Submit an Article
Become a reviewer
JOURNAL IMPACT FACTOR
2.4
WEB OF SCIENCE (ESCI)
citescore
7.5
scopus

Vol 11 No 1

Previous
Vol 9 No 2
Vol 11 No 1
  • Vol 271
  • Vol 270
  • Vol 269
  • Vol 268
  • Vol 267
  • Vol 266
  • Vol 265
  • Vol 264
  • Vol 263
  • Vol 262
  • Vol 261
  • Vol 260
  • Vol 259
  • Vol 258
  • Vol 257
  • Vol 256
  • Vol 255
  • Vol 254
  • Vol 253
  • Vol 252
  • Vol 251
  • Vol 250
  • Vol 249
  • Vol 248
  • Vol 247
  • Vol 246
  • Vol 245
  • Vol 244
  • Vol 243
  • Vol 242
  • Vol 241
  • Vol 240
  • Vol 239
  • Vol 238
  • Vol 237
  • Vol 236
  • Vol 235
  • Vol 234
  • Vol 233
  • Vol 232
  • Vol 231
  • Vol 230
  • Vol 229
  • Vol 228
  • Vol 227
  • Vol 226
  • Vol 225
  • Vol 224
  • Vol 223
  • Vol 222
  • Vol 221
  • Vol 220
  • Vol 219
  • Vol 218
  • Vol 217
  • Vol 216
  • Vol 215
  • Vol 214
  • Vol 213
  • Vol 212
  • Vol 211
  • Vol 210
  • Vol 209
  • Vol 208
  • Vol 207
  • Vol 206
  • Vol 205
  • Vol 204
  • Vol 203
  • Vol 202
  • Vol 201
  • Vol 200
  • Vol 199
  • Vol 198
  • Vol 197
  • Vol 196
  • Vol 195
  • Vol 194
  • Vol 193
  • Vol 191
  • Vol 190
  • Vol 192
  • Vol 189
  • Vol 188
  • Vol 187
  • Vol 185
  • Vol 186
  • Vol 184
  • Vol 183
  • Vol 182
  • Vol 181
  • Vol 180
  • Vol 179
  • Vol 178
  • Vol 177
  • Vol 176
  • Vol 174
  • Vol 175
  • Vol 173
  • Vol 172
  • Vol 171
  • Vol 170 No 2
  • Vol 170 No 1
  • Vol 169
  • Vol 168
  • Vol 167 No 2
  • Vol 167 No 1
  • Vol 166
  • Vol 165
  • Vol 164
  • Vol 163
  • Vol 162
  • Vol 161
  • Vol 160 No 2
  • Vol 160 No 1
  • Vol 159 No 2
  • Vol 159 No 1
  • Vol 158
  • Vol 157
  • Vol 156
  • Vol 155 No 2
  • Vol 154
  • Vol 153
  • Vol 155 No 1
  • Vol 152
  • Vol 151
  • Vol 150 No 2
  • Vol 150 No 1
  • Vol 149
  • Vol 147
  • Vol 146
  • Vol 148 No 2
  • Vol 148 No 1
  • Vol 145
  • Vol 144
  • Vol 143
  • Vol 140
  • Vol 142
  • Vol 141
  • Vol 139
  • Vol 138
  • Vol 137
  • Vol 136
  • Vol 135
  • Vol 124
  • Vol 130
  • Vol 134
  • Vol 133
  • Vol 132
  • Vol 131
  • Vol 129
  • Vol 128
  • Vol 127
  • Vol 125
  • Vol 126
  • Vol 123
  • Vol 122
  • Vol 121
  • Vol 120
  • Vol 118
  • Vol 119
  • Vol 116
  • Vol 117
  • Vol 115
  • Vol 113
  • Vol 114
  • Vol 112
  • Vol 111
  • Vol 110
  • Vol 107
  • Vol 108
  • Vol 109
  • Vol 105
  • Vol 106
  • Vol 103
  • Vol 104
  • Vol 102
  • Vol 99
  • Vol 101
  • Vol 100
  • Vol 98
  • Vol 97
  • Vol 95
  • Vol 93
  • Vol 94
  • Vol 91
  • Vol 92
  • Vol 85
  • Vol 89
  • Vol 87
  • Vol 86
  • Vol 88
  • Vol 90
  • Vol 83
  • Vol 82
  • Vol 80
  • Vol 84
  • Vol 81
  • Vol 79
  • Vol 78
  • Vol 77
  • Vol 76
  • Vol 75
  • Vol 73 No 2
  • Vol 74 No 2
