Submit an Article
Become a reviewer
Vol 241
Pages:
83
Download volume:

The relationship of fracture toughness coefficients and geophysical characteristics of rocks of hydrocarbon deposits

Authors:
Yu. A. Kashnikov1
S. G. Ashikhmin2
A. E. Kukhtinskii3
D. V. Shustov4
About authors
  • 1 — Perm national research polytechnic university
  • 2 — Perm national research polytechnic university
  • 3 — Perm national research polytechnic university
  • 4 — Perm national research polytechnic university
Date submitted:
2019-01-31
Date accepted:
2022-12-02
Date published:
2020-02-25

Abstract

This paper contains the results of laboratory tests to determine the fracture toughness coefficient K IC of rocks for terrigenous and carbonate objects by three methods. The tests were carried out by different methods due to the lack of a standard method for determining the fracture toughness characteristics of rocks in Russia. We used the following methods for determining the K IC coefficient: the extension of core specimens with an annular fracture, the action of a concentrated load on a beam specimen with a fracture and the method of bending semi-circular samples with a fracture according to ISRM recommendations. The paper presents the relationship of the fracture toughness coefficients with the P-wave velocity and porosity. The obtained dependencies characterize the general trend of changing for the studied parameter and can be used in the design of hydraulic fracturing in the fields for which tests were conducted.  

10.31897/pmi.2020.1.83
Go to volume 241

References

  1. Baklashov I.V. Deformation and destruction of rock masses. Мoscow: Nedra, 1988, p. 271 (in Russian).
  2. Braun U., Srouli Dzh. Tensile tests of high-strength metallic materials for flat deformation. Мoscow: Mir, 1972, p. 247 (in Russian).
  3. Parton V.Z., Morozov E.M. Mechanics of elastoplastic fracture. Мoscow: Nauka. 1985, p. 504 (in Russian).
  4. Handbook of stress intensity factors. Ed. by Yu.Murakami. In 2 vol. Мoscow: Mir, 1990 (in Russian).
  5. Ekonomides M., Olini R., Valko P. Unified hydraulic fracturing design: from theory to practice. Мoscow-Izhevsk: Institut kompyuternykh tekhnologii, 2007, p. 236 (in Russian).
  6. Roy D.G., Singh T.N., Kodikara J., Talukdar M. Correlating the mechanical and physical properties with mode-I fracture toughness of rocks. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering. 2017. Vol. 50, p. 1941-1946. DOI: 10.1007/s00603-017-1196-0
  7. Zhixi C., Mian C., Yan J., Rongzun H. Determination of rock fracture toughness and its relationship with acoustic velocity. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences. 1997. Vol. 34. Iss. 3-4, p. 49.el-49.ell. DOI: 10.1016/s1365-1609(97)00148-2
  8. Fowell R.J. Suggested method for determining mode I fracture toughness using cracked chevron notched Brazilian disc (CCNBD) specimens. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts. 1995. Vol. 32. Iss. 1, p. 57-64. DOI: 10.1016/0148-9062(94)00015-U
  9. Lim I.L., Johnston I.W., Choi S.K., Boland J.N. Fracture testing of a soft rock with semi-circular specimens under three-point loading, part 1-mode I. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts. 1994. Vol. 31. Iss. 3, p. 185-197. DOI: 10.1016/0148-9062(94)90464-2
  10. Kuruppu M.D., Obara Y., Ayatollahi M.R., Chong K.P., Funatsu T. ISRM-Suggested Method for Determining the Mode I Static Fracture Toughness Using Semi-Circular Bend Specimen. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering. 2013. Vol. 47. Iss. 1, p. 267-274. DOI: 10.1007/s00603-013-0422-7
  11. Ouchterlony F. Suggested methods for determining the fracture toughness of rock. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts. 1988. Vol. 25. Iss. 2, p. 71-96.
  12. Tutluoglu L., Keles C. Mode I fracture toughness determination with straight notched disk bending method. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences. 2011. Vol. 48. Iss. 8, p. 1248-1261. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2011.09.019

Similar articles

Methodology for Calculating the Stability of the Polymer Operating String in Permafrost
2020 V. A. Stetukha, I. I. Zheleznyak
Influence of parameters of delayed asphalt coking process on yield and quality of liquid and solid-phase products
2020 N. K. Kondrasheva, V. A. Rudko, M. Yu. Nazarenko, R. R. Gabdulkhakov
Assessment of operational reliability of quarry excavator-dump truck complexes
2020 V. M. Kurganov, M. V. Gryaznov, S. V. Kolobanov
Specifying the technical state limit value of the pump pulp without disassembling
2020 N. P. Ovchinnikov, V. V. Portnyagina, B. I. Dambuev
Biogeochemical assessment of soils and plants in industrial, residential and recreational areas of Saint Petersburg
2020 M. A. Pashkevich, J. Bech, V. A. Matveeva, A. V. Alekseenko
Investigation of the influence of the length of the intermediate magnetic circuit on the characteristics of magnetic gripper for robotic complexes of the mining industry
2020 K. D. Krestovnikov, E. O. Cherskikh, A. V. Saveliev