Submit an Article
Become a reviewer
Vol 263
Download volume:

Structure maintenance experience and the need to control the soils thermal regime in permafrost areas

Anatolii V. Brushkov1
Andrei G. Alekseev2
Svetlana V. Badina3
Dmitrii S. Drozdov4
Vladimir A. Dubrovin5
Oleg V. Zhdaneev6
Mikhail N. Zheleznyak7
Vladimir P. Melnikov8
Sergei N. Okunev9
Aleksei B. Osokin10
Nikolai A. Ostarkov11
Marat R. Sadurtinov12
Dmitrii O. Sergeev13
Roman Yu. Fedorov14
Konstantin N. Frolov15
About authors
  • 1 — Ph.D., Dr.Sci. Head of Department Lomonosov Moscow State University ▪ Orcid
  • 2 — Ph.D. Head of the Center for Geocryological and Geotechnical Research Gersevanova NIIOSP, AO Research Center of Construction ▪ Orcid
  • 3 — Ph.D. Researcher Lomonosov Moscow State University ▪ Orcid
  • 4 — Ph.D., Dr.Sci. Deputy Director Earth Cryosphere Institute, Tyumen Scientific Centre, Siberian Branch of RAS ▪ Orcid
  • 5 — Ph.D. Chief Specialist Gidrospetsgeologiya ▪ Orcid
  • 6 — Ph.D., Dr.Sci. Head Technology Development Center for Fuel and Energy Complex of the Ministry of Energy of the Russian Federation ▪ Orcid
  • 7 — Ph.D., Dr.Sci. Corresponding Member of the RAS, Director Melnikov Permafrost Institute, Siberian Branch of RAS ▪ Orcid
  • 8 — Ph.D., Dr.Sci. Academician of the RAS, Head of Research Area Earth Cryosphere Institute, Tyumen Scientific Centre, Siberian Branch of RAS ▪ Orcid
  • 9 — Ph.D. Chief Engineer ООО SPA “Foundationstroyarkos” ▪ Orcid
  • 10 — Ph.D. Deputy Head of Engineering and Technical Center “Gazprom Dobycha Nadym” ▪ Orcid
  • 11 — Ph.D. Leading Analytical Expert Eastern State Planning Center ▪ Orcid
  • 12 — Ph.D. Leading Researcher Earth Cryosphere Institute, Tyumen Scientific Centre, Siberian Branch of RAS ▪ Orcid
  • 13 — Ph.D. Head of Laboratory Институт геоэкологии им. Е.М.Сергеева РАН ▪ Orcid
  • 14 — Ph.D., Dr.Sci. Chief Researcher Earth Cryosphere Institute, Tyumen Scientific Centre, Siberian Branch of RAS ▪ Orcid
  • 15 — Project Manager Technology Development Center for Fuel and Energy Complex of the Ministry of Energy of the Russian Federation ▪ Orcid
Date submitted:
Date accepted:
Date published:


The risks of reducing the stability of buildings and structures are increasing in conditions of climate change and the active development of the territories under the influence of natural and anthropogenic factors. The main causes include: loss of the bearing capacity of frozen soils, various geocryological processes, errors at the stages of design, construction and operation of facilities. Main actual task when conducting research and industrial operations in the cryolithozone is monitoring and, if necessary, managing thermal processes in the permafrost layers interacting with facilities. In this article the obtained positive experience of various technologies applying at various stages of the life cycle of civil and industrial facilities was analyzed. It helps to eliminate or prevent the structure deformation or destruction under the influence of climate change. The methods of permafrost stabilization used in the oil and gas industry in process of industrial infrastructure development of the fields have been studied – freezing (cooling) of foundation soils during construction on heterogeneous foundations. The solution to the problems of minimizing accidents when locating production wells in the permafrost zone of the Yamal Peninsula is considered using the example of an oil and gas condensate field and restoring of the temperature regime of perennial unfrozen soils in areas of valve units of main gas pipelines. An assessment of methods used to maintain the industrial and residential infrastructure within the northern municipalities that ensure the functioning of the fuel and energy complex of the Russian Federation in the Arctic was made. The systems of thermal stabilization in the foundations of buildings and industrial facilities built and operated on permafrost soils allow to fully use the high strength and low deformability of frozen grounds. It ensures the state's long-term plans of the industrial development in the Arctic.