  • Vol 72 No 2
  • Vol 71 No 2
  • Vol 70 No 2
  • Vol 69 No 2
  • Vol 70 No 1
  • Vol 56 No 3
  • Vol 55 No 3
  • Vol 68 No 2
  • Vol 69 No 1
  • Vol 68 No 1
  • Vol 67 No 1
  • Vol 52 No 3
  • Vol 67 No 2
  • Vol 66 No 2
  • Vol 64 No 2
  • Vol 64 No 1
  • Vol 54 No 3
  • Vol 65 No 2
  • Vol 66 No 1
  • Vol 65 No 1
  • Vol 53 No 3
  • Vol 63 No 1
  • Vol 61 No 1
  • Vol 62 No 1
  • Vol 63 No 2
  • Vol 62 No 2
  • Vol 61 No 2
  • Vol 59 No 2
  • Vol 60 No 2
  • Vol 51 No 3
  • Vol 60 No 1
  • Vol 49 No 3
  • Vol 50 No 3
  • Vol 59 No 1
  • Vol 57 No 2
  • Vol 58 No 2
  • Vol 58 No 1
  • Vol 56 No 2
  • Vol 57 No 1
  • Vol 55 No 2
  • Vol 48 No 3
  • Vol 56 No 1
  • Vol 47 No 3
  • Vol 55 No 1
  • Vol 54 No 2
  • Vol 53 No 2
  • Vol 54 No 1
  • Vol 52 No 2
  • Vol 46 No 3
  • Vol 53 No 1
  • Vol 52 No 1
  • Vol 51 No 2
  • Vol 51 No 1
  • Vol 50 No 2
  • Vol 49 No 2
  • Vol 48 No 2
  • Vol 50 No 1
  • Vol 49 No 1
  • Vol 45 No 3
  • Vol 47 No 2
  • Vol 44 No 3
  • Vol 43 No 3
  • Vol 42 No 3
  • Vol 48 No 1
  • Vol 46 No 2
  • Vol 45 No 2
  • Vol 46 No 1
  • Vol 47 No 1
  • Vol 44 No 2
  • Vol 43 No 2
  • Vol 41 No 3
  • Vol 42 No 2
  • Vol 39 No 3
  • Vol 37 No 3
  • Vol 45 No 1
  • Vol 41 No 2
  • Vol 39 No 2
  • Vol 44 No 1
  • Vol 38 No 2
  • Vol 37 No 2
  • Vol 38 No 3
  • Vol 43 No 1
  • Vol 42 No 1
  • Vol 41 No 1
  • Vol 40
  • Vol 39 No 1
  • Vol 36 No 2
  • Vol 35 No 2
  • Vol 38 No 1
  • Vol 35 No 3
  • Vol 34 No 2
  • Vol 34 No 3
  • Vol 33 No 2
  • Vol 36 No 1
  • Vol 37 No 1
  • Vol 36 No 3
  • Vol 35 No 1
  • Vol 34 No 1
  • Vol 32 No 3
  • Vol 33 No 3
  • Vol 32 No 2
  • Vol 33 No 1
  • Vol 31
  • Vol 30 No 3
  • Vol 30 No 2
  • Vol 30 No 1
  • Vol 32 No 1
  • Vol 29 No 3
  • Vol 29 No 1
  • Vol 29 No 2
  • Vol 28
  • Vol 27 No 1
  • Vol 27 No 2
  • Vol 26 No 2
  • Vol 26 No 1
  • Vol 25 No 2
  • Vol 25 No 1
  • Vol 23
  • Vol 24
  • Vol 15 No 16
  • Vol 22
  • Vol 20
  • Vol 17 No 18
  • Vol 21
  • Vol 19
  • Vol 13 No 3
  • Vol 14
  • Vol 13 No 2
  • Vol 12 No 3
  • Vol 12 No 2
  • Vol 13 No 1
  • Vol 12 No 1
  • Vol 11 No 3
  • Vol 11 No 2
  • Vol 10 No 3
  • Vol 10 No 2
  • Vol 11 No 1
  • Vol 9 No 2
  • Vol 10 No 1
  • Vol 9 No 1
  • Vol 8
  • Vol 7 No 3
  • Vol 7 No 2
  • Vol 7 No 1
  • Vol 6 No 2
  • Vol 6 No 1
  • Vol 5 No 4-5
  • Vol 5 No 2-3
  • Vol 5 No 1
  • Vol 4 No 5
  • Vol 4 No 4
  • Vol 4 No 3
  • Vol 4 No 2
  • Vol 3
  • Vol 4 No 1
  • Vol 2 No 5
  • Vol 2 No 4
  • Vol 2 No 3
  • Vol 2 No 1
  • Vol 2 No 2
  • Vol 1 No 5
  • Vol 1 No 4
  • Vol 1 No 3
  • Vol 1 No 2
  • Vol 1 No 1
Articles
  • Date submitted
    1936-07-09
  • Date accepted
    1936-09-13
  • Date published
    1937-01-01

