On the compilation of tables for crystallochemical analysis
Abstract
I would like to note not only the diversity evident from these tables, important for crystallochemical analysis, but also the importance of the intermediate minimum that is observed for the principle numbers. It should be noted that in isotropic complexes, the distinction between tetragonal-like and trigonal-like disappears and, in general, crystals could be classified as pseudo-cubic. However, if we were to add genuine cubic crystals to them, we would obtain a special cluster of crystals for this particular gap, which would be an unfavorable factor for the analysis, and it turns out that just in this gap, some rarefaction in the distribution naturally occurs.
None