Submit an Article
Become a reviewer
Vol 243
Pages:
299-304
Download volume:
RUS ENG

Features of permeability anisotropy accounting in the hydrodynamic model

Authors:
Roman I. Yermekov1
Vitaly P. Merkulov2
Oksana S. Chernova3
Mikhail O. Korovin4
About authors
  • 1 — Postgraduate Student National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University
  • 2 — Ph.D. Leading Expert National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University
  • 3 — Ph.D., Dr.Sci. Leading Expert National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University
  • 4 — Ph.D. Engineer National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University
Date submitted:
2020-05-24
Date accepted:
2020-05-29
Date published:
2020-06-30

Abstract

Important step in the construction of a geological and hydrodynamic model is to set the correct properties of the formations and further adapt the model to the historical development data. Main source of information on the geological properties of reservoirs is well logging data. Paper describes the application of the method for post-interpretation processing of logging data, with the help of which the lateral anisotropy value of the field site is found. Brief discussion on the algorithm for adapting the hydrodynamic model to the parameters of the formation using one reference well is given. Feature of the logging data application to study the phenomenon of permeability anisotropy is that this type of research is widespread, has sufficient information content, and the geophysical system itself does not require the inclusion of specialized instruments. Based on geophysical study, a volumetric model of the properties for oil and gas bearing formation is constructed, from which the permeability distribution is used, whose gradient allows establishing the directions of improved and deteriorated filtration properties. As a result, during adaption of the model, it was possible to achieve a difference in reserves between the geological and hydrodynamic models of 2.4 %, which is an acceptable deviation for further calculations. It was found that the direction of improved filtration properties has a northeastern direction at an angle of 35°, and the value of lateral anisotropy is 2.2. Obtained results of lateral anisotropy, taking into account the data on values of vertical anisotropy, are included in the field model, where it is planned to further study the effect of permeability anisotropy on formation productivity.

Keywords:
permeability anisotropy anisotropy scale hydrodynamic modeling development system
10.31897/pmi.2020.0.299
Go to volume 243

References

  1. Korovin M.O. Specialized rock sample analysis to study the anisotropy of oil and gas reservoirs. Izvestiya Tomskogo politekhnicheskogo universiteta. 2014. Vol. 324. N 1, p. 87-92 (in Russian).
  2. Merkulov V.P., Aleksandrov D.V., Krasnoshchekova L.A., Nenakhov Yu.Ya. Lithological and petrophysical anisotropy of sandy-clay reservoirs of oil fields. Nauchno-tekhnicheskii vestnik YuKOS. Moscow: Izdatelskii dom “Neft i capital”, 2004. N 10, p. 33-36 (in Russian).
  3. Merkulov V.P., Krasnoshchekova L.A. Study of spatial lithological and petrophysical heterogeneity of productive reservoirs of oil and gas fields. Izvestiya Tomskogo politekhnicheskogo universiteta. 2002. Vol. 305. N 6, p. 296-303 (in Russian).
  4. Aleksandrov D.V., Merkulov V.P., Krasnoshchekova L.A., Martynova T.E., Nenakhov Yu.Ya. Methodology and results of studying the anisotropy of the Upper Jurassic reservoirs (on the example of Krapivinskoe hydrocarbon field). Geofizicheskie metody pri razvedke nedr i ekologicheskikh issledovaniyakh. Tomsk: Izd-vo TPU, 2003, p. 114-119 (in Russian).
  5. Pankov M.V., Belozerov V.B., Mangazeev P.V. Development analysis of Krapivinskoe oil field. Tsentr professionalnoi perepodgotovki spetsialistov neftegazovogo dela. Tomsk, 2004, p. 425 (in Russian).
  6. Petrel development. Field Development in Petrel. URL: http://sis.slb.ru/products/petrel/petrel_reservoir_engineering (date of access 05.08.2018 g.).
  7. Pyatibratov P.V., Aubakirov A.R. Assessment of the influence of formation anisotropy in permeability on the efficiency of cyclic flooding. Ekspozitsiya neft gaz. 2016. N 5, p. 35-37 (in Russian).
  8. Yakutseni V.P., Petrova Yu.E., Sukhanov A.A. Unconventional hydrocarbon resources – a reserve for replenishing the raw material base of oil and gas in Russia. Neftegazovaya geologiya. Teoriya i praktika. 2009. Vol. 4. N 1, p. 20 (in Russian).
  9. Ahmadi P., Malehmir A. Elastic Anisotropy of Deformation Zones – From Lab Measurements to Real Seismic Data, an Example from Eastern Sweden. London: 75th EAGE Conference & Exhibition incorporating SPE EUROPEC, January, 2013, London. DOI: 10.3997/2214-46.09.20130UK756
  10. Al-Hadrami Н.К., Teufel L.W. Influence of Permeability Anisotropy and Reservoir Heterogeneity on Optimization of Infill Drilling in Naturally Fractured Tight-Gas Mesaverde Sandstone Reservoirs, San Juan Basin. SPE Rocky Mountain Regional/Low Permeability Reservoirs Simposium and Exhibition, 12-15 March 2000, Denver, Colorado, USA. DOI: 10.2118/60295-MS
  11. Chen H.Y., Hidayati D.T., Teufel L.W. A Quick Method to Diagnose Flow Anisotropy Using Pressure Interference Data. SPE Rocky Mountain Regional/Low Permeability Reservoirs Symposium and Exhibition, 12-15 March 2000, Denver, Colorado, USA. DOI: 10.2118/60290-MS
  12. Chen H.Y., Teufel L.W. Timing and Distance of Well Interference in Anisotropic Reservoirs. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 29 September – 2 October, San Antonio, Texas, USA. DOI: 10.2118/774555-MS
  13. Fanchi J.R. Directional permeability. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 24-27 September, 2006, San Antonio, Texas, USA. DOI: 10.2118/102343-MS
  14. Makhnenko R.Y., Tarokh A. Anisotropy in the undrained pore pressure response of rock. 52nd US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, 17-20 June, 2018. Seattle, Washington, USA, p.7.
  15. Clavaud J.-B., Maineult A., Zamora M., Rasolofosaon P., Schlitter C. Permeability anisotropy and its relations with porous medium structure. Journal of geophysical research. 2008. Vol. 113. BO1202. DOI: 10.1029/2007JB005004
  16. Thomsen L.A. Fluid dependence of anisotropy parameters. 75th EAGE Conference & Exhibition incorporating SPE EUROPEC 2013, 10-13 June, 2013, London, UK. DOI: 10.3997/2214-4609.20130348

Similar articles

Methods for assessing the technical compatibility of heterogeneous elements within a technical system
2020 Sergey A. Vasin, Alexander S. Vasilev, Elena V. Plahotnikova
Revisiting the evolution of deformation zones under platform conditions in the case study of the Kungur Ice Cave (Cis-Urals)
2020 Nataliya V. Lavrova
Description of steady inflow of fluid to wells with different configurations and various partial drilling-in
2020 Valery A. Iktissanov
Multi-terminal dc grid overall control with modular multilevel converters
2020 Miguel Jiménez Carrizosa, Nikola Stankovic, Jean-Claude Vannier, Yaroslav E. Shklyarskiy, Aleksei I. Bardanov
Deep structure and geodynamic conditions of granitoid magmatism in the Eastern Russia
2020 Viktor I. Alekseev
Non-destructive testing of multilayer medium by the method of velocity of elastic waves hodograph
2020 Aleksandr I. Potapov, Artem V. Kondratev