cryolithozone permafrost soils background monitoring geotechnical monitoring thermal stabilization facility operation
Go to volume 263


  1. Жданеев О.В. Обеспечение технологического суверенитета отраслей ТЭК Российской Федерации // Записки Горного института. 2022. Т. 258. С. 1061-1078. DOI: 10.31897/PMI.2022.107
  2. Литвиненко В.С., Петров Е.И., Василевская Д.В. и др. Оценка роли государства в управлении минеральными ресурсами // Записки Горного института. 2023. Т. 259. С. 95-111. DOI: 10.31897/PMI.2022.100
  3. Mingtang Chai, Guoyu Li, Wei Ma et al. Assessment of Freeze–Thaw Hazards and Water Features along the China – Russia Crude Oil Pipeline in Permafrost Regions // Remote Sensing. 2020. Vol. 12. Iss. 21. № 3576. DOI: 10.3390/rs12213576
  4. Suter L., Streletskiy D., Shiklomanov N. Assessment of the cost of climate change impacts on critical infrastructure in the circumpolar Arctic // Polar Geography. 2019. Vol. 42. Iss. 4. P. 267-286. DOI: 10.1080/1088937X.2019.1686082
  5. Streletskiy D.A., Suter L.J., Shiklomanov N.I. et al. Assessment of climate change impacts on buildings, structures and infrastructure in the Russian regions on permafrost // Environmental Research Letters. 2019. Vol. 14. № 2. № 025003. DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/aaf5e6
  6. Timofeev A.V., Piirainen V.Y., Bazhin V.Y., Titov A.B. Operational Analysis and Medium-Term Forecasting of the Greenhouse Gas Generation Intensity in the Cryolithozone // Atmosphere. 2021. Vol. 12. Iss. 11. № 1466. DOI: 10.3390/atmos12111466
  7. Post E., Alley R.B., Christensen T.R. et al. The polar regions in a 2 °C warmer world // Science Advances. 2019. Vol. 5. Iss. 12. № eaaw9883. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aaw9883
  8. Raynolds M.K., Walker D.A., Ambrosius K.J. et al. Cumulative geoecological effects of 62 years of infrastructure and climate change in ice-rich permafrost landscapes, Prudhoe Bay Oilfield, Alaska // Global Change Biology. 2014. Vol. 20. Iss. 4. P. 1211-1224. DOI: 10.1111/gcb.12500
  9. Melnikov V.P., Osipov V.I., Brushkov A.V. et al. Past and Future of Permafrost Monitoring: Stability of Russian Energetic Infrastructure // Energies. 2022. Vol. 15. Iss. 9. № 3190. DOI: 10.3390/en15093190
  10. Min Liew, Xiaohang Ji, Ming Xiao et al. Synthesis of physical processes of permafrost degradation and geophysical and geomechanical properties of permafrost // Cold Regions Science and Technology. 2022. Vol. 198. № 103522. DOI: 10.1016/j.coldregions.2022.103522
  11. Ze Zhang, Wei Ma, Zhongqiong Zhang. Scientific concept and application of frozen soil engineering system // Cold Regions Science and Technology. 2018. Vol. 146. P. 127-132. DOI: 10.1016/j.coldregions.2017.11.017
  12. Мельников В.П., Осипов В.И., Брушков А.В. и др. Развитие геокриологического мониторинга природных и технических объектов в криолитозоне Российской Федерации на основе систем геотехнического мониторинга топливно-энергетического комплекса // Криосфера Земли. 2022. Т. 26. № 4. С. 3-18. DOI: 10.15372/KZ20220401
  13. Hjort J., Karjalainen O., Aalto J. et al. Degrading permafrost puts Arctic infrastructure at risk by mid-century // Nature Communications. 2018. Vol. 9. № 5147. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-07557-4
