Submit an Article
Become a reviewer
JOURNAL IMPACT FACTOR
2.4
WEB OF SCIENCE (ESCI)
citescore
7.5
scopus

Vol 28

Previous
Vol 27 No 1
Vol 28
  • Vol 271
  • Vol 270
  • Vol 269
  • Vol 268
  • Vol 267
  • Vol 266
  • Vol 265
  • Vol 264
  • Vol 263
  • Vol 262
  • Vol 261
  • Vol 260
  • Vol 259
  • Vol 258
  • Vol 257
  • Vol 256
  • Vol 255
  • Vol 254
  • Vol 253
  • Vol 252
  • Vol 251
  • Vol 250
  • Vol 249
  • Vol 248
  • Vol 247
  • Vol 246
  • Vol 245
  • Vol 244
  • Vol 243
  • Vol 242
  • Vol 241
  • Vol 240
  • Vol 239
  • Vol 238
  • Vol 237
  • Vol 236
  • Vol 235
  • Vol 234
  • Vol 233
  • Vol 232
  • Vol 231
  • Vol 230
  • Vol 229
  • Vol 228
  • Vol 227
  • Vol 226
  • Vol 225
  • Vol 224
  • Vol 223
  • Vol 222
  • Vol 221
  • Vol 220
  • Vol 219
  • Vol 218
  • Vol 217
  • Vol 216
  • Vol 215
  • Vol 214
  • Vol 213
  • Vol 212
  • Vol 211
  • Vol 210
  • Vol 209
  • Vol 208
  • Vol 207
  • Vol 206
  • Vol 205
  • Vol 204
  • Vol 203
  • Vol 202
  • Vol 201
  • Vol 200
  • Vol 199
  • Vol 198
  • Vol 197
  • Vol 196
  • Vol 195
  • Vol 194
  • Vol 193
  • Vol 191
  • Vol 190
  • Vol 192
  • Vol 189
  • Vol 188
  • Vol 187
  • Vol 185
  • Vol 186
  • Vol 184
  • Vol 183
  • Vol 182
  • Vol 181
  • Vol 180
  • Vol 179
  • Vol 178
  • Vol 177
  • Vol 176
  • Vol 174
  • Vol 175
  • Vol 173
  • Vol 172
  • Vol 171
  • Vol 170 No 2
  • Vol 170 No 1
  • Vol 169
  • Vol 168
  • Vol 167 No 2
  • Vol 167 No 1
  • Vol 166
  • Vol 165
  • Vol 164
  • Vol 163
  • Vol 162
  • Vol 161
  • Vol 160 No 2
  • Vol 160 No 1
  • Vol 159 No 2
  • Vol 159 No 1
  • Vol 158
  • Vol 157
  • Vol 156
  • Vol 155 No 2
  • Vol 154
  • Vol 153
  • Vol 155 No 1
  • Vol 152
  • Vol 151
  • Vol 150 No 2
  • Vol 150 No 1
  • Vol 149
  • Vol 147
  • Vol 146
  • Vol 148 No 2
  • Vol 148 No 1
  • Vol 145
  • Vol 144
  • Vol 143
  • Vol 140
  • Vol 142
  • Vol 141
  • Vol 139
  • Vol 138
  • Vol 137
  • Vol 136
  • Vol 135
  • Vol 124
  • Vol 130
  • Vol 134
  • Vol 133
  • Vol 132
  • Vol 131
  • Vol 129
  • Vol 128
  • Vol 127
  • Vol 125
  • Vol 126
  • Vol 123
  • Vol 122
  • Vol 121
  • Vol 120
  • Vol 118
  • Vol 119
  • Vol 116
  • Vol 117
  • Vol 115
  • Vol 113
  • Vol 114
  • Vol 112
  • Vol 111
  • Vol 110
  • Vol 107
  • Vol 108
  • Vol 109
  • Vol 105
  • Vol 106
  • Vol 103
  • Vol 104
  • Vol 102
  • Vol 99
  • Vol 101
  • Vol 100
  • Vol 98
  • Vol 97
  • Vol 95
  • Vol 93
  • Vol 94
  • Vol 91
  • Vol 92
  • Vol 85
  • Vol 89
  • Vol 87
  • Vol 86
  • Vol 88
  • Vol 90
  • Vol 83
  • Vol 82
  • Vol 80
  • Vol 84
  • Vol 81
  • Vol 79
  • Vol 78
  • Vol 77
  • Vol 76
  • Vol 75
  • Vol 73 No 2
  • Vol 74 No 2
