Submit an Article
Become a reviewer
Vol 55 Iss. 2
Pages:
132-138
Download volume:
RUS
Article

Choice of the method of calculation of the average grade between two sections

Authors:
E. O. Pogrebitzky
V. I. Ternovoy
N. I. Rudenko
Date submitted:
1967-08-24
Date accepted:
1967-10-17
Date published:
1968-08-15

Abstract

In the practice of calculation of reserves the rule has taken root that if there is a correlation between the content of a useful component and some other parameter, the average content should be determined by the weighted average method, and if there is no correlation - by the arithmetic mean method. This point of view was first expressed by N. V. Volodomonov and later supported by P. L. Kallistov, V. I. Smirnov, V. M. Kreuter, V. I. Kuzmin and others. However, N. F. Zalata and A. A. Petrov strongly argue that the weighted average method is erroneous and recommend that the average content be determined only by the arithmetic mean method. In the last paper L. F. Zalata connects the method of determining the average content with the type of asymmetry of the distribution of the useful component. V. I. Borzunov believes that the weighted average method is applicable only in the case of changes in content along a hyperbolic curve. In other cases he recommends to apply the method of arithmetic mean. V. A. Petrov proves that the weighted average method of determining the average content in the predominant number of cases gives a more satisfactory result than the arithmetic mean method. Experimental studies carried out on models of ore bodies by I. A. Zimin and E. A. Zimin and E. M. Teplyakov, have shown that in some cases weighted average, and in other cases - arithmetic mean methods of determining the average content of ...

Область исследования:
(Archived) Without section
Go to volume 55

References

  1. Borzunov V. M. Geologo-industrial evaluation of non-metallic minerals. Nedra, 1965.
  2. Volodomonov N. V. On the method of calculating reserves of vein deposits. Mining Journal, No. 3-4, 1944.
  3. Zalata L. F. About disadvantages of application of the weighing method in determining average contents. Exploration and Protection of Subsoil, No. 4, 1959.
  4. Zalata L. F. About determination of average contents of useful components in ore. Exploration and Protection of Subsoil, No. 8, 1965.
  5. Zimin I.A., Teplyakov E.M. About calculation of metal reserves in blocks. Exploration and Protection of Subsoil, No. 9, 1966.
  6. Kallistov P. L. Asymmetry of distribution of some gold properties and related errors in determining reserves. In the collection: Mat. on the Geology of Gold and Platinum, iss. 9, Glavspetsvetmet, 1948.
  7. Kuzmin V. K. Conditions of application of weighted average formulas for calculating reserves. Exploration and Protection of Subsoil, No. 2, 1966.
  8. Pankul L. I., Zolotarev A. S. New formulas of average contents, areas and volumes for calculation of mineral reserves. Mining Journal, No. 1, 1935.
  9. Petrov A. A. About inapplicability of the weighting method for calculation of average contents. Exploration and Protection of Subsoil, No. 3, 1962.
  10. Petrov V. A. About application of the methods of arithmetic mean and weighted mean for calculation of average parameters for calculation of mineral reserves. Sov. Geology, No. 2, 1965.

Similar articles

Tectonic conditions of ore formation at Deputatskoye tin deposit
1968 Yu. V. Lir
Some features of formation of hydrothermally altered rocks of volcanogenic areas (propylites, secondary quartzites) and their prospecting significance
1968 S. V. Sendek
On some iss.s of evaluation of the Pikalevskoye limestone deposit
1968 P. D. Muzychenko
On the methodology of operational exploration at the Pikalevskoye deposit
1968 B. I. Laskatelev, P. D. Muzychenko
Determination of the reflectivity of minerals for the choice of optimal conditions of photographing at geological photo-documentation of mine workings
1968 G. A. Golovin, Yu. I. Bespalov
On conditions of formation and regularities of location of technical agate deposits in Transcaucasia (remarks to the article by P. B. Vainerman and A. S. Smirnova)
1968 N. A. Arkadiev, B. N. Sharonov