Submit an Article
Become a reviewer
Vol 160 No 1
Pages:
47-49
Download volume:

Rhetoric: the past in the present

Authors:
O. I. Marchenko
About authors
  • St. Petersburg State University
Date submitted:
2004-06-29
Date accepted:
2004-07-23
Date published:
2005-01-01

Abstract

This article reflects both diachronic and synchronic aspects of rhetoric comprehension. Rhetorical culture as a whole, as it is known, fulfills the functions of production, fixation, storage and transmission of spiritual experience. The process of speech relations becomes human only when it is mediated by ideal products of culture: norms, values, ideals. Values and norms of rhetoric accumulate the highest incentives of human behavior, have an inducing, effective force, are one of the stable universal bases of culture. Speech is not only a means of transmitting knowledge or truths, but, first of all, a way of establishing mutual understanding, which is the focus of the person acting with words. The basis of any historical type of culture is the type of personality corresponding to it. An unfree, dissociated, passive, limited person is dangerous for culture; he can be opposed to the rhetorical type of personality, through the word realizing one of the most important human needs - the need to communicate with other people. Rhetoric helps the process of consistent formation, self-knowledge, self-exaltation of personality.

Go to volume 160

References

  1. Бахтин М.М. Эстетика словесного творчества. 2-е изд. М., 1986.

Similar articles

Rhetorical aspect of the course "Scientific Speech" for graduate and postgraduate students
2005 N. I. Kolesnikova
The subject of political rhetoric
2005 V. V. Danilina
Rhetoric and speech culture in the system of speech studying disciplines
2005 A. A. Evtyugina
The external dialogicality of contemporary political advertising
2005 S. A. Chubai
Types of rhetorical figures in modern church epistles
2005 I. Yu. Yarmulskaya
Ways of activation of learning and cognitive activity of students of technical university in teaching foreign languages
2005 M. A. Perfilova