  • Vol 72 No 2
  • Vol 71 No 2
  • Vol 70 No 2
  • Vol 69 No 2
  • Vol 70 No 1
  • Vol 56 No 3
  • Vol 55 No 3
  • Vol 68 No 2
  • Vol 69 No 1
  • Vol 68 No 1
  • Vol 67 No 1
  • Vol 52 No 3
  • Vol 67 No 2
  • Vol 66 No 2
  • Vol 64 No 2
  • Vol 64 No 1
  • Vol 54 No 3
  • Vol 65 No 2
  • Vol 66 No 1
  • Vol 65 No 1
  • Vol 53 No 3
  • Vol 63 No 1
  • Vol 61 No 1
  • Vol 62 No 1
  • Vol 63 No 2
  • Vol 62 No 2
  • Vol 61 No 2
  • Vol 59 No 2
  • Vol 60 No 2
  • Vol 51 No 3
  • Vol 60 No 1
  • Vol 49 No 3
  • Vol 50 No 3
  • Vol 59 No 1
  • Vol 57 No 2
  • Vol 58 No 2
  • Vol 58 No 1
  • Vol 56 No 2
  • Vol 57 No 1
  • Vol 55 No 2
  • Vol 48 No 3
  • Vol 56 No 1
  • Vol 47 No 3
  • Vol 55 No 1
  • Vol 54 No 2
  • Vol 53 No 2
  • Vol 54 No 1
  • Vol 52 No 2
  • Vol 46 No 3
  • Vol 53 No 1
  • Vol 52 No 1
  • Vol 51 No 2
  • Vol 51 No 1
  • Vol 50 No 2
  • Vol 49 No 2
  • Vol 48 No 2
  • Vol 50 No 1
  • Vol 49 No 1
  • Vol 45 No 3
  • Vol 47 No 2
  • Vol 44 No 3
  • Vol 43 No 3
  • Vol 42 No 3
  • Vol 48 No 1
  • Vol 46 No 2
  • Vol 45 No 2
  • Vol 46 No 1
  • Vol 47 No 1
  • Vol 44 No 2
  • Vol 43 No 2
  • Vol 41 No 3
  • Vol 42 No 2
  • Vol 39 No 3
  • Vol 37 No 3
  • Vol 45 No 1
  • Vol 41 No 2
  • Vol 39 No 2
  • Vol 44 No 1
  • Vol 38 No 2
  • Vol 37 No 2
  • Vol 38 No 3
  • Vol 43 No 1
  • Vol 42 No 1
  • Vol 41 No 1
  • Vol 40
  • Vol 39 No 1
  • Vol 36 No 2
  • Vol 35 No 2
  • Vol 38 No 1
  • Vol 35 No 3
  • Vol 34 No 2
  • Vol 34 No 3
  • Vol 33 No 2
  • Vol 36 No 1
  • Vol 37 No 1
  • Vol 36 No 3
  • Vol 35 No 1
  • Vol 34 No 1
  • Vol 32 No 3
  • Vol 33 No 3
  • Vol 32 No 2
  • Vol 33 No 1
  • Vol 31
  • Vol 30 No 3
  • Vol 30 No 2
  • Vol 30 No 1
  • Vol 32 No 1
  • Vol 29 No 3
  • Vol 29 No 1
  • Vol 29 No 2
  • Vol 28
  • Vol 27 No 1
  • Vol 27 No 2
  • Vol 26 No 2
  • Vol 26 No 1
  • Vol 25 No 2
  • Vol 25 No 1
  • Vol 23
  • Vol 24
  • Vol 15 No 16
  • Vol 22
  • Vol 20
  • Vol 17 No 18
  • Vol 21
  • Vol 19
  • Vol 13 No 3
  • Vol 14
  • Vol 13 No 2
  • Vol 12 No 3
  • Vol 12 No 2
  • Vol 13 No 1
  • Vol 12 No 1
  • Vol 11 No 3
  • Vol 11 No 2
  • Vol 10 No 3
  • Vol 10 No 2
  • Vol 11 No 1
  • Vol 9 No 2
  • Vol 10 No 1
  • Vol 9 No 1
  • Vol 8
  • Vol 7 No 3
  • Vol 7 No 2
  • Vol 7 No 1
  • Vol 6 No 2
  • Vol 6 No 1
  • Vol 5 No 4-5
  • Vol 5 No 2-3
  • Vol 5 No 1
  • Vol 4 No 5
  • Vol 4 No 4
  • Vol 4 No 3
  • Vol 4 No 2
  • Vol 3
  • Vol 4 No 1
  • Vol 2 No 5
  • Vol 2 No 4
  • Vol 2 No 3
  • Vol 2 No 1
  • Vol 2 No 2
  • Vol 1 No 5
  • Vol 1 No 4
  • Vol 1 No 3
  • Vol 1 No 2
  • Vol 1 No 1
Geology
  • Date submitted
    1952-07-09
  • Date accepted
    1952-09-29
  • Date published
    1953-01-01

