Submit an Article
Become a reviewer
Vol 243
Pages:
266
Download volume:

The age of mineralization of Mayskoe gold ore deposit (Central Chukotka): results of Re-Os isotopic dating

Authors:
Dmitry S. Artemiev1
Robert Sh. Krymsky2
Boris V. Belyatsky3
Dmitry S. Ashikhmin4
About authors
  • 1 — Ph.D. Leading Geologist A.P.Karpinsky Russian Geological Research Institute
  • 2 — Head of Department A.P.Karpinsky Russian Geological Research Institute
  • 3 — Leading Engineer A.P.Karpinsky Russian Geological Research Institute
  • 4 — Geologist of the I Category A.P.Karpinsky Russian Geological Research Institute
Date submitted:
2020-05-28
Date accepted:
2020-05-28
Date published:
2020-06-30

Abstract

The article presents the results of the sulfide mineralization dating of the Mayskoe gold ore deposit using the Re-Os isotope system and isochron age estimation method of the main sulfide minerals: arsenopyrite, pyrite, and antimonite. The complex multistage formation of the studied sulfides, as well as the close intergrowths of genetically different mineral phases, did not allow obtaining a single rhenium-osmium isochron corresponding to the formation time of sulfide mineralization. Isochrones for single minerals, collected from each sulfide sample, turned out to be the result of isotopically distinct components mixture (radiogenic crustal and non-radiogenic mantle) and do not make sense from the geochronological point of view. In terms of geology, the most significant result of the study is an age estimation of 128.8 ± 4.4 Ma, obtained for the sulfide mineralization of Mayskoe deposit using Re-Os isotope dating of single fractions of pyrite and antimonite of the ore mineralization stage. While arsenopyrite is most closely associated with gold mineralization, one of the arsenopyrite varieties corrodes framboidal pyrite of the pre-ore stage, has a maximum of the crust component in the osmium isotopic composition and forms a mixing line in the isochron diagram with an apparent formation age of 458 ± 18 Ma. The initial osmium isotopic composition of the studied sulfides indicates a mixed mantle-crust source of sulfide mineralization. The issue of simultaneous ore genesis and granitoid magmatism in the Mayskoe deposit remained unresolved (the age of granitoids according to the U-Pb zircon system is 108 Ma). However, a possible solution could be the further determination of the Re-Os isochron age of the ore mineralization sulphides from the single paragenesis of a specific sample containing both arsenopyrite and pyrite (+ antimonite) with gold.

Keywords:
Central Chukotka Re-Os isotopic dating Cretaceous magmatism age of mineralization ore body
10.31897/pmi.2020.3.266
Go to volume 243

