Submit an Article
Become a reviewer
Vol 194
Pages:
128-131
Download volume:
RUS
Article

Characteristics of 2D- and 3D-potential field anomaly interpretation

Authors:
S. G. Alekseev1
S. A. Kozlov2
M. B. Shtokalenko3
V. E. Smirnov4
About authors
  • 1 — Ph.D. laboratory head FGU NPP «Geologorazvedka»
  • 2 — research assistant FGU NPP «Geologorazvedka»
  • 3 — Ph.D. senior research assistant FGU NPP «Geologorazvedka»
  • 4 — student Saint Petersburg State Mining University
Date submitted:
2010-12-28
Date accepted:
2011-02-28
Date published:
2011-12-30

Abstract

This paper contains methods of gravity and magnetic data processing with evaluation of effective density and magnetic intensity of rocks. The most preferred method of 3D-processing so as to create three dimensional models of gravity and magnetic distribution is that one which count gravity and magnetic fields around a circle near the calculation point. It is highly effectively to use this method if there are some isometric objects. This algorithm leads to a geometry distortion of the resulting objects and a marked increase in predicted depth if examined bodies are twodimensional and overlie horizontal or aslope. This might cause errors in data interpretation.

Область исследования:
(Archived) Application of the modern geophysical technologies for prospecting and exploration of mineral deposits
Keywords:
effective density effective magnetism 3D-interpretation errors
Go to volume 194

References

  1. Bloch Y.I., Kaplun D.V., Konyaev O.N. Opportunities to potential field interpretation with singular point method in integrated system «Singular» // University news. Geology and prospecting. 1993. N 6. P.123-127.
  2. Kozlov S.A., Alekseev S.G., Lebedkin P.A., Savizkiy A.P., Shtokalenko M.B. Seismic cross section lateral comparison with potential field singular sources structures, effective density and rock magnetism // Theory and practics of the geological interpretation of gravimetric, magnetic and electromagnetic data: Materials of the 36 session of D.G.Uspenskiy international scientific seminar. Kazan, 2009. P.164-166.
  3. Priezev I.I. Conversion of physical parameters structure according to the data from gravity prospecting, magnetic prospecting and seismic prospecting // Geophysics. 2005. N 3. P.46-51.
  4. Shtokalenko M.B., Alekseev S.G. Wavelet-transformations with physical meaning // Theory and practics of the geological interpretation of gravimetric, magnetic and electromagnetic data: Materials of the 34 session of D.G.Uspenskiy international scientific seminar. Мoscow, 2007. P.293-297.

Similar articles

Geophysical survey results in а copper-porphyre deposit (Republic of Tuva)
2011 A. N. Orekhov
Amplitude-phase correction of magnitotellurie impedance curves
2011 I. S. Feldman, E. Yu. Ermolin
Use of earth crust cavities for registration of earthquakes forerunners
2011 E. V. Burdakova
«Gazprom»: answers to the world economic crisis challenges
2011 N. A. Lomagin
Application of inphase response component by low-frequency airborne electroprospecting EM-4H system
2011 A. K. Volkovitskii, E. V. Karshakov, E. V. Moilanen
Phased strategy of drilling manufacture re-structuring and it's economy importance
2011 E. A. Krainova