Submit an Article
Become a reviewer
Vol 241
Pages:
118
Download volume:
RUS ENG

Priority parameters of physical processes in a rock mass when determining the safety of radioactive waste disposal

Authors:
V. S. Gupalo
About authors
  • National University of Science and Technology “MISiS”, Moscow
Date submitted:
2019-02-01
Date accepted:
2019-09-16
Date published:
2020-02-25

Abstract

Consideration of geodynamic, hydrogeochemical, erosion and other quantitative characteristics describing evolutionary processes in a rock mass is carried out when choosing a geological formation for the disposal of radioactive waste. However, the role of various process parameters is not equal for safety ensuring and additional percentages of measurement accuracy are far from always being of fundamental importance. This makes it necessary to identify various types of indicators of the geological environment that determine the safety of radioactive waste disposal for their detailed study in the conditions of the burial site. An approach is proposed to determine the priority indicators of physical processes in the rock mass that determine the safety of disposal of various types of radioactive waste and require increased attention (accuracy, frequency of measurements) when determining in-situ conditions. To identify such factors, we used the sensitivity analysis method that is a system change in the limits of variable values during security modeling in order to assess their impact on the final result and determine the role of various physical processes in ensuring safety. It is shown that the safety of isolation depends on various factors when burying "natural", "short-lived", and "long-lived" groups of nuclides. The factors that greatly affect safety when disposing of radioactive waste of these types are highlighted. The list of parameters of the geological environment that characterize the priority mechanisms of localization of various types of radionuclide contamination during burial and requiring the most detailed determination in full-scale conditions is defined.

10.31897/pmi.2020.1.118
Go to volume 241

References

  1. Abramov A.A., Beigul V.P. Creation of an underground research laboratory at the Yeniseisky site of the Nizhnekansky massif. URL: www.atomic-energy.ru/articles/2017/08/22/78690 (date of access 19.11.2018) (in Russian).
  2. Gupalo V.S. Evaluation of long-term changes in the filtration characteristics of the zone of technogenic and natural fracturing of underground facilities for high-level waste. Gornyi informatsionno-analiticheskii byulleten. 2017. N 12, p. 115-121. DOI: 10.25018/0236-1493-2017-12-0-115-121 (in Russian).
  3. The disposal of radioactive waste. Specific Safety Requirements No. SSR-5. IAEA Safety Standards. Vienna. IAEA, 2011, p. 104 (in Russian).
  4. Malkovskii V.I., Yudintsev S.V., Gupalo V.S. Isolation of solid radioactive waste in near-surface storage facilities. Materialy XIX mezhdunar. konf. «Fiziko-khimicheskie i petrofizicheskie issledovaniya v naukakh o Zemle». Moscow: IGEM RAN. 2018, p. 226-229 (in Russian).
  5. Linge I.I., Utkin S.S., Khamaza A.A., Sharafutdinov R.B. Experience in applying international requirements to justify the long-term safety of radioactive waste disposal facilities: problems and lessons. Atomnaya energiya. 2016. Vol. 120. N 4, p. 201-208 (in Russian).
  6. Alexander W., Reijonen H., McKinley I. Natural analogues: studies of geological processes relevant to radioactive waste disposal in deep geological repositories. Swiss Journal of Geosciences. Vol. 108. 2015, p. 75-100. DOI: 10.1007/s00015-015-0187-y
  7. Baghbanan A., Jing L. Hydraulic properties of fractured rock masses with correlated fracture length and aperture. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Science. 2007. Vol. 44(5), p. 704-719.
  8. Blechschmidt I., Vomvoris S. Underground research facilities and rock laboratories for the development of geological disposal concepts and repository systems. Geological Repository Systems for Safe Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuels and Radioactive Waste. Woodhead Pudlishing. Camdrige. 2010, p. 82-118.
  9. Birkholzer J., Houseworth J., Tsang C. Geologic disposal of high-level radioactive waste: Status, key issues, and trends. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 2012. Vol. 37, p. 79-106, DOI: 10.1146/annurev-environ-090611-143314
  10. ISTC PROJECT #307B-97 Development of quantitative criteria for suitability of rock mass for safe long-term storage of waste from weapons-grade plutonium production, illustrated by Krasnoyarsk mining chemical combine, 2001.
  11. Long-term safety for the final repository for spent nuclear fuel at Forsmark. Main report of the SR-Site project, Vol. I, II. SKB Technical Report. 2011, TR-11-01. URL: skb.se/upload/publications/pdf/TR-11-01_vol1.pdf
  12. Ohberg A., Rouhiainen P. Posiva groundwater flow measuring techniques. 2000. Posiva Reports. 2000-12, p. 87.
  13. Raven K., Sterling S., Avis J. Geoscientific site characterization plan for the deep geologic repository at the Bruce site, Kincardine, Ontario. Avis Intera Engineering Ltd. URL: www.opg.com/generating-power/nuclear/nuclear-waste-management/Deep-Geologic-Repository/Documents/HPD/4.3.55_geoscientificsitecharacter.pdf]
  14. Stober I., Bucher K. Hydraulic properties of the crystalline basement. Hydrogeology Journal. 2007. Vol. 15, p. 213-224.
  15. Min K., Rutqvist J., Tsang C., Jing L. Stress dependent permeability of fractured rock masses a numerical study. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Science. 2004. Vol. 41(7), p. 1191-1210.
  16. Tsang C., Neretnieks I., Tsang Y. Hydrologic issues associated with nuclear waste repositories. Water Resources Research. 2015. Vol. 51. Iss. 9, p. 6923-6972. DOI: org/10.1002/2015WR017641
  17. Underground Research Laboratories OECD/NEA 2013. N 78122.

Similar articles

Investigation of the influence of the length of the intermediate magnetic circuit on the characteristics of magnetic gripper for robotic complexes of the mining industry
2020 K. D. Krestovnikov, E. O. Cherskikh, A. V. Saveliev
Methodology for determining the parameters of drilling mode for directional straight sections of well using screw downhole motors
2020 Vladimir S. Litvinenko, M. V. Dvoinikov
The relationship of fracture toughness coefficients and geophysical characteristics of rocks of hydrocarbon deposits
2020 Yu. A. Kashnikov, S. G. Ashikhmin, A. E. Kukhtinskii, D. V. Shustov
Influence of parameters of delayed asphalt coking process on yield and quality of liquid and solid-phase products
2020 N. K. Kondrasheva, V. A. Rudko, M. Yu. Nazarenko, R. R. Gabdulkhakov
Mining excavator working equipment load forecasting according to a fuzzy-logistic model
2020 V. S. Velikanov
Prospects for industrial methane production in the mine n.a. V.M.Bazhanov using vertical surface wells
2020 V. R. Alabev, V. D. Ashihmin, O. V. Plaksienko, R. A. Tishin