Submit an Article
Become a reviewer
Article
Geology

Physical properties of Paleozoic-Mesozoic deposits from wells in the South Barents Basin

Authors:
Vadim L. Ilchenko1
Igor V. Chikirev2
About authors
  • 1 — Ph.D. Senior Researcher Geological Institute of the KSC RAS ▪ Orcid
  • 2 — Ph.D. Head of Department Apatity Branch of Murmansk Arctic University ▪ Orcid
Date submitted:
2024-10-24
Date accepted:
2025-07-02
Online publication date:
2025-11-14

Abstract

The Arctic shelf zone is an important research target due to its significant hydrocarbon potential. A study of the physical properties (density, elasticity, elastic anisotropy index, specific acoustic impedance, and porosity) was conducted for core samples from six wells in the South Barents Basin: Admiralteyskaya-1, Krestovaya-1, Ludlovskaya-1, Shtokmanskaya-1, Arkticheskaya-1, and Severo-Kildinskaya-82. The sample collection consists of sandstones, siltstones, and limestones. Core analysis revealed that rocks from non-productive wells (Arkticheskaya-1, Admiralteyskaya-1, and Krestovaya-1), located in the central part of the South Barents Basin and within the Admiralty High, differ in their physical and petrographic properties from rocks in gas and gas-condensate wells (Shtokmanskaya-1, Severo-Kildinskaya-82, and Ludlovskaya-1), located near the boundaries of the South Barents Basin. Core samples from productive wells (Shtokmanskaya-1, Severo-Kildinskaya-82, Ludlovskaya-1) exhibit lower average P-wave velocities, lower specific acoustic impedance, and higher open porosity and/or elastic anisotropy index compared to non-productive wells (Arkticheskaya-1, Admiralteyskaya-1, Krestovaya-1). This combination of petrophysical parameters provides the reservoir properties of rocks prospective for hydrocarbons. The petrographic variation of the reservoir properties of the studied rocks from productive to non-productive wells is associated with a decrease in grain size and a transition from pore-filling cement to thin-film and basal cement. The sandstones from the Shtokmanskaya well have a larger grain size (0.1-0.5 mm), whereas the sandstones from the Arkticheskaya-1 and Krestovaya-1 wells are finer-grained (0.1-0.2 mm). The Shtokmanskaya-1 well is characterized by pore-filling cement, the Arkticheskaya-1 ‒ by thin-film cement, and the Krestovaya-1 ‒ by cement of the basal type. The established physical properties of sedimentary rocks, suitable for the development of productive strata, will allow for the screening out of empty areas at the preliminary stage of analyzing geophysical materials during the search for geological and tectonic structures prospective for hydrocarbon accumulations.

Область исследования:
Geology
Keywords:
Barents Sea shelf hydrocarbons wells core lithology physical properties of rocks
Online First

Funding

The work was carried out in the framework of the State contract of GI KSC RAS N FMEZ-2024-0006.

