Production of calcium carbonate with tailored particle size characteristics as a factor in efficient recycling of gypsum-containing technogenic raw materials
Abstract
This study focuses on developing a method for utilizing phosphogypsum, a large-tonnage waste product from phosphate raw material processing, whose disposal sites are sources of complex negative impacts on the environment. As a promising approach to the utilization of gypsum-containing waste, the study considers the interaction of phosphogypsum with a sodium carbonate solution (carbonate conversion), which yields calcium carbonate, a marketable product referred to as phosphochalk. Existing technologies typically produce a fine-grained material, which hinders filtration and restricts the potential applications of phosphochalk. This study aims to determine the carbonate conversion parameters that enable the production of phosphochalk with tailored particle size characteristics while maintaining a high degree of feedstock conversion. A series of single-factor experiments was carried out to evaluate the influence of reaction conditions – temperature, Na2CO3 concentration in the carbonate solution, liquid-to-solid (L:S) ratio, and phase contact time – on the conversion of CaSO4·2H2O. The results showed that raising the conversion temperature to 90-100 °C and increasing the L:S ratio to 10 promote intensive nucleation of CaCO3 crystals and the formation of large agglomerates. A Na2CO3 concentration of 250 g/dm3 and a phase contact time of up to 3 h together yield phosphochalk with a particle size of D90 = 45 μm at a conversion degree of 98.8 %. In terms of its characteristics, the resulting product is suitable for use in the metallurgical industry as a raw material for flux production, which demonstrates its competitiveness in the secondary raw materials market. The recommendations developed in this work enable the design of a low-waste technology for processing technogenic raw materials, consistent with the principles of sustainable development and helping to reduce the environmental burden.
None
References
- Торочков Е.Л., Ряшко А.И. Вторичные ресурсы, образующиеся в химической промышленности // Энциклопедия технологий. Эволюция и сравнительный анализ ресурсной эффективности промышленных технологий. М.; СПб: Реноме, 2019. С. 801-821.
- Smirnov Y.D., Ivanov A.V. Investigation of Dust Transfer Processes During Loading and Unloading Operations Using Software Simulation // Journal of Ecological Engineering. 2018. Vol. 19. Iss. 4. P. 29-33. DOI: 10.12911/22998993/86146
- Pratap B., Mondal S., Rao B.H. Mechanical and durability analysis of geopolymer concrete incorporating bauxite residue, phosphogypsum, and ground granulated blast slag // Asian Journal of Civil Engineering. 2024. Vol. 25. Iss. 1. P. 317-326. DOI: 10.1007/s42107-023-00777-0
- Awad S., Essam M., Boukhriss A. et al. Properties, Purification, and Applications of Phosphogypsum: A Comprehensive Review Towards Circular Economy // Materials Circular Economy. 2024. Vol. 6. № 9. DOI: 10.1007/s42824-024-00100-5
- Pliaka M., Gaidajis G. Potential uses of phosphogypsum: A review // Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A. 2022. Vol. 57. Iss. 9. P. 746-763. DOI: 10.1080/10934529.2022.2105632
- Борисова Д.Д., Пашкевич М.А., Матвеева В.А. Использование затравочных материалов для очистки сточных дренажных вод от ионов фтора // Обогащение руд. 2025. № 3. С. 43-49. DOI: 10.17580/or.2025.03.08
- Петрова Т.А., Епишина А.Д. Оценка негативного воздействия рассолов калийных производств на почвенный покров путем моделирования процесса их разлива в естественных условиях // Устойчивое развитие горных территорий. 2025. Т. 17. № 2 (64). С. 616-626. DOI: 10.21177/1998-4502-2025-17-2-616-626
- Петров Д.С., Данилов А.С. Гидрохимическая характеристика и экологическое состояние водных экосистем в зоне влияния предприятия по производству минеральных удобрений // Горный журнал. 2023. № 9. С. 83-88. DOI: 10.17580/gzh.2023.09.12
