Submit an Article
Become a reviewer
Vol 199
Pages:
211
Download volume:

Historical analysis of the system of estimation and expert’s examination of explored ore reserves in Russia

Authors:
A. V. Kozlov1
V. A. Stepanov2
I. G. Kiryakova3
A. N. Evdokimov4
About authors
  • 1 — National Mineral Resources University (Mining University)
  • 2 — National Mineral Resources University (Mining University)
  • 3 — National Mineral Resources University (Mining University)
  • 4 — National Mineral Resources University (Mining University)
Date submitted:
2011-11-27
Date accepted:
2012-01-16
Date published:
2012-05-01

Abstract

Acting in Russia methodology of estimation and expert’s examination of calculated mineral reserves has been organized in the Soviet period, during development of the rigidly centralized system of the state planning and management. Since, 20 years there isn’t in the country any state monopoly (and financing) in the mining brunch and geological exploration. The new approaches are needed in procedure of estimating mineral reserves explored by the private enterprises. Anyway, functions, which the State Commission on mineral reserves (SCR) used to carry out in the Soviet time, remain nearly the same at present. Its full-scale authority, obligatory specifications are in clear contradiction with real economic relationship in the country.  Computer modeling of ore bodies, composed on the base of geostatistical analysis of the exploration data, determines their natural contours and the ore grade distribution far more precisely than the formal index of the reserve’s category. There isn’t any necessity to approve in the SCR the so called group of the ore deposit complexity, nor the Technical-economic validation of limiting conditions. The mere procedure of the state approval of explored ore reserves ought to have the record keeping character.

Go to volume 199

References

  1. Астахов А.С. Экономика разведки, добычи и переработки полезных ископаемых (геоэкономика). М., 1991.
  2. Вестник Геологического Комитета. 1928. Т.3. № 6.
  3. Горная энциклопедия. М., 1986. Т.2.
  4. Несис В.Н. Иностранцы не привыкли к законодательно закрепленной шизофрении. http://www.finmarket.ru/ z/nws/interview.asp?id=2641458
  5. Пертель Д.А. Компьютерные технологии в практике освоения недр России // Записки Горного института. 2005. Т.162.
  6. Российский кодекс публичной отчетности о результатах геолого-разведочных работ, ресурсах, запасах твердых полезных ископаемых (Кодекс НАЭН). М., 2011.
  7. Смирнов В.И. Геология полезных ископаемых. М., 1976.
  8. Старостин В.И. Геология полезных ископаемых / В.И.Старостин, П.А.Игнатов. М., 2004.
  9. Четвериков Л.И. Понятия запаса, резерва и прогнозного ресурса полезного ископаемого // Вестник ВГУ, серия геологическая. 2002. № 6.
  10. Шарапов И.П. О подсчете запасов полезных ископаемых // Материалы симпозиума МОИП. М., 1989.
  11. Hoover Y.C. Principles of Mining. London – New York, 1909.

Similar articles

Determining of encumbranses on the territory of Kirovsky district of Saint Petersburg
2012 E. N. Bykova, Yu. V. Chernetskaya
Efficient application of laser scanning system
2012 E. A. Nesterenko
Application of laser scanning in the analysis of geometrical parameters object surface
2012 Yu. N. Kornilov, V. V. Kulesh
Use of hydrogeomechanical monitoring during shielding tunnel for underground station оf Saint Petersburg subway «Admiralteiskaya»
2012 Yu. A. Norvatov, I. B. Petrova, M. V. Sergutin
On cosmic rotation-pulsatory cycles of the earth and the natural-technogeneous status of objects in underground space under conditions of geodynamic instability and solar depression in 1982-2065
2012 B. G. Tarasov, E. K. Melnikov, L. V. Bugaenko
Hydrogeological conditions effect on safety of underground space expansion during transport tunnel construction
2012 R. E. Dashko, P. V. Kotyukov, A. V. Shidlovskaya