Vol 49 Iss. 3

One of the important problems in the theory of cognition is the question of the relationship between ordinary and theoretical (philosophical and scientific) consciousness. There is not a single philosophical system where the question of ordinary human perceptions and concepts, of trust or, on the contrary, of distrust in the so-called ordinary common human reasoning based on these perceptions and concepts is not touched upon.

The dialectical understanding of subject-object relations in cognition presupposes the recognition of the high epistemological activity of the subject. The understanding of the object is based on the fact that reality, sensuality is taken not in the form of contemplation, but “as human sensual activity, practice”.

Lenin's book “The Childish Disease of ‘Leftism’ in Communism” is an outstanding theoretical work, which summarizes the gigantic historical experience of the Bolshevik Party and the experience of the world communist movement. In his book, Lenin further developed the cardinal problems of Marxism - the doctrine of the dictatorship of the proletariat, the leading role of the Communist Party in the revolutionary struggle and the building of a new society, the position on the correlation between the international and the national in the labor movement, developed the strategy and tactics of the international communist movement in the new historical epoch.

Lenin's analysis of imperialism as the last stage of capitalism is of great importance not only for the labor movement, but also for the national liberation struggle. Lenin, for the first time in the history of Marxism, developed the basic provisions on the national and colonial question, which have programmatic significance for the entire world communist movement. In the modern period, Lenin's theory of national liberation revolution finds its further development in the Documents of the Meetings of Representatives of Communist and Workers' Parties, held in Moscow on November 14-16, 1957 and in November 1960, as well as in the Program of the CPSU, adopted by the XXII Congress.

The history of the Komsomol is inextricably linked with the heroic history of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, with the struggle of workers and peasants under the leadership of Lenin's party for the victory of socialism and communism. The Communist Party is the organizer and leader of the Komsomol. In the resolution of the Central Committee of the CPSU “On the 50th anniversary of the Komsomol and the tasks of communist education of young people” says: “From the first days of its existence, the Komsomol acted as an active revolutionary, creative force of Soviet society, a school for training convinced fighters for the cause of communism, took an important place in all political, economic and cultural life of the country”.

The history of the Leningrad Mining Institute is inextricably linked with the progressive and revolutionary movements of Russia in the XIX and early XX centuries. Mining students are represented in all three generations of Russian revolutionaries. The most remarkable thing in the revolutionary traditions of our Institute is that the best representatives of the mining student youth joined the Marxist movement in the years of Lenin's St. Petersburg “Union of Struggle for the Liberation of the Working Class” - “the rudiment of the revolutionary party, which is based on the labor movement, leads the class struggle of the proletariat, the struggle against capital and absolute government”.

The Great Patriotic War of the Soviet people against the Nazi invaders “was the largest military clash between socialism and the striking forces of imperialism”.

The essence of the socialist mode of economic management was formulated by Lenin in the work “The urgent tasks of Soviet power” and in a number of other works (“On the food tax”, “On the importance of gold now and after the complete victory of socialism”, in reports at the X and XI Congresses of the Party, in a speech at the VIII Moscow provincial party conference, etc.).

The practice of socialist and communist construction puts forward before economic science many new and complex tasks. And the more deeply the regularities of the development of the communist mode of production are studied, the more successfully these tasks will be solved.

The question of monopoly of the first kind in the mining industry and differential mining income is debatable in Soviet economic science, and the prices of different types of minerals are based on different economic principles.

At the end of March 1918, the Academy of Sciences appealed to the Soviet government with a proposal to involve scientists in the study of the natural wealth of the country. At a meeting of the Council of People's Commissars on April 12, 1918, a corresponding resolution was adopted.

The study of production relations, the economic basis of the developing countries should be based on a profound study of the nature, role and prospects for the development of the public sector.

Of all the variety of specific tasks that are being solved in the course of the implementation of economic reform, we can emphasize one common main problem - increasing the efficiency of social production.

More than 100 years ago, K. Marx and F. Engels, for the first time in the history of social thought, revealed the natural connection between the education and upbringing of the young generation with the mode of production and the way of life of the people of the social system in which this generation grows up. Studying the capitalist mode of production, they showed the class, bourgeois essence of education under the capitalist system and established that truly human upbringing, comprehensive development and education of the younger generation is possible only after the proletariat has won political power. They regarded the education, training and upbringing of the proletariat as an integral part of the struggle for socialism. “... .The most advanced workers, - wrote. K. Marx, - are quite aware that the future of their class, and, consequently, of humanity, depends entirely on the education of the rising working generation“.