Submit an Article
Become a reviewer
Vol 208
Pages:
143-153
Download volume:
RUS
Article

Systematization of investment projects risks within the framework of the concession agreements in the mining industry

Authors:
Ju. V. Liuebek
About authors
  • Ph.D. associate professor National Mineral Resources University (Mining University)
Date submitted:
2013-08-14
Date accepted:
2013-10-09
Date published:
2014-07-15

Abstract

Systematization of risks of concession projects in mining industry allows to create the basis for development of risk management model in order to decrease their influence on results of investment activity within concession agreements by means of their optimum distribution during which financial stability of the project is reached and the interests of each interested side of the concession agreement are observed.

Область исследования:
(Archived) Effective management in mineral resources complex and energy industry: approaches, tools and mechanisms
Keywords:
risks of projects the concession agreement the concession object
Funding:

None

Go to volume 208

References

  1. Blagov Yu.Е.Сorporate social responsibility: the evolution of the concept. Saint Petersburg, 2010. 272 p.
  2. Van-Van-E. А.P. Basic principles of formation of mineral agglomerations // Mountain information-analytical bulletin. 2011. No 1. C.367-373.
  3. Public-private partnership: the theory and practice / V.S. Varnavsky, A.V. Klimenko, V.A. Korolev a.o. Moscow, 2010. 287 p.
  4. Pogrebnyak M.Т. Сlassification of risks encountered in concession projects. // The culture of the peoples of the Black Sea. 2009. No 152. Р.20-23.
  5. Tambovtsev V.l. Stakeholder theory of the firm in the concept of proprietary form // Russian management journal. 2008. Vol.6. N 3. P.3-26.
  6. Shahov O.F., Millerman A.S. Risks of concession projects // Finance. 2011. N 4. Р.43-48.
  7. Post J.E., Preston L.E., Sachs S. Managing the extended enterprise. The new stakeholder view // California Management Review. 2002. Vol.45 (1). P.7
  8. Jensen M.C. Value maximization, stakeholder theory and the corporate objective function // Business Ethics Quarterly. 2002. Vol.12(2). Р.235-256.
  9. Post J.E., Preston L.E., Sachs S. Redefining the Corporation: Stakeholder Management and Organizational Wealth. Stanford, 2002. Р.53.

Similar articles

Effectiveness complex approach for development group metal ore fields
2014 V. R. Kabirov, E. I. Reishakhrit
Role of the state in innovative development of oil and gas complex (on the example of Russia and Norway)
2014 E. G. Katysheva
Branch approach to training of specialists in the field of the public and municipal administration for resource-extraction
2014 M. M. Khaikin
Organizational and legal issues disposal and recycling of solid household waste
2014 Iu. A. Veselova
The influence of standards banking regulation to the cost of enterprises’ capital (the example of the mining industry)
2014 T. V. Nikitina, M. I. Sakovich
Reliability and quality of electric power produce
2014 S. V. Mozhaeva