Submit an Article
Become a reviewer
Vol 208
Pages:
143-153
Download volume:
RUS
Article

Systematization of investment projects risks within the framework of the concession agreements in the mining industry

Authors:
Ju. V. Liuebek
About authors
  • Ph.D. associate professor National Mineral Resources University (Mining University)
Date submitted:
2013-08-14
Date accepted:
2013-10-09
Date published:
2014-07-15

Abstract

Systematization of risks of concession projects in mining industry allows to create the basis for development of risk management model in order to decrease their influence on results of investment activity within concession agreements by means of their optimum distribution during which financial stability of the project is reached and the interests of each interested side of the concession agreement are observed.

Область исследования:
(Archived) Effective management in mineral resources complex and energy industry: approaches, tools and mechanisms
Keywords:
risks of projects the concession agreement the concession object
Go to volume 208

References

  1. Blagov Yu.Е.Сorporate social responsibility: the evolution of the concept. Saint Petersburg, 2010. 272 p.
  2. Van-Van-E. А.P. Basic principles of formation of mineral agglomerations // Mountain information-analytical bulletin. 2011. No 1. C.367-373.
  3. Public-private partnership: the theory and practice / V.S. Varnavsky, A.V. Klimenko, V.A. Korolev a.o. Moscow, 2010. 287 p.
  4. Pogrebnyak M.Т. Сlassification of risks encountered in concession projects. // The culture of the peoples of the Black Sea. 2009. No 152. Р.20-23.
  5. Tambovtsev V.l. Stakeholder theory of the firm in the concept of proprietary form // Russian management journal. 2008. Vol.6. N 3. P.3-26.
  6. Shahov O.F., Millerman A.S. Risks of concession projects // Finance. 2011. N 4. Р.43-48.
  7. Post J.E., Preston L.E., Sachs S. Managing the extended enterprise. The new stakeholder view // California Management Review. 2002. Vol.45 (1). P.7
  8. Jensen M.C. Value maximization, stakeholder theory and the corporate objective function // Business Ethics Quarterly. 2002. Vol.12(2). Р.235-256.
  9. Post J.E., Preston L.E., Sachs S. Redefining the Corporation: Stakeholder Management and Organizational Wealth. Stanford, 2002. Р.53.

Similar articles

A method of structuring the conflict interaction organizational and technical systems
2014 L. E. Mystrov, D. A. Pervukhin, I. V. Ilyushin
The influence of standards banking regulation to the cost of enterprises’ capital (the example of the mining industry)
2014 T. V. Nikitina, M. I. Sakovich
State support to mining monotowns: new approaches and tools
2014 G. N. Kharitonova, L. V. Ivanova
An approach to the environmental assessment of territorial complexes
2014 V. N. Sibirev, N. V. Racheva
Assessment of costs associated with the introduction of technology coarse crushing on the example of the diamond deposit them. M.V.Lomonosov
2014 A. V. Iamov, I. A. Kuznetsov, A. V. Babyk, S. A. Rubis
Concept of an integraed economic assessment of natural resources (on the example of national park «Kurshskaya scythe»)
2014 I. Yu. Vasilevich