Submit an Article
Become a reviewer
Vol 22
Pages:
91-99
Download volume:
RUS
Article
Geology

Search criteria and signs for asbestos deposits

Authors:
P. M. Tatarinov
Date submitted:
1947-07-19
Date accepted:
1947-09-12
Date published:
1949-01-11

Abstract

The search for chrysotile asbestos deposits is facilitated by the constant confinement of deposits to certain rocks - to serpentinites. These rocks arise mainly by metamorphosis of ultramafic intrusive rocks and occasionally - by metamorphosis of dolomitized limestones, in both cases as a result of hydrothermal processes. Naturally, the search criteria and features for chrysotile asbestos deposits associated with serpentinized ultramafic rocks will be different than for deposits associated with serpentinized limestones. The most favorable parent rocks for industrially valuable anthophyllite-asbestos deposits are large- and coarse-grained pyroxenites, forming xenoliths within younger granite intrusions, especially those areas of pyroxenites that are cut by dikes of vein derivatives of granite magma.

Область исследования:
Geology
Go to volume 22

References

  1. Lodochnikov V. N. Serpentines and serpentinites. Proceedings of the Central Research Institute of Geology and Mineralogy, issue 38, 1936.
  2. Tatarinov P. M. On the methodology of prospecting and exploration of chrysotile-asbestos deposits. Materials on the methodology of prospecting and exploration of minerals. State Geological Prospecting Press, 1932.
  3. Tatarinov P. M., Kuznetsov V. A. and Filatov K. S. Geological studies in the area of ​​the Aktovrak chrysotile-asbestos deposit in the upper reaches of the Yenisei River. Proceedings of the Central Research Institute of Geology and Mineralogy, Issue 13, 1934.
  4. Tatarinov P. M. Asbestos. Course of non-metallic deposits. ONTI, 1934.
  5. Same author. Eastern strip of gabbro-periodotite intrusions of the Middle Urals. Petrography of the USSR, series I, issue 9, Publ. Academy of Sciences of the USSR, 1940.
  6. Same author. Structure of the ore field of the Bazhenov asbestos region. Proc. VSEGEI, Useful minerals, issue 4, 1938.
  7. Hall A. L. Aslestos in the Union of South Africa. Geol. Surv. of Union S. A. Mem. № 13, sec. ed., 1930.
  8. Cooke H. C. Thetford, Disraeli and eastern Half of Varwick map-areas, Quebec. Geol. Surv. of Canada, Mem. 211, № 2440, 1937.
  9. Keep T. E. Some practical hints in connection with chrysotile asbestos. Trans. of the geol. Soc. of S. Africa, v. XXXIII, 1931.
  10. Peacock M. A. The nature and origin on the amphibole asbestos of S. Africa. Amer. Min, № 13, 1928.
  11. Reinecke L. and Mс. Clure L. Variation in the Quality of Amosite Asbestos at Penge, Transvaal. Trans. Geol. Soc. of S. Africa, v. XXXVI, 1931.

Similar articles

The structure of tungsten deposits in Kukulbei and its environments
1949 I. M. Ozerov
Plications as a result of the process of internal movement of the substance of the layers during the plications process
1949 T. O. Zabokritskii
On some issues of the theory of mine electric locomotive haulage
1949 A. V. Rysev
Comprehensive analysis of physical and mechanical processes of mine hoisting
1949 G. M. Elanchik
On the issue of establishing intrusions in folded areas that preceded folding
1949 G. I. Sokratov
Determination of the location of a vertical mine based on the minimum cost of underground and surface transport of minerals
1949 O. B. Bokii