Mineralogy of the Khalilovskie deposits of chrome spinels, magnesium carbonates and nickel ores in the Southern Urals

Article preview

The purpose of this article is the mineralogical study of the Khalilovsky nickel-hydrosilicate deposits. Along with this author, chromite and magnesite deposits were examined. As a result of geological observations, a geological map and sketches were compiled. Chromite itself and holocrystalline magnesite are unknown in Khalilov. Minerals of chromium and salts of magnesium carbonate are represented by completely different mineral species. Therefore, their deposits are named in a broader sense, namely chrome spinels and magnesian carbonates. There are 25 elements known in the Khalilovsky massif: H, K, Na, Mg, Ca, Sr, Ba, Ag, Au, Pt, Zn, Cu, Fe, Ni, Co, Mn, Cr, Ti, V, As, P, Si, Zr(?), C, S. Of these, the content of noble metals is noted spectrally; Zn, V - in traces, Sr, Ba - in hundredths of a percent.

How to cite: Kiselev A.I. Mineralogy of the Khalilovskie deposits of chrome spinels, magnesium carbonates and nickel ores in the Southern Urals // Journal of Mining Institute. 1937. Vol. № 1 11. p. 1-60.
Articles
  • Date submitted
    1936-07-24
  • Date accepted
    1936-09-28
  • Date published
    1937-01-01

Influence of orogenic movements on the composition of ore-bearing facies of the Chiatura manganese deposit

Article preview

One of the remarkable features of the geology of the Chiatura manganese deposit is the presence of different facies of ore-bearing sediments. Of particular interest is the change in these facies in the vertical section of the manganese ore strata, which was well traced both from outcrops and from numerous drill holes. Analysis of the geological structure of the formation of ore-bearing sediments and host rocks led to the conclusion that the vertical change of facies depended on the orogenic movements that took place at the time of formation of the manganese ore strata. A very interesting fact was that within the area of the Chiatura deposit, which occupies an area of about 100 square meters. km, the amplitude of these movements in different parts of it was apparently unequal, which affected the mineralogical composition and structure of various facies. The proposed work contains a brief summary of the main provisions relating mainly to this phenomenon, almost unknown in the literature, among sedimentary ore deposits. There is reason to assume that changes in the composition of facies in the vertical section in the Oligocene deposits of the Chiatura region were caused by orogenic movements, which were the last echoes of the pre-Oligocene orogenic phase.

How to cite: Betekhtin A.G. Influence of orogenic movements on the composition of ore-bearing facies of the Chiatura manganese deposit // Journal of Mining Institute. 1937. Vol. № 1 11. p. 89-108.
Articles
  • Date submitted
    1936-07-10
  • Date accepted
    1936-09-22
  • Date published
    1937-01-01

New data on the tectonics of central Kopet-Dag

Article preview

Kopet-Dag is a mountainous region, poorly illuminated geologically. The question of a clear understanding of the tectonic structure of Kopet-Dag is of enormous importance for determining the regime of groundwater, the direction of its flows, quantity, area of distribution, etc. The problem of water in Turkmenistan has always been one one of the most important, and now in connection with the socialist reconstruction of Ashgabat, the development of industry and cotton crops in the Kopetdag region, it is of particular importance. An accurate understanding of the true tectonic structure of Kopet-Dag is also required in order to find the place and role of the latter on the tectonic background of the vast territory embracing the folded regions of southern and northern Iran, Armenia, the Caucasus, Mangyshlak and Emba. This will undoubtedly bring clarity to the understanding of the nature of the relationship between the Kopet-Dag and the Karakum depression and will be the necessary material for solving the most important practical problem of Turkmenistan regarding the direction of the continuation of the Western Turkmen oil strip.

