Submit an Article
Become a reviewer
Vol 49 Iss. 2
Pages:
180-187
Download volume:
RUS
Article

On methods of determining the density of the exploration network

Authors:
E. O. Pogrebitzky
Date submitted:
1964-08-20
Date accepted:
1964-10-16
Date published:
1965-12-03

Abstract

The importance of the correct solution of the question of rational density of the exploration network does not require explanation. The literature devoted to it is extensive and is continuously being supplemented. The factors determining it are most clearly formulated in a general form by V. I. Smirnov [1957]. Many methods of calculating the necessary and sufficient number of exploration workings have been proposed and they continue to be developed. Usually the proposal of a new method is accompanied by a mention of previously proposed methods. But in the literature there is very rarely a systematic and comparative consideration of at least the best‑known methods of determining the rational density of the exploration network with respect to one and the same specific object. No one seems to object to the general statement that all methods of calculating the density of the exploration network are auxiliary to the geological method, but what this means exactly – nowhere is it clearly shown by anyone. Not surprisingly, there is no complete agreement even on the way to solve the problem. Usually, the practitioners determine the network density according to the tradition accepted at each field. If they take the path of theoretical calculations, they use several methods. The decision is made on the basis of sufficient convergence of the results of such calculations. At the same time, they are often given dogmatic value without proper geological analysis. Meanwhile, they can sometimes lead to errors and miscalculations. This article does not offer new ways to determine the density of the exploration network. By comparing a number of known methods in the conditions of a particular object, we are trying to establish the true value of each and the general way of solving the problem. It would be desirable to receive specific comments and suggestions on the question raised, in order to arrive finally at a generally accepted optimum solution.

Область исследования:
(Archived) Without section
Funding:

None

Go to volume 49

References

  1. Bogatsky V. V. Mathematical analysis of the exploration network. Gosgeoltekhizdat, 1963.
  2. Kazakovsky D. A. Estimation of accuracy of results in connection with germetrization and calculation of deposit reserves. Ugletekhizdat, 1948.
  3. Ogarkov V. S. Methodology of exploration of coal deposits of platform type. Gosgeoltekhizdat, 1961.
  4. Osetsky A. I. Indicator of conformity of the density of exploration points to the character of the exploration deposit. Trudy VNIMI, vol. XXX, 1956.
  5. Smirnov V. I. About the density of the exploration network. Sovetskaya geologiya, No. 58, 1957.
  6. Sharapov I. P. About determination of variability and endurance of mineral deposits. Razvedka nedr, No. 3, 1952.

Similar articles

Geological and industrial types of mica-bearing pegmatite deposits and their prospecting prerequisites
1965 A. V. Skropyshev
On the formation of quartz bodies and crystal nests in carbonate rocks
1965 A. I. Bochkarev
Remarks on the article by G. S. Porotov “ On the method of accounting for systematic error in determining the most reliable contents of components in ores”.
1965 B. Ya. Yufa
Geologic-mineralogical and crystallographic works of Lomonosov
1965 I. I. Shafranovsky
Some features of Late Upper Jurassic effusives of Priargunya and their metallogenic significance
1965 P. A. Strona, N. F. Kiseleva
Stratigraphy of Late Cretaceous sediments of the eastern part of the Olyutor Trough (Koryak Plateau)
1965 M. K. Kosko