  14. Flynn D., Kurz D., Alfaro M. et al. Forecasting Ground Temperatures under a Highway Embankment on Degrading Permafrost // Journal of Cold Regions Engineering. 2016. Vol. 30. Iss. 4. № 04016002. DOI: 10.1061/(asce)cr.1943-5495.0000106
  15. Karjalainen O., Aalto J., Luoto M. et al. Circumpolar permafrost maps and geohazard indices for near-future infrastructure risk assessments // Science Data. 2019. Vol. 6. № 190037. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2019.37
  16. Melvin A.M., Larsen P., Boehlert B. et al. Climate change damages to Alaska public infrastructure and the economics of proactive adaptation // The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2017. Vol. 114. № 2. P. E122-E131. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1611056113
  17. Buslaev G., Tsvetkov P., Lavrik A. et al. Ensuring the Sustainability of Arctic Industrial Facilities under Conditions of Global Climate Change // Resources. 2021. Vol. 10. Iss. 12. № 128. DOI: 10.3390/resources10120128
  18. Lin Chen, Fortier D., McKenzie J.M., Sliger M. Impact of heat advection on the thermal regime of roads built on permafrost // Hydrological Processes. 2019. Vol. 34. Iss. 7. P. 1647-1664. DOI: 10.1002/hyp.13688
  19. Loktionov E.Y., Sharaborova E.S., Shepitko T.V. A sustainable concept for permafrost thermal stabilization // Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments. 2022. Vol. 52. Part A. № 102003. DOI: 10.1016/j.seta.2022.102003
  20. Shammazov I.A., Batyrov A.M., Sidorkin, D.I., Van Nguyen T. Study of the Effect of Cutting Frozen Soils on the Supports of Above-Ground Trunk Pipelines // Applied Sciences. 2023. Vol. 13. Iss. 5. № 3139. DOI: 10.3390/app13053139
  21. Васильев Г.Г., Джалябов А.А., Леонович И.А. Анализ причин возникновения деформаций инженерных сооружений объектов газового комплекса в криолитозоне // Записки Горного института. 2021. Т. 249. С. 377-385. DOI: 10.31897/PMI.2021.3.6
  22. Putikov O., Kholmyanski M., Ivanov G., Senchina N. Application of geoelectrochemical method for exploration of petroleum fields on the Arctic shelf // Geochemistry. 2020. Vol. 80. Iss. 3. № 125498. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoch.2019.02.001
  23. Syasko V., Shikhov A. Assessing the State of Structural Foundations in Permafrost Regions by Means of Acoustic Testing // Applied Sciences. 2022. Vol. 12. Iss. 5. № 2364. DOI: 10.3390/app12052364
  24. Eppelbaum L.V., Kutasov I.M. Well drilling in permafrost regions: dynamics of the thawed zone // Polar Research. 2019. Vol. 38. № 3351. DOI: 10.33265/polar.v38.3351
  25. Chuvilin E., Ekimova V., Davletshina D. et al. Evidence of Gas Emissions from Permafrost in the Russian Arctic // Geosciences. 2020. Vol. 10. Iss. 10. № 383. DOI: 10.3390/geosciences10100383
  26. Zhdaneev O., Frolov K., Petrakov Y. Predictive Systems for the Well Drilling Operations // Cyber-Physical Systems: Design and Application for Industry 4.0. Springer, 2021. Vol. 342. P. 347-368. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-66081-9_28