References

  1. Tectostratigraphic Atlas of the Eastern Arctic. Ed. by O.V.Petrov, M.Smelror. St. Petersburg: VSEGEI, 2020, p. 152 (in Russian).
  2. Gusev E.A. Results and prospects of geological mapping of the Arctic shelf of Russia. Journal of Mining Institute. 2022. Vol. 255, p. 290-298. DOI: 10.31897/PMI.2022.50
  3. Karev V., Kovalenko Y., Ustinov K. Directional Unloading Method is a New Approach to Enhancing Oil and Gas Well Productivity. Geomechanics of Oil and Gas Wells. Springer, 2020, p. 155-166. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-26608-0_10
  4. Dvoinikov M.V., Leusheva E.L. Modern trends in the development of hydrocarbon resources. Journal of Mining Institute. 2022. Vol. 258, p. 879-880 (in Russian).
  5. Dmitrieva D., Romasheva N. Sustainable Development of Oil and Gas Potential of the Arctic and Its Shelf Zone: The Role of Innovations. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2020. Vol. 8. Iss. 12. N 1003. DOI: 10.3390/jmse8121003
  6. Archegov V.B., Nefedov Y.V. Oil and gas exploration strategy in evaluation of fuel and energy potential of Russian Arctic shelf. Journal of Mining Institute. 2015. Vol. 212, p. 5-13 (in Russian).
  7. Innovative development vector of JSC MAGE. Ed. by G.S. Kazanin, G.I. Ivanov. St. Petersburg, 2017, p. 263 (in Russian).
  8. Shipilov E.V., Murzin R.R. Hydrocarbon fields of Russia’s West Arctic shelf: geology and distribution regularities. Geologiya nefti i gaza. 2001. N 4, p. 6-19 (in Russian).
  9. Evdokimov A.N., Smirnov A.N., Fokin V.I. Mineral resources in Arctic islands of Russia. Journal of Mining Institute. 2015. Vol. 216, p. 5-12 (in Russian).
  10. Prischepa O., Nefedov Y., Nikiforova V. Arctic Shelf Oil and Gas Prospects from Lower-Middle Paleozoic Sediments of the Timan-Pechora Oil and Gas Province Based on the Results of a Regional Study. Resources. 2022. Vol. 11. Iss. 1. N 3. DOI: 10.3390/resources11010003
  11. Margulis E.A. Factors of forming the unique Shtokman-Ludlov knot of gas accumulation in the Barents Sea. Neftegazovaya Geologiya. Teoriya i praktika. 2008. Vol. 3. N 2, p. 9 (in Russian).
  12. Shipilov E.V. Hydrocarbons fields of the Russian Arctic shelf: Geology and regularities of the disposal. Vestnik of MSTU. 2000. Vol. 3. N 2, p. 339-351 (in Russian).
  13. Tsybulya L.A., Levashkevich V.G. Thermal field of the Barents Sea region. Apatity: Kolskii nauchnyi tsentr RAN, 1992, p. 112 (in Russian).
  14. Ilchenko V.L. Fission tracks analysis to determine the paleotemperature regime of the Barents Sea sediments. Litologiya i poleznye iskopaemye. 1995. N 5, p. 552-557 (in Russian).
  15. Ilchenko V.L., Chikirev I.V. Some Physical Properties of Cretaceous Rocks in the Southwestern Part of the Kara Sea Shelf. Lithology and Mineral Resources. 2009. Vol. 44. N 4, p. 328-338. DOI: 10.1134/S0024490209040026
  16. Drozdov A., Gorbyleva Y., Drozdov N., Gorelkina E. Perspectives of application of simultaneous water and gas injection for utilizing associated petroleum gas and enhancing oil recovery in the Arctic fields. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2021. Vol. 678. N 012039. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/678/1/012039
  17. Kozhevnikov E.V., Turbakov M.S., Riabokon E.P., Poplygin V.V. Effect of Effective Pressure on the Permeability of Rocks Based on Well Testing Results. Energies. 2021. Vol. 14. Iss. 8. N 2306. DOI: 10.3390/en14082306
  18. Dasgupta T., Mukherjee S. Sediment Compaction and Applications in Petroleum Geoscience. Springer, 2020, p. 122. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-13442-6
  19. Zhukov V.S., Kuzmin Yu.O. Experimental evaluation of compressibility coefficients for fractures and intergranular pores of an oil and gas reservoir. Journal of Mining Institute. 2021. Vol. 251, p. 658-666. DOI: 10.31897/PMI.2021.5.5
  20. Belozerov I.P., Gubaidullin M.G. Concept of technology for determining the permeability and porosity properties of terrigenous reservoirs on a digital rock sample model. Journal of Mining Institute. 2020. Vol. 244, p. 402-407. DOI: 10.31897/PMI.2020.4.2
  21. Kozlovsky Y.A. The Superdeep Well of the Kola Peninsula. Springer-Verlag, 1987, p. 571. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-71137-4
  22. Baker R.O., Yarranton H.W., Jensen J.L. Practical Reservoir Engineering and Characterization. Elsevier, 2015, p. 534. DOI: 10.1016/C2011-0-05566-7
  23. Peng Xiang, Hongguang Ji, Jingming Geng, Yiwei Zhao. Characteristics and Mechanical Mechanism of In Situ Unloading Damage and Core Discing in Deep Rock Mass of Metal Mine. Shock and Vibration. 2022. Vol. 2022. N 5147868. DOI: 10.1155/2022/5147868
  24. Sakulina T.S., Roslov Yu.V., Ivanova N.M. Deep seismic investigations in the Barents and Kara seas. Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth. 2003. Vol. 39. N 6, p. 438-452.
  25. Systematics and classification of sedimentary rocks and their analogues. Ed. by V.N.Shvanov. St. Petersburg: Nedra, 1998, p. 352 (in Russian).
  26. Yang Gao, Zhizhang Wang, Yuanqi She et al. Mineral characteristic of rocks and its impact on the reservoir quality of He 8 tight sandstone of Tianhuan area, Ordos Basin, China. Journal of Natural Gas Geoscience. 2019. Vol. 4. Iss. 4, p. 205-214. DOI: 10.1016/j.jnggs.2019.07.001
  27. Barletta A. Fluid Flow in Porous Media. Routes to Absolute Instability in Porous Media. Springer, 2019, p. 121-133. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-06194-4_6
  28. Kozlov S.A. Engineering geology of the Western Arctic shelf of Russia. St. Petersburg: VNIIOkeangeologiya, 2004, p. 147 (in Russian).
  29. Artyushkov E.V. On the origin of the seismic anisotropy of the lithosphere. Geophysical Journal International. 1984. Vol. 76. Iss. 1, p. 173-178. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.1984.tb05033.x
  30. Gusev E.A., Krylov A.A., Urvantsev D.M. et al. Geological structure of the northern part of the Kara Shelf near the Severnaya Zemlya archipelago according to recent studies. Journal of Mining Institute. 2020. Vol. 245, p. 505-512. DOI: 10.31897/PMI.2020.5.1
  31. Lavrenova E.A., Shcherbina Yu.V., Mamedov R.A. Modeling of hydrocarbon systems and quantitative assessment of the hydrocarbon potential of Eastern Arctic seas. Proceedings of higher educational establishments. Geology and Exploration. 2020. Vol. 63. N 4, p. 23-38 (in Russian). DOI: 10.32454/0016-7762-2020-63-4-23-38
  32. Belonovskaya L.G., Bulach M.H., Gmid L.P. The role of fracture in the formation of capacitive-filtration space of complex reservoirs. Neftegazovaya Geologiya. Teoriya i praktika. 2007. Vol. 2, p. 18 (in Russian).
  33. Smirnova N.V. Types of cement and their effect on the permeability of sandy rocks. Geologiya nefti i gaza. 1959. N 7, p. 33-38 (in Russian).
  34. Samylovskaya E., Makhovikov A., Lutonin A. et al. Digital Technologies in Arctic Oil and Gas Resources Extraction: Global Trends and Russian Experience. Resources. 2022. Vol. 11. Iss. 3. N 29. DOI: 10.3390/resources11030029
  35. Esiri A.E., Jambol D.D., Ozowe C. Enhancing reservoir characterization with integrated petrophysical analysis and geostatistical methods. Open Access Research Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies. 2024. Vol. 7. Iss. 2, p. 168-179. DOI: 10.53022/oarjms.2024.7.2.0038

