Submit an Article
Become a reviewer
Vol 22
Pages:
91-99
Download volume:
RUS
Article
Geology

Search criteria and signs for asbestos deposits

Authors:
P. M. Tatarinov
Date submitted:
1947-07-19
Date accepted:
1947-09-12
Date published:
1949-01-11

Abstract

The search for chrysotile asbestos deposits is facilitated by the constant confinement of deposits to certain rocks - to serpentinites. These rocks arise mainly by metamorphosis of ultramafic intrusive rocks and occasionally - by metamorphosis of dolomitized limestones, in both cases as a result of hydrothermal processes. Naturally, the search criteria and features for chrysotile asbestos deposits associated with serpentinized ultramafic rocks will be different than for deposits associated with serpentinized limestones. The most favorable parent rocks for industrially valuable anthophyllite-asbestos deposits are large- and coarse-grained pyroxenites, forming xenoliths within younger granite intrusions, especially those areas of pyroxenites that are cut by dikes of vein derivatives of granite magma.

Область исследования:
Geology
Go to volume 22

References

  1. Lodochnikov V. N. Serpentines and serpentinites. Proceedings of the Central Research Institute of Geology and Mineralogy, issue 38, 1936.
  2. Tatarinov P. M. On the methodology of prospecting and exploration of chrysotile-asbestos deposits. Materials on the methodology of prospecting and exploration of minerals. State Geological Prospecting Press, 1932.
  3. Tatarinov P. M., Kuznetsov V. A. and Filatov K. S. Geological studies in the area of ​​the Aktovrak chrysotile-asbestos deposit in the upper reaches of the Yenisei River. Proceedings of the Central Research Institute of Geology and Mineralogy, Issue 13, 1934.
  4. Tatarinov P. M. Asbestos. Course of non-metallic deposits. ONTI, 1934.
  5. Same author. Eastern strip of gabbro-periodotite intrusions of the Middle Urals. Petrography of the USSR, series I, issue 9, Publ. Academy of Sciences of the USSR, 1940.
  6. Same author. Structure of the ore field of the Bazhenov asbestos region. Proc. VSEGEI, Useful minerals, issue 4, 1938.
  7. Hall A. L. Aslestos in the Union of South Africa. Geol. Surv. of Union S. A. Mem. № 13, sec. ed., 1930.
  8. Cooke H. C. Thetford, Disraeli and eastern Half of Varwick map-areas, Quebec. Geol. Surv. of Canada, Mem. 211, № 2440, 1937.
  9. Keep T. E. Some practical hints in connection with chrysotile asbestos. Trans. of the geol. Soc. of S. Africa, v. XXXIII, 1931.
  10. Peacock M. A. The nature and origin on the amphibole asbestos of S. Africa. Amer. Min, № 13, 1928.
  11. Reinecke L. and Mс. Clure L. Variation in the Quality of Amosite Asbestos at Penge, Transvaal. Trans. Geol. Soc. of S. Africa, v. XXXVI, 1931.

Similar articles

New platinum minerals in copper-nickel sulphide ores
1949 I. N. Maslenitskii
Early Jurassic type of coal accumulation
1949 Yu. A. Zhemchuzhnikov
On the nature of changes in static forces of scraper winches
1949 L. F. Shklyarskii
Determination of the location of a vertical mine based on the minimum cost of underground and surface transport of minerals
1949 O. B. Bokii
On the boundaries of the region of stress variation in a hoisting rope
1949 I. P. Neronov
On the influence of the theodolite centering error at the apex of the connecting triangle on the accuracy of solving the adjoining problem using the Weisbach method
1949 V. A. Romanov