Iss. 12. N 125. DOI: 10.3390/resources10120125
  2. Zhukov V.S., Kuzmin Yu.O. Experimental evaluation of compressibility coefficients for fractures and intergranular pores of an oil and gas reservoir. Journal of Mining Institute. 2021. Vol. 251, p. 658-666. DOI: 10.31897/PMI.2021.5.5
  3. Bosikov I.I., Klyuev R.V., Gavrina O.A. Analysis of geological-geophysical materials and qualitative assessment of the oil and gas perspectives of the Yuzhno-Kharbizhinsky area (Northern Caucasus). Geology and Geophysics of Russian South. 2021. Vol. 11. N 1, p. 6-21 (in Russian). DOI: 10.46698/VNC.2021.36.47.001
  4. Petrakov D.G., Kupavykh K.S., Kupavykh A.S. Experimental study of elastic-plastic properties of oil reservoir rocks with account of saturation. Construction of oil and gas wells on land and sea. 2020. N 3 (327), p. 33-38 (in Russian). DOI: 10.33285/0130-3872-2020-3(327)-33-38
  5. Glassley W.E. Geothermal Energy. Renewable Energy and the Environment. CRC Press, 2010, p. 320. DOI: 10.1201/EBK1420075700
  6. Krumbholz J.F., Krumbholz M., Wadas S.H., Tanner D.C. Characterisation of the fracture- and karst-controlled geothermal reservoir below Munich from geophysical wireline and well information. Geothermal Energy. 2024. Vol. 12. N 9. DOI: 10.1186/s40517-024-00286-6
  7. Kashnikov Yu.A., Shustov D.V., Yakimov S.Yu. Consideration of the geomechanical state of a fractured porous reservoir in reservoir simulation modelling. Journal of Mining Institute. 2025. Vol. 271, p. 42-52.
  8. Putilov I.S., Vinokurova E.E., Guliaeva A.A. et al. Conceptual Geological Modelling based on Lithological and Petrographic Studies (The Case of the Permo-Carboniferous Deposit of the Usinskoye Field). Perm Journal of Petroleum and Mining Engineering. 2020. Vol. 20. N 3, p. 214-222 (in Russian). DOI: 10.15593/2712-8008/2020.3.2
  9. Dvoynikov M.V., Sidorkin D.I., Kunshin A.A., Kovalev D.A. Development of Hydraulic Turbodrills for Deep Well Drilling. Applied Sciences. 2021. Vol. 11. Iss. 16. N 7517. DOI: 10.3390/app11167517
  10. Kucherov V.G., Bessel V.V. Challenges and risks of deep and super deep drilling. Burenie i neft. 2020. N 3, p. 12-16 (in Russian).
  11. Protosenya A.G., Verbilo P.E., Karasev M.A. Research of the mechanical characteristics’ anisotropy of apatite-nepheline ores block rock mass. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology. 2018. Vol. 9. Iss. 11, p. 1962-1972.
  12. Trushko V.L., Protosenya A.G., Verbilo P.E. Predicting strength of pillars in fractured rock mass during development of apatite-nephelinic ores. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences. 2018. Vol. 13. N 8, p. 2864-2872.
  13. Verbilo P.E., Iovlev G.A., Belyakov N.A. Parameter selection for the Hoek-Brown model with softening of rock mass based on laboratory experiments on rock samples and discrete numerical simulations of jointed rock mass. Mining Informational and Analytical Bulletin. 2025. N 2, p. 57-77 (in Russian). DOI: 10.25018/0236_1493_2025_2_0_57
  14. Ilyinov M.D., Petrov D.N., Karmanskiy D.A., Selikhov A.A. Physical simulation aspects of structural changes in rock samples under thermobaric conditions at great depths. Mining Science and Technology. 2023. Vol. 8. N 4, p. 290-302. DOI: 10.17073/2500-0632-2023-09-150
  15. Tongwen Jiang, Wei Yao, Xiongwei Sun et al. Evolution of anisotropic permeability of fractured sandstones subjected to true-triaxial stresses during reservoir depletion. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering. 2021. Vol. 200. N 108251. DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2020.108251
  16. Kozyrev A.A., Kuznetcov N.N., Shokov A.N. Rockburst hazard assessment of hard rocks in the Zhdanovskoe deposit (Kola Peninsula). Russian Mining Industry. 2022. N 6, p. 75-82 (in Russian). DOI: 10.30686/1609-9192-2022-6-75-82
  17. Hofmann H., Babadagli T., Jeoung Seok Yoon et al. A grain based modeling study of mineralogical factors affecting strength, elastic behavior and micro fracture development during compression tests in granites. Engineering Fracture Mechanics. 2015. Vol. 147, p. 261-275. DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2015.09.008
  18. Karasev M.A., Petrushin V.V., Rysin A.I. The hybrid finite/discrete element method in description of macrostructural behavior of salt rocks. Mining Informational and Analytical Bulletin. 2023. N 4, p. 48-66 (in Russian). DOI: 10.25018/0236_1493_2023_4_0_48
  19. Dresen G., Kwiatek G., Goebel T., Ben-Zion Y. Seismic and Aseismic Preparatory Processes Before Large Stick–Slip Failure. Pure and Applied Geophysics. 2020. Vol. 177. Iss. 12, p. 5741-5760. DOI: 10.1007/s00024-020-02605-x
  20. Damaskinskaya E.E., Hilarov V.L., Nosov Yu.G. et al. Defect structure formation in quartz single crystal at the early stages of deformation. Physics of the Solid State. 2022. Vol. 64. Iss. 4, p. 451-457. DOI: 10.21883/PSS.2022.04.53500.262
  21. Hilarov V.L., Damaskinskaya E.E. Modeling of fracture and acoustic emission in pol-ycrystalline solids with the discrete elements method. Physics of the Solid State. 2022. Vol. 64. Iss. 6, p. 664-669. DOI: 10.21883/PSS.2022.06.54369.295
