Submit an Article
Become a reviewer
Vol 243
Pages:
313-318
Download volume:
RUS ENG

Improving the geological and hydrodynamic model of a carbonate oil object by taking into account the permeability anisotropy parameter

Authors:
Dmitry A. Martyushev
About authors
  • Ph.D. Associate Professor Perm National Research Polytechnic University
Date submitted:
2020-06-11
Date accepted:
2020-06-11
Date published:
2020-06-30

Abstract

Significant share of the developed oil assets related to carbonate complex-built objects has formidably increased in Russia, including the Perm Region. Reliable knowledge of the parameters for the cavern-pore type of the reservoir allows clarifying the existing geological and hydrodynamic models (GHM), selecting a rational development system, regulating the development processes and providing optimal geological and technical measures for this formation. In the construction and adaptation of GHM for oil fields, especially those related to complex-built carbonate reservoirs, knowledge of both horizontal and vertical permeability (anisotropy parameter) is important. When creating GHM of carbonate objects in Perm Region deposits, vertical permeability is often taken to be zero, although this is far from being the case. Determining the vertical permeability (anisotropy parameter), its dynamics when changing the formation and bottomhole pressures and using it in GHM is an urgent task that will improve the quality and reliability of using digital models to calculate and predict the oil production process. Article describes the methodology for determining permeability anisotropy according to the interpretation of hydrodynamic investigations of wells. Proposed methodology for determining the anisotropy parameter processed the results of more than 200 studies conducted on production and injection wells of the Famennian deposit at the Gagarinskoye field. For each lithological-facies zone, dependence of the permeability anisotropy index on the bottomhole pressure is constructed. To predict and evaluate the effectiveness of the applied geological and technical measures and technological development indicators, author modified the geological and hydrodynamic model taking into account the obtained dependencies on the change in the anisotropy parameter. Using a modified hydrodynamic model, it was possible to significantly improve the adaptation of both production and injection wells. Thus, the quality and reliability of the digital model of the Famennian deposit at the Gagarinskoye field for calculating and predicting the oil production process has improved.

Keywords:
vertical permeability horizontal permeability permeability anisotropy parameter complex-built carbonate deposit modified geological and hydrodynamic model
10.31897/pmi.2020.3.313
Go to volume 243

