Submit an Article
Become a reviewer
Vol 241
Pages:
118-124
Download volume:
RUS ENG

Priority parameters of physical processes in a rock mass when determining the safety of radioactive waste disposal

Authors:
V. S. Gupalo
About authors
  • National University of Science and Technology “MISiS”, Moscow
Date submitted:
2019-02-01
Date accepted:
2019-09-16
Date published:
2020-02-25

Abstract

Consideration of geodynamic, hydrogeochemical, erosion and other quantitative characteristics describing evolutionary processes in a rock mass is carried out when choosing a geological formation for the disposal of radioactive waste. However, the role of various process parameters is not equal for safety ensuring and additional percentages of measurement accuracy are far from always being of fundamental importance. This makes it necessary to identify various types of indicators of the geological environment that determine the safety of radioactive waste disposal for their detailed study in the conditions of the burial site. An approach is proposed to determine the priority indicators of physical processes in the rock mass that determine the safety of disposal of various types of radio active waste and require increased attention (accuracy, frequency of measurements) when determining in - situ conditions. To identify such factors, we used the sensitivity analysis method that is a system change in the limits of variable values during securty modeling in order to assess their impact on the final result and determine the role of various physical processes in ensuring safety.

Keywords:
radioactive waste burial modeling of radionuclide migration safety assessment relationship of filtration parameters and rock fracturing suitability of geological formations insulating properties of a rock mass
10.31897/pmi.2020.1.118
Go to volume 241

References

  1. Abramov A.A., Beigul V.P. Creation of an underground research laboratory at the Yeniseisky site of the Nizhnekansky massif. URL (date of access 19.11.2018) (in Russian).
  2. Gupalo V.S. Evaluation of long-term changes in the filtration characteristics of the zone of technogenic and natural fracturing of underground facilities for high-level waste. Gornyi informatsionno-analiticheskii byulleten. 2017. N 12, p. 115-121. DOI: 10.25018/0236-1493-2017-12-0-115-121 (in Russian).
  3. The disposal of radioactive waste. Specific Safety Requirements No. SSR-5. IAEA Safety Standards. Vienna. IAEA, 2011, p. 104 (in Russian).
  4. Malkovskii V.I., Yudintsev S.V., Gupalo V.S. Isolation of solid radioactive waste in near-surface storage facilities. Materialy XIX mezhdunar. konf. «Fiziko-khimicheskie i petrofizicheskie issledovaniya v naukakh o Zemle». Moscow: IGEM RAN. 2018, p. 226-229 (in Russian).
  5. Linge I.I., Utkin S.S., Khamaza A.A., Sharafutdinov R.B. Experience in applying international requirements to justify the long-term safety of radioactive waste disposal facilities: problems and lessons. Atomnaya energiya. 2016. Vol. 120. N 4, p. 201-208 (in Russian).
  6. Alexander W., Reijonen H., McKinley I. Natural analogues: studies of geological processes relevant to radioactive waste disposal in deep geological repositories. Swiss Journal of Geosciences. Vol. 108. 2015, p. 75-100. DOI: 10.1007/s00015-015-0187-y
  7. Baghbanan A., Jing L. Hydraulic properties of fractured rock masses with correlated fracture length and aperture. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Science. 2007. Vol. 44(5), p. 704-719.
  8. Blechschmidt I., Vomvoris S. Underground research facilities and rock laboratories for the development of geological disposal concepts and repository systems. Geological Repository Systems for Safe Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuels and Radioactive Waste. Woodhead Pudlishing. Camdrige. 2010, p. 82-118.
  9. Birkholzer J., Houseworth J., Tsang C. Geologic disposal of high-level radioactive waste: Status, key issues, and trends. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 2012. Vol. 37, p. 79-106, DOI: 10.1146/annurev-environ-090611-143314
  10. ISTC PROJECT #307B-97 Development of quantitative criteria for suitability of rock mass for safe long-term storage of waste from weapons-grade plutonium production, illustrated by Krasnoyarsk mining chemical combine, 2001.
  11. Long-term safety for the final repository for spent nuclear fuel at Forsmark. Main report of the SR-Site project, Vol. I, II. SKB Technical Report. 2011, TR-11-01. URL
  12. Ohberg A., Rouhiainen P. Posiva groundwater flow measuring techniques. 2000. Posiva Reports. 2000-12, p. 87.
  13. Raven K., Sterling S., Avis J. Geoscientific site characterization plan for the deep geologic repository at the Bruce site, Kincardine, Ontario. Avis Intera Engineering Ltd. URL
  14. Stober I., Bucher K. Hydraulic properties of the crystalline basement. Hydrogeology Journal. 2007. Vol. 15, p. 213-224.
  15. Min K., Rutqvist J., Tsang C., Jing L. Stress dependent permeability of fractured rock masses a numerical study. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Science. 2004. Vol. 41(7), p. 1191-1210.
  16. Tsang C., Neretnieks I., Tsang Y. Hydrologic issues associated with nuclear waste repositories. Water Resources Research. 2015. Vol. 51. Iss. 9, p. 6923-6972. DOI: org/10.1002/2015WR017641
  17. Underground Research Laboratories OECD/NEA 2013. N 78122.

Similar articles

Methodology for Calculating the Stability of the Polymer Operating String in Permafrost
2020 V. A. Stetukha, I. I. Zheleznyak
Mechanical Properties of Sandstone using non-Destructive Method
2020 H. Rajaoalison, A. Zlotkowski, G. Rambolamanana
The relationship of fracture toughness coefficients and geophysical characteristics of rocks of hydrocarbon deposits
2020 Yu. A. Kashnikov, S. G. Ashikhmin, A. E. Kukhtinskii, D. V. Shustov
Assessment of operational reliability of quarry excavator-dump truck complexes
2020 V. M. Kurganov, M. V. Gryaznov, S. V. Kolobanov
Specifying the technical state limit value of the pump pulp without disassembling
2020 N. P. Ovchinnikov, V. V. Portnyagina, B. I. Dambuev
Method for estimating the spectrum density of the resistance moment on the working body of a peat milling unit
2020 K. V. Fomin