  22. Davidsen J., Goebel T., Kwiatek G. et al. What Controls the Presence and Characteristics of Aftershocks in Rock Fracture in the Lab? Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. 2021. Vol. 126. Iss. 10. N e2021JB022539. DOI: 10.1029/2021JB022539
  23. Sheng-Qi Yang, Jing Yang, Zong-Long Mu et al. Experimental Study on Mechanical Behavior, Fracture Characteristics, and Acoustic Emission Damage Characteristics of Sandstone Under Triaxial Multistage Stress Disturbance. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering. 2024. Vol. 57. Iss. 10, p. 8633-8655. DOI: 10.1007/s00603-024-03994-4
  24. Jianfeng Liu, Yang Wu, Junjie Liu et al. Acoustic emission evolution and fracture mechanism of rock for direct tensile failure. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Science. 2025. Vol. 185. N 105974. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2024.105974
  25. Boese C.M., Kwiatek G., Plenkers K. et al. Performance Evaluation of AE Sensors Installed Like Hydrophones in Adaptive Monitoring Networks During a Decametre-Scale Hydraulic Stimulation Experiment. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering. 2023. Vol. 56. Iss. 10, p. 6983-7001. DOI: 10.1007/s00603-023-03418-9
  26. Rasskazov M.I., Tereshkin A.A., Tsoi D. I. et al. Assessment of geomechanical behavior of rock mass by the data of seismic monitoring with acoustic sensing at rockburst-hazardous deposits. Mining Informational and Analytical Bulletin. 2021. N 12-1, p. 167-182 (in Russian). DOI: 10.25018/0236_1493_2021_121_0_167
  27. Loseva E., Lozovsky I., Zhostkov R. Refining Low Strain Pile Integrity Testing for Minor Flaw Detection with Complex Wavelet Transform. Civil Engineering Journal. 2024. Vol. 10. N 10, p. 3194-3207. DOI: 10.28991/CEJ-2024-010-10-05
  28. Shuting Miao, Peng-Zhi Pan, Arno Zang et al. Laboratory Shear Behavior of Tensile- and Shear-Induced Fractures in Sandstone: Insights from Acoustic Emission. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering. 2024. Vol. 57. Iss. 8, p. 5397-5413. DOI: 10.1007/s00603-024-03780-2
  29. Davis R.O., Selvadurai A.P.S. Plasticity and Geomechanics. Cambridge University Press, 2002. 287 p. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511614958
  30. Jie Li, Mingyang Wang, Kaiwen Xia et al. Time-dependent dilatancy for brittle rocks. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering. 2017. Vol. 9. Iss. 6, p. 1054-1070. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrmge.2017.08.002
  31. Stanchits S., Yarushina V., Sabitova A. et al. Dilatancy in Shale During a Creep Monitored by Volumetric Deformation, Acoustic Emission, and Ultrasonic Transmission Techniques. 85th EAGE Annual Conference & Exhibition. 2024. Vol. 2024, p. 5. DOI: 10.3997/2214-4609.202410540
  32. Reches Z., Lockner D.A. Nucleation and growth of faults in brittle rocks. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. 1994. Vol. 99. Iss. B9, p. 18159-18173. DOI: 10.1029/94JB00115
  33. Pollard D.D., Segall P. Theoretical displacements and stresses near fractures in rock: with applications to faults, joints, veins, dikes, and solution surfaces. Fracture Mechanics of Rock. Academic Press, 1987, p. 277-349. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-066266-1.50013-2
  34. Gutenberg B., Richter C.F. Frequency of earthquakes in California. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. 1944. Vol. 34. N 4, p. 185-188. DOI: 10.1785/BSSA0340040185
  35. Trushko V.L., Rozanov A.O., Saitgaleev M.M. et al. Acoustic emission criteria for analyzing the process of rock destruction and evaluating the formation of fractured reservoirs at great depths. Journal of Mining Institute. 2024. Vol. 269, p. 848-858.
  36. Stavrogin A.N., Protosenya A.G. Rock Deformation and Fracture Mechanics. Мoscow: Nedra, 1992, p. 224.
  37. Kozyrev A.A., Kasparyan E.V., Kuznetcov N.N., Shokov A.N. Analysis of the hard rock failure conditions in dynamic form under triaxial compression. Naukosfera. 2020. N 11 (2), p. 77-85 (in Russian). DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4309363

Similar articles

Constructed Floating Wetlands – a phytotechnology for wastewater treatment: application experience and prospects
2026 Lyubov A. Ivanova, Evgeniya A. Krasavtseva, Tamara T. Gorbacheva
Experimental modeling of diamond dissolution in kimberlite within crustal cumulative centers
2026 Anastasiya V. Kuzyura, Anna V. Spivak, Galina Yu. Kriulina
Assessment of reliability parameters for workshop power supply circuits in mining enterprises with single-transformer substations under various redundancy methods
2026 Renata M. Petrova
Physical properties of Paleozoic-Mesozoic deposits from wells in the South Barents Basin
2026 Vadim L. Ilchenko
Development of an engineering methodology for determining the standard consumption of electricity by air coolers
2026 Daria E. Filimoshina
Prospects for rare earth element mineralization in the weathering crusts developed on granite-gneisses of the Souktal Plutonic Complex (Northern Kazakhstan)
2026 Medet A. Junussov, Kamal R. Regmi, Ekaterina V. Klimova, Aleksandr V. Reznik