Similar articles

Early-Middle Devonian ore-bearing volcanogenic formations of the Zmeinogorsky Ore District, NW Rudny Altai
2025 Maksim L. Kuibida, Ilya V. Vikentev, Nikolai N. Kruk, Oleg V. Murzin, Natalya M. Murzina, Andrei V. Chugaev, Vladislav A. Yakovlev, Yaroslav Yu. Shelepov, Anna V. Naryzhnova, Pavel A. Fominykh, Evgenii D. Zyukov, Gleb F. Karmanov
Prospects for rare earth element mineralization in the weathering crusts developed on granite-gneisses of the Souktal Plutonic Complex (Northern Kazakhstan)
2025 Medet A. Junussov, Kamal R. Regmi, Ekaterina V. Klimova, Aleksandr V. Reznik
Hydrochemical evolution of groundwater as a result of 10-year development of apatite-nepheline ore deposit in the southeastern part of the Khibiny alkaline massif
2025 Vladimir A. Dauvalter, Margarita V. Dauvalter, Zakhar I. Slukovskii
Development of complex system of geotechnical monitoring of technogenic objects based on geospatial data
2025 Viktoriya V. Kazantseva, Dmitrii S. Ozhigin, Nikolai S. Kosarev, Asel K. Satbergenova, Svetlana B. Ozhigina
Search of the Nash equilibrium for a system of two interconnected raw materials and products markets
2025 Anton A. Meshcheryakov, Oleg O. Khamisov
Development of an engineering methodology for determining the standard consumption of electricity by air coolers
2025 Daria E. Filimoshina