Hydrogeology of the USSR (Brief overview)

Article preview

On the eve of the Great Patriotic War, a group of hydrogeologists from TsNIGRI — M. M. Vasilievsky, G. A. Lebedev, N. F. Pogrebov, N. A. Revunova, B. K. Terletsky and N. I. Tolstikhin — compiled a general hydrogeological map of the USSR on a scale of 1:5,000,000, with an explanatory note that was being prepared for publication. The war prevented the publication of the work. Most of the compilers of the map and the note — N. F. Pogrebov, M. M. Vasilievsky, G. A. Lebedev, B. K. Terletsky — died. Over the past decade, regional hydrogeology in the USSR has made great strides, but the explanatory note to the map has not lost its interest and significance, therefore, with the permission of the director of VSEGEI, Prof. L. Ya. Nesterov, it is printed in this edition. The map cannot be published by technical reasons. Instead, a hydrogeological zoning scheme is attached, compiled on the basis of a geological map on a scale of 1:7,500,000, published in 1950, taking into account the hydrogeological zoning maps prepared by M. M. Vasilievsky and G. A. Lebedev.

How to cite: Vasilevskii M.M., Lebedev G.A., Pogrebov I.F., Revunova I.A., Terletskii B.K., Tolstikhin N.I. Hydrogeology of the USSR (Brief overview) // Journal of Mining Institute. 1953. Vol. 28 . p. 3-36.
Geology
  • Date submitted
    1952-07-08
  • Date accepted
    1952-09-05
  • Date published
    1953-01-01

Mineral springs of South-Eastern Transbaikalia

Article preview

In Soviet times, numerous geological, exploration, hydrogeological and other parties working in South-Eastern Transbaikalia described many mineral springs. Some of them are of great interest both in their original composition and in the conditions of the release and formation of mineral waters. This brief review is intended to familiarize the reader with this new data on the mineral waters of South-Eastern Transbaikalia. Klinsky mineral spring (Klinovsky mineral spring). Mineral water comes out at the base of the slope of the right ravine of the Klin River valley 1 km north of the settlement of Klin. This slope of the ravine faces the southeast. Jurassic and Quaternary sedimentary deposits, as well as igneous rocks, participate in the geological structure of the spring's vicinity. The section of the Upper and Middle, and partly the Lower Jurassic, is presented schematically (from top to bottom).

How to cite: Tolstikhin N.I., Marinov N.A. Mineral springs of South-Eastern Transbaikalia // Journal of Mining Institute. 1953. Vol. 28 . p. 37-58.
Geology
  • Date submitted
    1952-07-14
  • Date accepted
    1952-09-29
  • Date published
    1953-01-01

Zavitinskoe deposit

Article preview

The Zavitinskoye deposit is located in the northwestern spurs of the Borshchevochny Ridge on the right bank of the Ingoda River, 15 km in a straight line to the southwest of its confluence with the Onon River. The distance from the deposit to the district center of the village of Shilka is 55 km. The deposit is located on the left slope of the Slyudyanka ravine and along its watershed with the Kamenka ravine, which are the sources of the Pravaya ravine, a tributary of the Ingoda River. The relief in the area of ​​the deposit is characterized by smoothed forms. Wide, gentle, barely noticeable watersheds and extensive gentle catchments of rivers and springs represent a common picture in the vicinity of the Zavitinskoye deposit. The Zavitinskoye deposit, having a number of properties common to many spodumene deposits, also has some peculiarities. In the history of its formation, the magmatic stage and a number of successive stages of mineralization associated with the circulation of late magmatic solutions are quite clearly distinguished. The combination of several stages of activity of late magmatic solutions, which caused the transformation of previously deposited minerals, their recrystallization and replacement by new mineral associations with the continuing process of development of ore-bearing cracks, determined the complexity and diversity of the structure and mineralization of the dikes. The wide development of changes in the host rocks, due to the influence of late magmatic solutions, is closely related to the general process of mineralization of pegmatite dikes.