  27. Громадский А.Н., Арефьев С.В., Волков Н.Г. и др. Дистанционный контроль за температурным режимом вечномерзлых грунтов под зданиями г. Салехард // Научный вестник Ямало-Ненецкого автономного округа. 2019. № 3 (104). С. 17-21. DOI: 10.26110/ARCTIC.2019.104.3.003
  28. Мельников И.В., Нерсесов С.В., Осокин А.Б. и др. Геотехнические решения для строительства газовых скважин в особо сложных геокриологических условиях полуострова Ямал // Газовая промышленность. 2019. № 12 (794). С. 64-71.
  29. Чикалов С.Г., Пышминцев И.Ю., Засельский Е.М. и др. Опыт применения теплоизолированных лифтовых труб в условиях газовых месторождений Севера Западной Сибири // Газовая промышленность. 2018. № 12 (778). С. 38-42.
  30. Георгияди В.Г., Агапов А.А., Поверенный Ю.С. и др. Применение сверхтонкой теплоизоляции при обустройстве месторождений в районах распространения многолетнемерзлых грунтов // Нефтяное хозяйство. 2023. № 1. С. 52-57. DOI: 10.24887/0028-2448-2023-1-52-57
  31. Sharaborova E.S., Shepitko T.V., Loktionov E.Y. Experimental Proof of a Solar-Powered Heat Pump System for Soil Thermal Stabilization. // Energies. 2022. Vol. 15. Iss. 6. № 2118. DOI: 10.3390/en15062118
  32. Судакова М.С., Брушков А.В., Великин С.А. и др. Геофизические методы в геокриологическом мониторинге // Вестник Московского университета. Серия 4. Геология. 2022. № 6. С. 141-151. DOI: 10.33623/0579-9406-2022-6-141-151
  33. Мулев С.Н., Рукавишников Г.Д., Мороз Д.И. и др. Мониторинг напряженного состояния сейсмическими и расчетными методами на шахтах АО «Воркутауголь» // Уголь. 2022. № 12. С. 88-93. DOI: 10.18796/0041-5790-2022-12-88-93
  34. Kamnev Ya.K., Filimonov M.Yu., Shein A.N., Vaganova N.A. Automated Monitoring The Temperature Under Buildings With Pile Foundations In Salekhard (Preliminary Results) // Geography. Environment. Sustainability. 2021. Vol. 14. № 4. P. 75-82. DOI: 10.24057/2071-9388-2021-021
  35. Шаммазов И.А., Сидоркин Д.И., Батыров А.М. Обеспечение устойчивости надземных магистральных трубопроводов в районах сплошного распространения многолетнемерзлых пород // Известия Томского политехнического университета. Инжиниринг георесурсов. 2022. Т. 333. № 12. С. 200-207. DOI: 10.18799/24131830/2022/12/3832

Similar articles

Scientific and technical substantiation of the possibility for the organization of needle coke production in Russia
2023 Vyacheslav А. Rudko, Renat R. Gabdulkhakov, Igor N. Pyagai
250 years in the service of the Fatherland: Empress Catherine II Saint Petersburg Mining University in facts and figures
2023 Sergei N. Rudnik, Vladimir G. Afanasev, Ekaterina A. Samylovskaya
Mineral composition and thermobarometry of metamorphic rocks of Western Ny Friesland, Svalbard
2023 Yurii L. Gulbin, Sima A. Akbarpuran Khaiyati, Aleksandr N. Sirotkin
Mining Museum as a space of science and education in Mining University
2023 Daniil Yu. Dorofeev, Nataliya V. Borovkova, Мarina А. Vasileva
Magmatic system of the Klyuchevskoy volcano according to seismic data and their geomechanical interpretation
2023 Aleksei V. Kiryukhin, Olga V. Bergal-Kuvikas, Mikhail V. Lemzikov, Nikita B. Zhuravlev
New data on the composition of growth medium of fibrous diamonds from the placers of the Western Urals
2023 Nikolai V. Gubanov, Dmitrii A. Zedgenizov, Evgenii A. Vasilev, Vladimir A. Naumov