- Bouargane B., Laaboubi K., Biyoune M.G. et al. Effective and innovative procedures to use phosphogypsum waste in different application domains: review of the environmental, economic challenges and life cycle assessment // Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management. 2023. Vol. 25. Iss. 3. P. 1288-1308. DOI: 10.1007/s10163-023-01617-8
- Saadaoui E., Ghazel N., Ben Romdhane C., Massoudi N. Phosphogypsum: potential uses and problems – a review // International Journal of Environmental Studies. 2017. Vol. 74. Iss. 4. P. 558-567. DOI: 10.1080/00207233.2017.1330582
- Zihao Jin, Baoguo Ma, Ying Su et al. Preparation of eco-friendly lightweight gypsum: Use of beta-hemihydrate phosphogypsum and expanded polystyrene particles // Construction and Building Materials. 2021. Vol. 297. № 123837. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123837
- Chernysh Y., Yakhnenko O., Chubur V., Roubík H. Phosphogypsum Recycling: A Review of Environmental Issues, Current Trends, and Prospects // Applied Sciences. 2021. Vol. 11. Iss. 4. № 1575. DOI: 10.3390/app11041575
- Solovyova V.M., Ilinova A.A. Complex use of mineral raw materials: formation of organizational and economic mechanism // E3S Web of Conferences. 2021. Vol. 266. № 06012. DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/202126606012
- Ivanov A.V., Smirnov Y.D., Petrov G.I. Investigation of Waste Properties of Subway Construction as a Potential Component of Soil Layer // Journal of Ecological Engineering. 2018. Vol. 19. Iss. 5. P. 59-69. DOI: 10.12911/22998993/91267
- Mattila H.-P., Zevenhoven R. Mineral Carbonation of Phosphogypsum Waste for Production of Useful Carbonate and Sulfate Salts // Frontiers in Energy Research. 2015. Vol. 3. № 48. DOI: 10.3389/fenrg.2015.00048
- Msila X., Billing D.G., Barnard W. Capture and storage of CO2 into waste phosphogypsum: the modified Merseburg process // Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy. 2016. Vol. 18. Iss. 8. P. 2709-2715. DOI: 10.1007/s10098-016-1157-4
- Ennaciri Y., Mouahid F.E., Bendriss A., Bettach M. Conversion of phosphogypsum to potassium sulfate and calcium carbonate in aqueous solution // MATEC Web of Conferences. 2013. Vol. 5. № 04006. DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/20130504006
- Shang Qing Lu, Pei Qiang Lan, Su Fang Wu. Preparation of Nano-CaCO3 from Phosphogypsum by Gas–Liquid–Solid Reaction for CO2 Sorption // Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 2016. Vol. 55. Iss. 38. P. 10172-10177. DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.6b02551
- Цветков П.С. Кластерный подход к улавливанию и транспортировке промышленного СО2: экономия за счет совместной инфраструктуры // Записки Горного института. 2025. Т. 275. С. 110-129.
- Stroykov G., Lebedev A., Belous A., Kolganova E. Achieving Sustainable Development Goals Through Hybrid Energy Supply Systems in Mining: The Case of the Varvarinskoye Copper-Gold Deposit // Resources. 2026. Vol. 15. Iss. 2. № 25. DOI: 10.3390/resources15020025
- Литвинова Т.Е., Сучков Д.В. Комплексный подход к утилизации техногенных отходов минерально-сырьевого комплекса // Горный информационно-аналитический бюллетень. 2022. № 6-1. С. 331-348. DOI: 10.25018/0236_1493_2022_61_0_331
- Teir S., Auvinen T., Said A. et al. Performance of Separation Processes for Precipitated Calcium Carbonate Produced with an Innovative Method from Steelmaking Slag and Carbon Dioxide // Frontiers in Energy Research. 2016. Vol. 4. № 6. DOI: 10.3389/fenrg.2016.00006
- Литвинова Т.Е., Сучков Д.В., Герасев С.А. Химически осажденный фосфомел (CaCO3) как полезный продукт утилизации фосфогипса // Управление техносферой. 2023. Т. 6. Вып. 3. С. 435-450. DOI: 10.34828/UdSU.2023.70.83.010