References

  1. Artemiev D.S. Granitoids of the Mayskoe gold ore cluster (Central Chukotka). Regionalnaya geologiya i metallogeniya. 2017. N 69, p. 107-121 (in Russian).
  2. Artemiev D.S. Features of the geological structure and vertical zoning of ore bodies of the Mayskoe gold ore deposit (Central Chukotka). Regionalnaya geologiya i metallogeniya. 2015. N 64, p. 94-100 (in Russian).
  3. Volkov A.V., Goncharov V.I., Sidorov A.A.Gold and silver deposits of Chukotka. Мoscow: Institut geologii rudnykh mestorozhdenii, petrografii, mineralogii i geokhimii RAN; Magadan: Severo-Vostochnyi kompleksnyi nauchno-issledovatelskii institut Dalnevostochnogo otdeleniya RAN, 2006, p. 221 (in Russian).
  4. Gusev A.I. Petrology of gold-forming magmatism. Мoscow: Akademiya Estestvoznaniya, 2012. URL:www. monographies. ru/ru/book/view?id=165 (date of access 23.05.2019) (in Russian).
  5. Volkov A.V., Sidorov A.A., Goncharov V.I., Sidorov V.A. Gold-sulfide deposits of disseminated ores in the North-East of Russia. Geologiya rudnykh mestorozhdenii. 2002. Vol. 44. N 3, p. 179-197 (in Russian).
  6. Bushmin S.A., Belyatskii B.V., Krymskii R.Sh., Glebovitskii V.A., Buiko A.K., Savva E.V., Sergeev S.A. Isochronal Re-Os age of gold from vein gold-quartz Mayskoe deposit (North Karelia, Baltic Shield). Doklady Akademii nauk. 2013. Vol. 448. N 1, p. 76-79. DOI: 10.7868/S0869565213010192 (in Russian).
  7. Konstantinov M.M. Gold ore provinces of the world. Мoscow: Nauchnyi mir, 2006, p. 358 (in Russian).
  8. Litvinenko V.S., Sergeev I. B. Innovations as a Factor in the Development of the Natural Resources Sector. Studies on Russian Economic Development. 2019.Vol. 30. P. 637-645. DOI: 10.1134/S107570071906011X
  9. Bortnikov N.S., Bryzgalov I.A., Krivitskaya N.N., Prokofev V.Yu., Vikenteva O.V. Mayskoe multistage vein-disseminated gold-sulfide deposit (Chukotka, Russia): mineralogy, fluid inclusions, stable isotopes (O and S), history and conditions of formation. Geologiya rudnykh mestorozhdenii. 2004. Vol. 46. N 6, p. 475-509 (in Russian).
  10. Luchitskaya M.V., Sergeev S.A., Sokolov S.D., Tuchkova M.I. Neoproterozoic granitoids of Wrangel Island. Doklady Akademii nauk. 2016. Vol. 469. N 2, p. 195-198. DOI: 10.7868/S0869565216200160 (in Russian).
  11. Kosko M.K., Avdyunichev V.V., Ganelin V.G., Opekunov A.Yu., Opekunova M.G., Sesil M.P., Smirnov A.N., Ushakov V.I., Khandozhko N.V., Kharrison Dzh.K., Shulga Yu.D.Wrangel Island: geological structure, mineralogy, geoecology. St. Petersburg: VNIIOkeangeologiya, 2003, p. 137 (in Russian).
  12. Luchitskaya M.V., Sokolov S.D., Kotov A.B., Natapov L.M., Belousova E.A., Katkov S.M. Late Paleozoic granitoids of Chukotka: compositional features and position in the structure of the Russian Arctic region. Geotektonika. 2015. N 4, p. 3-29. DOI: 10.7868/S0016853X15040050 (in Russian).
  13. Tibilov I.V., Milov A.P., Davydov I.A. On the pre-Mesozoic granitoid magmatism in Chukotka. Tikhookeanskaya geologiya. 1986. N 4, p. 95-98 (in Russian).
  14. Tikhomirov P.L., Luchitskaya M.V. Cretaceous granitoids of Northeast Asia: geochemistry, composition of rock-forming minerals and formation conditions. Article 1. Geology, petrography and geochemistry. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Seriya 4. Geologiya. 2006. N 5, p. 13-20 (in Russian).
  15. Tikhomirov P.L., Luchitskaya M.V., Shats A.L. The age of granitoid plutons of Northern Chukotka: status of the issue and new SHRIMP U-Pb zircon dating. Doklady Akademii nauk. 2011. Vol. 440. N 4, p. 507-510 (in Russian).
  16. For G. Fundamentals of Isotope Geology: Per. s angl. Мoscow: Mir, 1989, p. 590 (in Russian).
  17. Amato J.M., Aleinikoff J.N., Akinin V.V., McClelland W.C., Toror J. Age, chemistry, and correlations of Neoproterozoic-Devonian igneous rocks of the Arctic Alaska-Chukotka terrane: An overview with new U-Pb ages. The Geological Society of America. Special Paper. 2014. Vol. 506, p. 29-57. DOI: 10.1130/2014.2506(02)
  18. Allegre C.J., Luck J.-M. Osmium isotopes as petrogenetic and geological tracers. Earth and Planetary Science Letters. 1980. Vol. 48. Iss. 1, p. 148-154. DOI: 10.1016/0012-821X(80)90177-6
  19. Kirk J., Ruiz J., Chesley J., Walshe J., England G. A Major Archean, Gold- and Crust-Forming Event in the Kaapvaal Craton, South Africa. Science. 2002. Vol. 297(5588), p. 1856-1858. DOI: 10.1126/science.1075270
  20. Birck J.L., Barman M.R., Capmas F. Re-Os isotopic measurements at the femtomole level in natural samples. Geostandards Newsletter. 1997. Vol. 21. N 1, p. 19-27. DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-908X.1997.tb00528.x
  21. Carlson R.W. Application of the Pt-Re-Os isotopic systems to mantle geochemistry and geochronology. Lithos. 2005. Vol. 82. Iss. 3-4, p. 249-272. DOI: 10.1016/j.lithos.2004.08.003
  22. Akinin V.V., Miller E.L., Gottlieb E., Polzunenkov G.O. Geochronology and geochemistry of Cretaceous magmatic rocks of Arctic Chukotka: An update of GEOCHRON2.0. European Geological Union General Assembly 2012, 22-27 April, 2012, Vienna, Austria, p. 3876. 2012EGUGA.14.3876A
  23. Browning P., Groves D.I., Blockley J.G., Rosman K.J.R. Lead isotope constraints on the age and source of gold mineralization in the Archean Yilgarn Block, Western Australia. Economic Geology. 1987. Vol. 82. N 4, p. 971-986. DOI: 10.2113/gsecongeo.82.4.971
  24. Cecile M.P., Harrison J.C., Kosko M.K., Parrish R.R. Precambrian U-Pb ages of igneous rocks, Wrangel Complex, Wrangel Island, U.S.S.R. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences. 1991. Vol. 28 (9), p. 1340-1348. DOI: 10.1139/e91-117
  25. Whitney D.L., Evans B.W. Abbreviations for names of rock-forming minerals. American Mineralogist. 2010. Vol. 95, р. 185-187. DOI: 10.2138/am.2010.3371

Similar articles

Mathematical model of the liquefied methane phase transition in the cryogenic tank of a vehicle
2020 Otari N. Didmanidze, Alexander S. Afanasev, Ramil T. Khakimov
Revisiting the evolution of deformation zones under platform conditions in the case study of the Kungur Ice Cave (Cis-Urals)
2020 Nataliya V. Lavrova
Geochemical approach in assessing the technogenic impact on soils
2020 Galina I. Sarapulova
Deep structure and geodynamic conditions of granitoid magmatism in the Eastern Russia
2020 Viktor I. Alekseev
Multi-terminal dc grid overall control with modular multilevel converters
2020 Miguel Jiménez Carrizosa, Nikola Stankovic, Jean-Claude Vannier, Yaroslav E. Shklyarskiy, Aleksei I. Bardanov
Justification of stripping and development of a modular mine site for a combined coal mining method in Kuzbass on the example Baikaimskaya mine site
2020 Roman I. Shishkov, Valerii A. Fedorin