Submit an Article
Become a reviewer
Vol 243
Pages:
305-312
Download volume:
RUS ENG

Description of steady inflow of fluid to wells with different configurations and various partial drilling-in

Authors:
Valery A. Iktissanov
About authors
  • Ph.D., Dr.Sci. Professor Tatar Oil Research and Design Institute
Date submitted:
2020-06-15
Date accepted:
2020-06-15
Date published:
2020-06-30

Abstract

There are many equations of steady inflow of fluid to the wells depending on the type of well, presence or absence of artificial or natural fractures passing through the well, different degrees of drilling-in of the wellbores. For some complex cases, analytical solutions describing the inflow of fluid to the well have not yet been obtained. An alternative to many equations is the use of numerical methods, but this approach has a significant disadvantage – a considerable counting time. In this regard, it is important to develop a more general analytical approach to describe different types of wells with different formation drilling-in and presence or absence of fractures. Creation of this method is possible during modeling of fractures by a set of nodes-vertical wells passing from a roof to floor, and modeling of a wellbore (wellbores, perforation) by a set of nodes – spheres close to each other. As a result, based on this approach, a calculation algorithm was developed and widely tested, in which total inflow to the well consists of the flow rate of each node taking into account the interference between the nodes and considering the impermeable roof and floor of the formation. Performed modeling confirmed a number of known patterns for horizontal wells, perforation, partial drilling-in of a formation, and also allowed solving a number of problems.

Keywords:
spherical flow radial flow steady filtration wells fracture partial drilling-in perforation
10.31897/pmi.2020.3.305
Go to volume 243

References

  1. Aliev Z.S., Somov B.E., Chekushin V.F. Substantiation of the design for horizontal and multiborehole-horizontal wells for the development of oil fields. Moscow: Izdatelstvo “Tekhnika”; OOO “Tuma grupp”, 2001, p. 192 (in Russian).
  2. Basniev K.S., Aliev Z.S., Chernykh V.V. Methods for calculating the flow rates of horizontal, directed and multiborehole gas wells. Moscow: IRTs OAO “Gazprom”, 1999, p. 47 (in Russian).
  3. Borisov Yu.P., Pilatovskii V.P., Tabakov V.P. Development of oil fields by horizontal and multibottomhole wells. Moscow: Nedra, 1964, p. 154 (in Russian).
  4. Grigoryan A.M. Drilling-in of formation by multibottomhole and horizontal wells. Moscow: Nedra. 1969, p. 192 (in Russian).
  5. Domanyuk F.N. Development of analytical methods for forecasting the performance of horizontal and complex-profile wells: Avtoref. diss. … kand. tekhn. nauk. Rossiiskii gosudarstvennyi universitet nefti i gaza im. I.M.Gubkina. Moscow, 2012, p. 24 (in Russian).
  6. Domanyuk F.N., Zolotukhin A.B. Determination of productivity for a well with a rectilinear profile in a vertical isotropic formation. Neftyanoe khozyaistvo. 2011. N 5, p. 92-95 (in Russian).
  7. Iktissanov V.A. Hydrodynamic investigations and modeling of multiborehole horizontal wells: Izd-vo “Pluton”, 2007, p. 124 (in Russian).
  8. Iktissanov V.A. Simulation of fluid motion to wells of various configurations using spherical flow. 2018. N 5, p. 52-55. DOI: 10.24887/0028-2448-2018-5-52-55 (in Russian).
  9. Khairullin M.Kh., Khisamov R.S., Shamsiev M.N., Farkhullin R.G. Interpretation of the results for hydrodynamic investigations of wells by regularization methods. Moscow-Izhevsk: NITs “Regulyarnaya i khaoticheskaya dinamika”; Institut kompyuternykh issledovanii, 2006. 172 s (in Russian).
  10. Nasybullin A.V., Voikin V.F. Determination of the flow rate for a horizontal well at a steady state in the flooding element. Georesursy. 2015. N 4. Part 2, p.35-38. DOI: 10.18599/grs.63.4.22 (in Russian).
  11. Tokarev G.M., Tokareva N.M., Tokarev M.A. Improving the drilling-in of productive formations in complex technological conditions. Neftegazovoe delo. 2013. N 1, p. 232-239 (in Russian).
  12. Aziz K.A. General Single-Phase Wellbore/Reservoir Coupling Model for Multilateral Wells. Society of Petroleum Engineers. 2001. Vol. 4. Iss. 4, p. 327-335. DOI: 10.2118/72467-РА
  13. Butler R.M. Horizontal wells for the recovery of oil, gas and bitumen. Petroleum Society of the CIM Monograph, 1997, p. 224.
  14. Houzé O., Viturat D., Fjaere O.S. Dynamic Data Analysis -v.5.10.01. KAPPA 1988-2016, p. 708.
  15. Iktissanov V.A. Pressure Transient Analysis and Simulation of Nonconventional Wells. Society of Petroleum Engineers. SPE Russian Oil and Conference and Exhibition 26-28 October 2010. Moscow, Russia. DOI: 10.2118/133477-MS
  16. Litvinenko V.S., Dvoynikov M.V. Monitoring and control of the drilling string and bottomhole motor work dynamics. Leiden, The Neverlands: CRC Press. BalkemaTopical Issues of Rational Use of Natural Resources. 2019. Vol. 2. Iss. 1, p. 804-809.
  17. Ozkan E., Raghavan R. New solutions for Well-Test-Analysis Problems: Part 1 – Analytical Considerations. Society of Petroleum Engineer. 1991. Vol. 6. Iss. 3, p. 359-378.
  18. Wolfsteiner C., Durlofsky L.J., Aziz K. Approximate Model for Productivity of Nonconventional Wells in Heterogeneous Reservoirs. Society of Petroleum Engineer. 2000. Vol. 5. Iss. 2, p. 218-226.

Similar articles

Study of the technogenesis of the Degtyarsky mine by audio-magnetotelluric express sounding
2020 Vadim A. Davydov
Non-destructive testing of multilayer medium by the method of velocity of elastic waves hodograph
2020 Aleksandr I. Potapov, Artem V. Kondratev
Improving the geological and hydrodynamic model of a carbonate oil object by taking into account the permeability anisotropy parameter
2020 Dmitry A. Martyushev
Management of hardening mixtures properties when stowing mining sites of ore deposits
2020 Vladimir I. Golik, Yury V. Dmitrak, Vitaly I. Komashchenko, Nikolay M. Kachurin
Revisiting the evolution of deformation zones under platform conditions in the case study of the Kungur Ice Cave (Cis-Urals)
2020 Nataliya V. Lavrova
Features of permeability anisotropy accounting in the hydrodynamic model
2020 Roman I. Yermekov, Vitaly P. Merkulov, Oksana S. Chernova, Mikhail O. Korovin