Submit an Article
Become a reviewer
T. V. Yalov
T. V. Yalov
Moscow State University
Moscow State University

Articles

Application of the modern electric exploratory technologies in prospecting of mineral deposits
  • Date submitted
    2012-07-29
  • Date accepted
    2012-09-15
  • Date published
    2013-01-01

Difference in galvanic and inductive methods' results, new examples for DIP and BIEP

Article preview

Difference in apparent resistivity values determined  in  galvanic and inductive  electrical and electromagnetic methods depends on macroanisotropy of layered cross-section and decreased penetration depth of galvanic methods without changing penetration depth of inductive methods. Joint influence of these two factors in case of high contrast of layers' resistivities results in difference in several tens of apparent resistivity values.

How to cite: Shevnin V.A., Bobachev A.A., Modin I.N., Yalov T.V. Difference in galvanic and inductive methods’ results, new examples for DIP and BIEP // Journal of Mining Institute. 2013. Vol. 200. p. 104.