How to cite: Golikov A.S. Zavitinskoe deposit // Journal of Mining Institute. 1953. Vol. 28 . p. 59-102.
Geology
  • Date submitted
    1952-07-13
  • Date accepted
    1952-09-08
  • Date published
    1953-01-01

Granitoid intrusions of the Subpolar Urals and their relationship to host rocks

Article preview

The crystal-bearing strip of the Subpolar Urals, the geological description of which is the subject of this article, covers the watershed part of the Ural Range, located within 64°30' - 65°20' north latitude, i.e. from Mount Khus-Oika in the south to the Maldy Range in the north. Along the main watershed of the Ural Range, the crystal-bearing strip has been traced for 150 km and is 25 km wide. The geological study of the crystal-bearing strip is being carried out by the Polar-Ural Expedition of the 8th Main Directorate of the USSR Ministry of the Pacific Ocean. The author of the article took part in the work of this expedition for 10 years. In 1952, the author, together with geologist V. A. Smirnova, completed the compilation of a geological map of the crystal-bearing strip on a scale of 1:100,000 for an area of ​​about 4000 km2. Unfortunately, this map cannot be included as a necessary supplement to this article due to its large size.

How to cite: Karyakin A.E. Granitoid intrusions of the Subpolar Urals and their relationship to host rocks // Journal of Mining Institute. 1953. Vol. 28 . p. 103-115.
Geology
  • Date submitted
    1952-07-25
  • Date accepted
    1952-09-12
  • Date published
    1953-01-01

Types of quartz veins of the Urals and their crystal content

Article preview

Three systems of jointing cracks predominate in the rocks of the crystal-bearing strip of the Northern Urals: concordant, intersecting and transverse. Almost all crystal-bearing quartz veins of the Northern Urals are confined to these cracks. Among the quartz veins of the Northern Urals, the first two types are most common. Transverse quartz veins are less common. It should be noted that the division of quartz veins into the listed types is conditional, since they are all of the same age, genetically related and fulfill a system of three interconnected tectonic cracks

How to cite: Karyakin A.E. Types of quartz veins of the Urals and their crystal content // Journal of Mining Institute. 1953. Vol. 28 . p. 117-128.
Geology
  • Date submitted
    1952-07-22
  • Date accepted
    1952-09-04
  • Date published
    1953-01-01

Nizhne-Angarskoye iron ore deposit

Article preview

The majestic program of building communism in our country, outlined by I. V. Stalin in his historic speech at the pre-election meeting of voters of the Stalin electoral district of Moscow on February 9, 1946, requires for its implementation the development of new reserves of industrial raw materials, among which iron ores are almost in first place. Therefore, it is natural that the new Angara-Pitsky iron ore basin, discovered in 1946, in which the Nizhne-Angarskoye deposit is so far the largest and most explored, acquires great significance.

How to cite: Staritskii Y.G. Nizhne-Angarskoye iron ore deposit // Journal of Mining Institute. 1953. Vol. 28 . p. 129-139.
Geology
  • Date submitted
    1952-07-08
  • Date accepted
    1952-09-16
  • Date published
    1953-01-01

On the classification of industrial pegmatites of Northern Karelia and the direction of exploration work on mica

Article preview

Many researchers have attempted to classify the pegmatite formations of Northern Karelia, but all proposed schemes suffer from a one-sided approach to taking into account the existing geological factors and use only one or two guiding ones, ignoring the rest. Thus, some divide all the pegmatites of the region into mica-bearing and ceramic [1], others classify them by mineral composition [3], others only by shape, and others by shape and the nature of the distribution of mica in the veins. None of the proposed classifications take into account the geological and structural factors characterizing the conditions of formation of industrial pegmatites. For these reasons, the listed classifications of industrial pegmatites of Northern Karelia are almost never used in prospecting and exploration work, as well as in assessing these deposits. The most perfect classification of pegmatites of Northern Karelia should be considered the classification proposed by V.D. Nikitin and P.P. Borovikov, in the compilation of which the author's materials were used. Studies of pegmatites in Northern Karelia conducted in recent years have provided a significant amount of material for determining the conditions of formation of pegmatites and classifying them according to genetic characteristics.

