Comparison of the depth of exploration of ore bodies accessible by different electrical methods
Abstract
The question of the maximum depth at which electrical exploration can detect well-conducting ore bodies has attracted the attention of geophysicists since the very beginning of the development of geophysical methods. There are a number of statements about the depth of a number of electrical exploration methods using direct and low-frequency alternating current, sometimes supported by relevant data, and sometimes simply unfounded. However, comparing these data with each other and hence comparing the depth of different methods and choosing the deepest ones is difficult due to the heterogeneity of the conditions under which experimental data are obtained by different authors. This task is extremely important, since the direction of further scientific research in this area depends on its correct solution and even now, without developing new methods, the achievement of the maximum possible depths.
References
- Справочная книга геофизика-разведчика, вып. 4, Горно-Геолого-Нефтяное Издательство, 1934.
- Головицын В. Н. К вопросу о разведке глубокозалегающих рудных тел колчеданных месторождений методами электроразведки. Труды УФАН, вып. VI, ОНТИ, 1935.
- Нестеров Л. Я. К вопросу о глубине разведки методами постоянного тока (в связи с проблемой глубоких линз). «Геофизика». Сборник 9—10. Госгеолиздат, 1941.
- Воробьев М. В. Установление максимальных глубин разведки методом интенсивности. «Геофизика». Сборник 9—10. Госгеолиздат, 1941.
- Овчинников И. К. О глубине геофизической разведки колчеданных линз Урала. «Советская геология». Сборник 2. Госгеолиздат, 1944.