Submit an Article
Become a reviewer
Vol 238
Pages:
465
Download volume:
RUS ENG

Actual and Forecast Impact Assessment of Earthquakes on the Global Economic System

Authors:
T. P. Skufina1
S. V. Baranov2
V. P. Samarina3
About authors
  • 1 — Federal Research Centre «Kola Science Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences»
  • 2 — Kola Branch Federal Research Centre of «Geophysical Survey of Russian Academy of Sciences»
  • 3 — Federal Research Centre «Kola Science Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences»
Date submitted:
2019-03-21
Date accepted:
2019-04-30
Date published:
2019-08-25

Abstract

Problem of strong earthquakes impact on the global economic system is considered. Geoscientists suggest that increase in Earth's seismicity is highly unlikely, but experts in economic geography say that existing facts indicate increase in seismic risk for economic systems. Using the example of an earthquake in the Tahoku region (Japan, 2011), a comprehensive assessment of economic consequences of a strong earthquake is presented as a part of analysis of three blocks of statistical information: 1) macroeconomic indicators of Japan; 2) stock market indicators; 3) industry indicators of the global economy. Results of the assessment pointed to a new feature of strong earthquakes effects in economically developed regions of the world: globalization processes are spreading regional effects of large earthquakes throughout the world economic system. To understand the magnitude of strong earthquakes problem, estimate of world economy loss from a probable earthquake near the United States, similar to Tahoku, is given. It was established that economic losses would be 2.6 times greater: a drop in the global S&P Global 1200 index would be about 15 %. The farther in time this probable earthquake protects from the Tahoku earthquake, the more globalization will increase losses.