How to cite: Skropyshev A.V. On the classification of industrial pegmatites of Northern Karelia and the direction of exploration work on mica // Journal of Mining Institute. 1953. Vol. 28 . p. 141-148.
Geology
  • Date submitted
    1952-07-03
  • Date accepted
    1952-09-05
  • Date published
    1953-01-01

On the age of the Shakhtaminsky granitoids and the connection with mineralization

Article preview

The author conducted research in the area of ​​a large molybdenite deposit in Eastern Transbaikalia, explored mainly during the years of the Great Patriotic War. The Shakhtama deposit is located in the Chita region, Shakhtama district, at the head of the Shakhtama River of the same name. The studied area extends in a latitudinal direction as a strip, the length of which is 100 km, the width is about 8 km. Within the specified area, the author conducted prospecting and survey work and compiled a geological map (1: 50,000). The data provided for the Shakhtama district allow us to shed new light on the age relationships of rocks and issues of mineralization distribution.

How to cite: Zuev N.V. On the age of the Shakhtaminsky granitoids and the connection with mineralization // Journal of Mining Institute. 1953. Vol. 28 . p. 149-172.
Mining
  • Date submitted
    1952-07-21
  • Date accepted
    1952-09-09
  • Date published
    1953-01-01

The state of knowledge of the issues of exploitation of mineral deposits in permafrost conditions

Article preview

There are almost no comprehensive data on the operating conditions of mineral deposits in the permafrost zone. The available information usually provides a one-sided assessment of the operating conditions, so it is necessary to approach them critically. Most often, permafrost is considered a positive factor that facilitates the construction and maintenance of mine workings, drainage and reduces the risk of underground fires of endogenous origin, gas emission and dust formation. With a short service life of underground workings driven in the stable permafrost zone, their maintenance is indeed facilitated and the water inflow is reduced. Meanwhile, some theoretical premises and practical data force us to reconsider this position. With an unstable permafrost regime, which is explained by the heterogeneity of the geothermal regime of the region and the influence of construction, the construction and maintenance of mine workings of an especially long service life may be even more difficult and expensive than under normal conditions, and the influx of water can create a threat to the very existence of the mine. It is characteristic that even authors who consider permafrost to be a positive factor point out these difficulties.

How to cite: Gerontev V.I. The state of knowledge of the issues of exploitation of mineral deposits in permafrost conditions // Journal of Mining Institute. 1953. Vol. 28 . p. 173-183.
Mining
  • Date submitted
    1952-07-06
  • Date accepted
    1952-09-29
  • Date published
    1953-01-01

On the issue of permafrost formation and degradation of permafrost in non-stationary temperature fields

Article preview

The theoretical calculation of the movement of the permafrost boundary inside the soil under the influence of temperature changes on the surface is of great scientific importance in permafrost science: a whole range of issues of the dynamics of the permafrost process depends on its solution, including the correct scientific analysis of the current state of the permafrost zone, its changes (degradation and onset) under the influence of climate change, the correct definition of the role and place of the thermal factor in a number of geological and other factors of permafrost formation, etc. However, this calculation can also have important practical significance for a number of problems of industrial development of the permafrost area, for example, for establishing a rational thermal regime for the currently empirically used methods of artificial thawing of frozen deposits, for industrial construction in the permafrost zone, etc. The problem of permafrost penetration into the soil or permafrost thawing is similar to the problem of propagation of the solidification boundary into the molten mass. Unfortunately, the latter can be solved exactly only under stationary conditions, with the initial temperature of the liquid being the same everywhere and a constant temperature given on the surface, taken below the freezing point.

How to cite: Ter-Pogosyan A.S. On the issue of permafrost formation and degradation of permafrost in non-stationary temperature fields // Journal of Mining Institute. 1953. Vol. 28 . p. 185-195.
Metallurgy and concentration
  • Date submitted
    1952-07-26
  • Date accepted
    1952-09-26
  • Date published
    1953-01-01

A new method for separating copper-nickel converter mattes

Article preview

The separation of copper-nickel converter mattes in the general scheme of processing sulphide copper-nickel ores is one of the most complex and expensive operations. Of the large number of methods proposed for the separation of converter mattes, the modern copper-nickel industry, as is known, has settled on three, of which the most widespread is the separation smelting of converter matte with sodium sulfide. However, this process, which is approximately sixty years old, is distinguished by significant complexity, and in addition, its implementation at our plants requires long-distance imported materials. Therefore, it is natural to search for more advanced and cheaper methods of separating copper-nickel converter mattes. One of the main prerequisites in developing a process for separating any material is the availability of data on its material composition and structure.

How to cite: Maslenitskii I.I., Krichevskii L.A. A new method for separating copper-nickel converter mattes // Journal of Mining Institute. 1953. Vol. 28 . p. 197-256.