Submit an Article
Become a reviewer
Vol 194
Pages:
128-131
Download volume:
RUS
Article

Characteristics of 2D- and 3D-potential field anomaly interpretation

Authors:
S. G. Alekseev1
S. A. Kozlov2
M. B. Shtokalenko3
V. E. Smirnov4
About authors
  • 1 — Ph.D. laboratory head FGU NPP «Geologorazvedka»
  • 2 — research assistant FGU NPP «Geologorazvedka»
  • 3 — Ph.D. senior research assistant FGU NPP «Geologorazvedka»
  • 4 — student Saint Petersburg State Mining University
Date submitted:
2010-12-28
Date accepted:
2011-02-28
Date published:
2011-12-30

Abstract

This paper contains methods of gravity and magnetic data processing with evaluation of effective density and magnetic intensity of rocks. The most preferred method of 3D-processing so as to create three dimensional models of gravity and magnetic distribution is that one which count gravity and magnetic fields around a circle near the calculation point. It is highly effectively to use this method if there are some isometric objects. This algorithm leads to a geometry distortion of the resulting objects and a marked increase in predicted depth if examined bodies are twodimensional and overlie horizontal or aslope. This might cause errors in data interpretation.

Область исследования:
(Archived) Application of the modern geophysical technologies for prospecting and exploration of mineral deposits
Keywords:
effective density effective magnetism 3D-interpretation errors
Go to volume 194

References

  1. Bloch Y.I., Kaplun D.V., Konyaev O.N. Opportunities to potential field interpretation with singular point method in integrated system «Singular» // University news. Geology and prospecting. 1993. N 6. P.123-127.
  2. Kozlov S.A., Alekseev S.G., Lebedkin P.A., Savizkiy A.P., Shtokalenko M.B. Seismic cross section lateral comparison with potential field singular sources structures, effective density and rock magnetism // Theory and practics of the geological interpretation of gravimetric, magnetic and electromagnetic data: Materials of the 36 session of D.G.Uspenskiy international scientific seminar. Kazan, 2009. P.164-166.
  3. Priezev I.I. Conversion of physical parameters structure according to the data from gravity prospecting, magnetic prospecting and seismic prospecting // Geophysics. 2005. N 3. P.46-51.
  4. Shtokalenko M.B., Alekseev S.G. Wavelet-transformations with physical meaning // Theory and practics of the geological interpretation of gravimetric, magnetic and electromagnetic data: Materials of the 34 session of D.G.Uspenskiy international scientific seminar. Мoscow, 2007. P.293-297.

Similar articles

Regularities of formation and distribution оf the zonal groundwater of the Eastern caucasus (on the example of Dagestan)
2011 Sh. G. Samedov
Peculiiarities of geodynamic development оf the devonian graben at Spitsbergen archipelago
2011 A. N. Sirotkin, D. V. Nikitin
Regional forecasting and metallogenic studies of uranium and their role in the formation of the mineral resource base of nuclear industry in Russia
2011 A. A. Smislov, A. V. Kozlov
Application of optimal complex оf geophysical express-technologies in solution of environmental problems at the territories of industrial and domestic wastes storage
2011 D. A. Gaponov
Economic assessment of natural resources in the national wealth
2011 N. Ya. Lobanov, M. A. Nеvskaya
Methodical approaches to the economical estimation of CO2 – enhanced oil recovery projects
2011 A. E. Cherepovitsyn, O. A. Marinina