Docking zones of responsibility for achieving development targets of commodity companies
- Ph.D., Dr.Sci. professor Higher School of Economics
Abstract
Case studies show the urgency of the problem of securing zones of responsibility for achieving development targets. The article gives a current practice analysis in the domestic economy. The importance for companies not only to assess past achievements, but to study the characteristics of the development prospects is stressed. The article deals with questions of quantification, targeting and allocation of responsibility for achieving development targets of commodity companies. The cost of oil and gas companies as a criterion for its development is analized. The impact of various factors on the cost is assessed. The article high lightens the role of external factors in the current period as well as the importance of the fundamental ones. It also shows the possibility of calculating out come indicators by different measures in the face of negative factors. The system of targeted strategic and planning targets for quantitative assess-ment of the strategic goal sand objectives to achieve the misdemonstrated. For example, the largest Russian company Gazprom shows one way to implement such an approach. Gazprom's system of targeted strategic, planning and monitoring indicators for quan-tifying the strategic objectives and ways of achieving the misshown and management based on targeting and consolidation of areas of responsibility is recommended.
References
- Valdajcev S.V. Ocenka biznesa i upravlenie stoimost'ju predprijatija (Estimate of business and management of the vakue of the enterpris). Moscow: Juniti-Dana, 2002.
- Kaplan R.S., Norton D.P. Sbalansirovannaja sistema pokazatelej. Ot strategii k dejstviju (Balanced system of indicators. From strategy to action). Moscow: ZAO «Olimp-Biznes», 2010.
- Kennet Ferris, Barbara Peshero Peti. Ocenka stoimosti kompanii. Kak izbezhat' oshibok pri priobretenii (Estimation of value of the company. How to avoid mistakes at acquisition). Moscow: Izdatel'skij dom «Vil'jams», 2005.
- Kouplend T., Koller T., Murrin Dzh. Stoimost' kompanij: ocenka i upravlenie (Value of the companies: assessment and management). Moscow: ZAO «Olimp-Biznes», 2008.
- Lukashov A.V., Tjurin Ju.V. Globalizacija stoimosti: rynochnaja kapitalizacija i mehanizmy formirovanija stoimosti neftegazovyh kompanij (Globalization of value: market capitalization and mechanisms of formation of value oil and gas companies). Sektor E&P (Chast' I). Upravlenie korporativnymi finansami. 2007. Vol.23. N 5.
- Makarov A.A., Grigor'ev L.M., Mitrova T.A. et.al. Prognoz razvitija jenergetiki mira i Rossii do 2040 goda (The forecast of development of power of the world and Russia till 2040). Moscow: In-t jenergeticheskih issledovanij. RAN, 2013.
- Ulanov V.L. Izmerenie rezul'tatov strategicheskogo razvitija syr'evyh kompanij (Measurement of results of strategic development of the raw companies). Jekonomist, 2014. N 7.
- Ulanov V.L. O formirovanii upravlencheskih pokazatelej neftegazovyh kompanij (Formation of management indicators of the oil and gas companies). Mineral'nye resursy Rossii. Jekonomika i upravlenie. 2014. N 5.
- Ulanov V.L. Neobhodimo vernut'sja k proverennym tehnologijam upravlenija (Should return to the checked technologies of management). General'nyj direktor: Upravlenie promyshlennym predprijatiem. 2014. N 7.
- Cagwin D., Bouwman M.J. The Association between Activity-Based Costing and Improvement in Financial Performance. Management Accounting Research. 2002. Vol.13, N 1 (March).
- Adsera X., Vinolas P. Activity-Based Costing. Management and Its Implications for Operations Management. Financial Analysts Journal. 2003. Vol.59. N 2. (Mar/Apr).