How to cite: Miroshnochenko V.P. New data on the tectonics of central Kopet-Dag // Journal of Mining Institute. 1937. Vol. № 1 11. p. 133-160.
Articles
  • Date submitted
    1936-07-22
  • Date accepted
    1936-09-05
  • Date published
    1937-01-01

Materials for understanding the genesis of the Monetnaya Dacha emerald deposit in the Urals

Article preview

Emerald mines are located on the eastern slope of the Urals among a swampy forest area 70 km northeast of Sverdlovsk, in the former Monetnaya forest dacha. The formation of the Emerald Mines region involves metamorphic and igneous rocks with abundant and varied vein derivatives. Sedimentary rocks have not been identified, except for modern sandy-clayey deposits. The rocks composing the region can be divided into the following groups: northeastern porphyritic granite, western granite, eastern intrusion, including southeastern gabbro, a band of amphibolites and a northeastern complex of metamorphic rocks.

How to cite: Uspenskii N.M. Materials for understanding the genesis of the Monetnaya Dacha emerald deposit in the Urals // Journal of Mining Institute. 1937. Vol. № 1 11. p. 161-205.
Geology
  • Date submitted
    1936-07-10
  • Date accepted
    1936-09-02
  • Date published
    1937-01-01

Geology of the Soviet Tien Shan in the light of new data

Article preview

In connection with the identified new scheme of the geological structure of the Soviet Tien Shan, all the volcanic processes of the latter are rejuvenated. In confirmation of this, we observe the appearance of basalts among the tertiary sediments in the valley of the Naryn River, discovered by S. S. Shultz, granite aplites in the Dzhemandavan ridge, found by O.I. Sergunkova, cutting through the Tertiary Naryn salt-bearing formation, the deposit of cockade lead ores described by I.I. Bezdeka in the Akshiyryak ridge among Quaternary conglomerates, etc. All this suggests that it is necessary to set a priority task to review all manifestations of volcanism in within the Tien Shan and not only Alpine tectogenesis, but also more ancient periods of its manifestations. This question is not only of purely scientific, but also of great practical importance, as it makes it possible to expand the base of searches for various minerals associated with intrusions, both vertically and in area. All those deposits that were previously considered characteristic only of the “central arcs” of the Tien Shan can now and should be discovered in the “northern arcs” of the latter, such as deposits of mercury, antimony, arsenic, radioactive ores, etc.

How to cite: Mukhin V.G. Geology of the Soviet Tien Shan in the light of new data // Journal of Mining Institute. 1937. Vol. № 1 11. p. 61-88.
Geology
  • Date submitted
    1936-07-28
  • Date accepted
    1936-09-16
  • Date published
    1937-01-01

On the geology of the Bukachachinsky coal deposit

Article preview

The Bukachachinskoye field, located in Eastern Transbaikalia (coordinates 53° N and 116°50' E), attracts attention for three reasons. Firstly, among other Mesozoic spots in Transbaikalia, it has undergone the most detailed geological research , and therefore the results of work on it make it possible to outline a methodology for studying such deposits, which has not yet been sufficiently developed, secondly, because its study sheds light on the genesis of Upper Jurassic deposits and tectonics and, thirdly, because the deposit has sintering coals, which sharply distinguishes it from other brown coal deposits in Transbaikal. The coal-bearing deposits of the deposit occupy an area of about 40 km², their boundaries are the Sarananda and Kudikhta rivers. Coal-bearing deposits are surrounded by hills of crystalline rocks, and the boundary of their distribution coincides with the boundaries of the valley. These contours, in addition to their natural outlines, due to the different hardness of crystalline rocks and coal-bearing deposits, were established by exploration work, the lines of which intersect the deposit at a close distance from each other, and these lines in places extend onto granites. There are no natural outcrops of coal-bearing strata in the area, and all data on its occurrence and composition were obtained on the basis of workings.

How to cite: Unknown On the geology of the Bukachachinsky coal deposit // Journal of Mining Institute. 1937. Vol. № 1 11. p. 109-131.