References

  1. Abrosimov A.A., Shelyago E.V., Yazynina I.V. Justification of representative data volume of porosity and permeability properties for obtaining statistically reliable petrophysical connections. Zapiski Gornogo instituta. 2018. Vol. 233, p. 487-491. DOI: 10.31897/PMI.2018.5.487
  2. Begma D.S., Belkina V.A. Lithological-facies features of the Upper Jurassic field T. structure. Izvestiya Tomskogo politekhnicheskogo universiteta. Inzhiniring georesursov. 2017. Vol. 328. N 1, p. 109-122 (in Russian).
  3. Bozhenyuk N.N., Belkina V.A., Strekalov A.V. Geological model of the Vikulov deposits, taking into account the analysis of reservoir connectivity and data on horizontal wells. Izvestiya Tomskogo politekhnicheskogo universiteta. Inzhiniring georesursov. 2017. Vol. 329. N 4, p. 30-44 (in Russian).
  4. Galkin V.I., Ponomareva I.N., Repina V.A. Study of oil recovery in reservoirs of various types of cavities using multivariate statistical analysis. Vestnik Permskogo natsionalnogo issledovatelskogo politekhnicheskogo universiteta. Geologiya. Neftegazovoe i gornoe delo. 2016. Vol. 15. N 19, p. 145-154. DOI: 10.15593/2224-9923/2016.19.5 (in Russian).
  5. Kashnikov Yu.A., Gladyshev S.V., Razyapov R.K., Kontorovich A.A., Krasilnikova N.B. Hydrodynamic modeling of the development priority area at the Yurubcheno-Tokhomskoye field taking into account the geomechanical effect of crack closure. Neftyanoe khozyaistvo. 2011. N 4, p. 104-107 (in Russian).
  6. Kudryashova D.A. Use of probable-statistical methods to determine the sources of watering of candidate wells for water isolation operations (on the example of the Visean object at the Perm Territory field). Vestnik Permskogo natsionalnogo issledovatelskogo politekhnicheskogo universiteta. Geologiya. Neftegazovoe i gornoe delo. 2018. Vol. 17. N 1, p. 26-36 (in Russian).
  7. Martyushev D.A., Zaitsev R.A. Influence of petrophysical parameters of reefogenic carbonate reservoirs at oil fields of the Tournais-Famennian deposits of the Upper Prikamye on the productivity of production wells. Izvestiya Tomskogo politekhnicheskogo universiteta. Inzhiniring georesursov. 2019. Vol. 330. N 11, p. 77-85. DOI: 10.18799/24131830/ 2019/11/2350 (in Russian).
  8. Sayakhutdinov A.I., Kondrateva N.R., Gallyamova D.Ch., Karachurina E.V., Bulatova E.S. Hydrodynamic modeling technique for complex carbonate cavern reservoirs using the example of the Mancharovskoye field. Neftyanoe khozyaistvo. 2014. N 2, p. 114-115 (in Russian).
  9. Cherepanov S.S., Martyushev D.A., Ponomareva I.N., Khizhnyak G.P. Estimation of the permeability anisotropy of carbonate reservoirs by pressure recovery curves. Neftyanoe khozyaistvo. 2013. N 4, p. 60-61 (in Russian).
  10. Repina V.A., Galkin V.I., Galkin S.V. Complex petrophysical correction in the adaptation of geological hydrodynamic models (on the example of Visean pool of Gondyrev oil field). Zapiski Gornogo instituta. 2018. Vol. 231, p. 268-274. DOI: 10.25515/PMI.2018.3.268
  11. Khramchenkov M.G., Korolev E.A. Dynamics of the cracks development in oil-saturated carbonate formations of the Bashkir layer in the Republic of Tatarstan. Neftyanoe khozyaistvo. 2017. N 4, p. 54-57 (in Russian).
  12. Tsagan-Mandzhiev T.N. Improving the reliability of determining the vertical permeability of the formation according to hydrodynamic investigations. Gazovaya promyshlennost. 2012. N 5, p. 19-23 (in Russian).
  13. Cherepanov S.S., Chumakov G.N., Galkin S.V. Possibilities of accounting for caverns of reservoirs during geological and hydrodynamic modeling of deposits development with water flooding. Neftepromyslovoe delo. 2016. N 8, p. 5-8 (in Russian).
  14. Guerriero V., Mazzoli S., Iannace A., Vitale S., Strauss C. A permeability model for naturally fractured carbonate reservoirs. Marine and petroleum geology. 2013. Vol. 40, p. 115-134. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2012.11.002
  15. Litvinenko V. Advancement of geomechanics and geodynamics at the mineral ore mining and underground space development. Geomechanics and Geodynamics of Rock Masses. International European Rock Mechanics Symposium. EUROCK 2018. Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation, 22 May 2018. Taylor and Francis Group, London, UK. 2018. Vol.1, p. 3-16.
  16. Menezes F.F. Anisotropy of volume change and permeability evolution of hard sandstones under triaxial stress conditions. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering. 2019. Vol. 174, p. 921-939. DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2018.11.079
  17. Noirot M., Massonnat G., Jourde H. On the use of Wireline Formation testing (WFT) data: 2. Consequences of permeability anisotropy and heterogeneity on the WFT responses inferred flow modeling. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering. 2015. Vol. 133. P. 776-784. DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2013.08.055
  18. Zhang W., Wang Q. Permeability anisotropy and gas slippage of shales from the Sichuan Basin in South China. International Journal of Coal Geology. 2018. Vol. 194. p. 22-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.coal.2018.05.004

Similar articles

Mathematical model of the liquefied methane phase transition in the cryogenic tank of a vehicle
2020 Otari N. Didmanidze, Alexander S. Afanasev, Ramil T. Khakimov
Methods for assessing the technical compatibility of heterogeneous elements within a technical system
2020 Sergey A. Vasin, Alexander S. Vasilev, Elena V. Plahotnikova
Features of permeability anisotropy accounting in the hydrodynamic model
2020 Roman I. Yermekov, Vitaly P. Merkulov, Oksana S. Chernova, Mikhail O. Korovin
The age of mineralization of Mayskoe gold ore deposit (Central Chukotka): results of Re-Os isotopic dating
2020 Dmitry S. Artemiev, Robert Sh. Krymsky, Boris V. Belyatsky, Dmitry S. Ashikhmin
Description of steady inflow of fluid to wells with different configurations and various partial drilling-in
2020 Valery A. Iktissanov
Management of hardening mixtures properties when stowing mining sites of ore deposits
2020 Vladimir I. Golik, Yury V. Dmitrak, Vitaly I. Komashchenko, Nikolay M. Kachurin