- Avşar C., Tümük D., Ertunç S., Gezerman A.O. A Review on Ammono-Carbonation Reactions: Focusing on the Merseburg Process // Chemical Review and Letters. 2022. Vol. 5. Iss. 1. P. 83-91. DOI: 10.22034/crl.2022.329067.1154
- Карапетян К.Г., Вершинина В.А. Обзор применения гексаметафосфата натрия в различных областях промышленности // Известия высших учебных заведений. Северо-Кавказский регион. Технические науки. 2023. Вып. 4. С. 149-156. DOI: 10.17213/1560-3644-2023-4-149-156
- Agayr K., Chanouri H., Achiou B. et al. Study on the kinetics of the conversion of Moroccan phosphogypsum into X2SO4 (X = Na, NH4) // Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management. 2022. Vol. 24. Iss. 5. P. 2015-2029. DOI: 10.1007/s10163-022-01461-2
- Danielik V., Fellner P., Jurišová J., Králik M. Kinetics of the conversion reaction of gypsum with ammonium carbonate // Chemical Papers. 2018. Vol. 72. Iss. 10. P. 2631-2639. DOI: 10.1007/s11696-018-0493-8
- Jiaojiao Hou, Zude Liu, Xiaoyang Ni. Unlocking the mysteries: Investigating the kinetic mechanism of calcium carbonate formation from phosphogypsum // Process Safety and Environmental Protection. 2024. Vol. 182. P. 625-637. DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2023.12.015
- Темиров Г.Б., Алимов У.К., Сейтназаров А.Р. и др. Реологические характеристики и состав продуктов конверсии фосфогипса с карбонатом натрия // Российский химический журнал. 2023. Т. 67. № 3. С. 25-35. DOI: 10.6060/rcj.2023673.4
- Матвеева В.А., Чукаева М.А., Семенова А.И. Получение смешанного коагулянта из отходов обогащения железной руды // Записки Горного института. 2024. Т. 267. С. 433-443.
- Пашкевич М.А., Патокин Д.А., Данилов А.С. Утилизация нитроцеллюлозосодержащих отходов химической промышленности с получением минеральных почвенных добавок // Экология и промышленность России. 2024. Т. 28. № 6. С. 10-17. DOI: 10.18412/1816-0395-2024-6-10-17
- Рудзиш Э., Петрова Т.А. Оценка применимости осадка сточных вод в качестве добавки к почве для рекультивации земель, образованных при добыче полезных ископаемых // Горный информационно-аналитический бюллетень. 2022. № 10-2. С. 127-134 (in English). DOI: 10.25018/0236_1493_2022_102_0_127
- Ennaciri Y., El Alaoui-Belghiti H., Bettach M. Comparative study of K2SO4 production by wet conversion from phosphogypsum and synthetic gypsum // Journal of Materials Research and Technology. 2019. Vol. 8. Iss. 3. P. 2586-2596. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.02.013
- Бажин В.Ю., Масько О.Н., Никитина Л.Н. Декарбонизация отходящих газов промышленных металлургических печей // Металлург. 2023. № 9. С. 121-128. DOI: 10.52351/00260827_2023_09_121
- Marinina O., Kirsanova N., Nevskaya M. Circular Economy Models in Industry: Developing a Conceptual Framework // Energies. 2022. Vol. 15. Iss. 24. № 9376. DOI: 10.3390/en15249376
- Bilal E., Bellefqih H., Bourgier V. et al. Phosphogypsum circular economy considerations: A critical review from more than 65 storage sites worldwide // Journal of Cleaner Production. 2023. Vol. 414. № 137561. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137561
- Lu Chen, Xiaoyu Luan, Feng Han et al. Life cycle environmental and economic assessment of Phosphogypsum utilization in China // Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 2025. Vol. 212. № 107938. DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.107938
- Yi Su, Yang Li, Wu Zhou et al. A green integrated process for phosphogypsum recycling: CO2 sequestration combined with SO2 recovery // Journal of Environmental Management. 2025. Vol. 373. № 123707. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123707
- Ming-Sheng Du, Bo Long, Yi-Zhe Mei et al. Toward zero-waste phosphogypsum valorization: Reengineered reverse-direct flotation synchronizes gypsum purification and functional co-products production // Chemical Engineering Journal. 2025. Vol. 517. № 164341. DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2025.164341