10.31897/pmi.2019.4.465
Go to volume 238

References

  1. Baranov S.V., Skufina T.P. Earthquake 11.03.2011 near the east coast of Japan: implications for the global economy (according to statistics). Voprosyi statistiki. 2011. N 11, p. 64-71 (in Russian).
  2. Botvina L.R., Shebalin P.N., Oparina I.B. The mechanism of temporal variation of seismicity and acoustic emission before macro-destruction. Dokladyi RAN. 2001. N 4 (37), p. 480-484 (in Russian).
  3. Voronets V.V., Saharov O.A., Uzdin A.M. Estimation of statistical characteristics of economic seismic risk. Seysmostoykoe stroitelstvo. Bezopasnost sooruzheniy. 2000. N 2, p. 6-8 (in Russian).
  4. Zonenshayn L.P., Kuzmin M.I. Paleogeodinamika. Moscow: Nauka, 1993, p. 192 (in Russian).
  5. Karlovich I.A., Karlovich I.E., Karlovich A.I. The role of natural cataclysms and technogenic litogennogo recovery material in nature. Zapiski Gornogo instituta. 2013. Vol. 203, p. 46-49 (in Russian).
  6. Lodus E.V., Goncharov E.V. Physical modeling of energy transfer in rock massif. Zapiski Gornogo instituta. 2010. Vol. 185, p. 64-67 (in Russian).
  7. Molchan G.M. Optimum strategies in forecasting earthquakes. Modern methods of interpretation of seismological data. Vyichislitelnaya seysmologiya. 1991. N 24, p. 3-19 (in Russian).
  8. Osipov V.I. Geoecology is an interdisciplinary science on ecological problems of geospheres. Geoekologiya. 1993. N 1, p. 4-18 (in Russian).
  9. Petuhov A.V. Geodynamic model formation of hydrogen sulphide in natural gases and materials during pulse compression rocks during earthquakes. Zapiski Gornogo instituta. 2010. Vol. 188, p. 189-194 (in Russian).
  10. Samarina V.P., Skufin P.K. Market problems in assessing the impact of changes in the geological environment on local global economic processes. Klasterny`e iniciativy` v formirovanii progressivnoj struktury` nacional`noj e`konomiki: Sbornik nauchny`x trudov 4-j Mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii, Yugo-Zapadnyy gosudarstvennyy universitet. Kursk. 2018, р. 254-257 (in Russian).
  11. Sobolev G.A., Ponomarev A.V. Physics of earthquakes and harbingers. Moscow: Nauka, 2003, p. 270 (in Russian).
  12. Allen C. R. Responsibilities in earthquake prediction. Bulletin Seismological Society of America. 1976. N 66, p. 2069-2074.
  13. Baranov S.V. The aftershock process of the February 21, 2008 Storfjorden strait, Spitsbergen, earthquake. Journal of Volcanology and Seismology. 2013. N 3 (7), p. 230-242.
  14. Baranov S.V., Skufina T.P. Economic Consequences of Tahoku Earthquake of March 11, 2011 in Japan. Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture. 2014. N 1 (8), p. 29-36.
  15. Cavallo E. Catastrophic natural disasters and economic growth. Review of Economics and Statistics. 2013. N 5 (95), p. 1549-1561.
  16. Climate I. Mitigating the impact of tsunami debris on coastlines. IPRC Climate: Newsletter of the International Pacific Research Center. 2011, p. 26-28.
  17. Cooper W.H., Donnelly J.M., Johnson R. Japan’s 2011 earthquake and tsunami: economic effects and implications for the united states. Analysis. 2011. N 11, p. 34.
  18. Ghaderi Z., Henderson J.C. Japanese tsunami debris and the threat to sustainable tourism in the Hawaiian Islands. Tourism Management Perspectives. 2013. N 8, p. 98-105.
  19. Helmstetter A., Sornette D. Sub-critical and supercritical regimes in epidemic models of earthquake aftershocks. Journal of Geophysical Research. 2002. N 107 (B10), p. 22-37. DOI: 10.1029/2001JB001580
  20. Henriet F., Hallegatte S., Tabourier L. Firm-network characteristics and economic robustness to natural disasters. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control. 2012. N 1 (36), p. 150-167.
  21. Institute For Supply Management – ISM. Retrieved from http://www.investopedia.com/terms/i/institute-for-supply-management.asp (date of access 3.11.2018).
  22. Komatsu G. Effects of tsunami wave erosion on natural landscapes: examples from the 2011 Tohoku-oki Tsunami. Tsunami Events and Lessons Learned. Netherlands, Dordrecht: Springer, 2014, p. 243-253.
  23. Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry of Japan. Retrieved from http://www.meti.go.jp/english/statistics/index.html (date of access 3.11.2018).
  24. Morita K., Nagai Y. Japan Economic Focus, Economic implications of earthquake. Barclays Capital, Japan Economic Research. Tokyo: Hongo, Bunkyō, 2011, p. 21.
  25. Search Earthquake Archives. Retrieved from http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/search/ (date of access 3.12.2018).
  26. Samarina V.P., Skufina T.P, Baranov S.V. Power Efficiency of Russia’s Economy: Problems of the Estimation and Increasing Directions. Actual Problems of Economics. 2015. N 11 (173), p. 127-136.
  27. Skufina T., Baranov S., Samarina V. The influence of strong earthquakes on the global economy: facts and assessment. International Journal of Ecological Economics and Statistics. 2017. Vol. 38. Iss. 4, р. 108-114.
  28. Standard & Poor's. Retrieved from http://www.standardandpoors.com/indices/main/en/eu (date of access 3.11.2018).
  29. Kossobokov V.G., Romashkova L.L., Keilis-Borok V.I., Healy J.H. Testing earthquake prediction algorithms: Statistically significant advance prediction of the largest earthquakes in the Circum-Pacific 1992-1997. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors. 1999. N 111, p. 187-196.
  30. The Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. Retrieved from https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/JPNRGDPEXP (date of access 3.11.2018).

Similar articles

Spatial Models Developed Using Laser Scanning at Gas Condensate Fields in the Northern Construction-Climatic Zone
2019 S. N. Menshikov, A. A. Dzhaljabov, G. G. Vasiliev, I. A. Leonovich, O. M. Ermilov
Estimation Method for Vector Field Divergence of Earth Crust Deformations in the Process of Mineral Deposits Development
2019 B. T. Mazurov, M. G. Mustafin, A. A. Panzhin
Engineering of Complex Structure Apatite Deposits and Excavating-Sorting Equipment for Its Implementation
2019 A. Yu. Cheban
Impact of External Factors on National Energy Security
2019 V. L. Ulanov, E. Yu. Ulanova
Modern Mathematical Forecast Methods of Maintenance and Support Conditions for Mining Tunnel
2019 S. A. Ignatyev, A. E. Sudarikov, A. Zh. Imashev
Calculation of Oil-saturated Sand Soils’ Heat Conductivity
2019 J. Sobota, V. I. Malarev, A. V. Kopteva