Submit an Article
##plugins.design.becomeReviewer##
I. N. Modin
I. N. Modin
Ph.D., Dr.Sci., Professor
professor
Moscow State University
professor, Ph.D., Dr.Sci., Professor
Moscow State University

##plugins.design.author.coauthors##

##plugins.design.author.articles##

Article
  • Date submitted
    2012-07-29
  • Date accepted
    2012-09-15

Difference in galvanic and inductive methods' results, new examples for DIP and BIEP

##plugins.libra.common.readAbstract##

Difference in apparent resistivity values determined in galvanic and inductive electrical and electromagnetic methods depends on macroanisotropy of layered cross-section and decreased penetration depth of galvanic methods without changing penetration depth of inductive methods. Joint influence of these two factors in case of high contrast of layers' resistivities results in difference in several tens of apparent resistivity values.

##plugins.libra.common.howToCite## Shevnin V.A., Bobachev A.A., Modin I.N., Yalov T.V. Difference in galvanic and inductive methods’ results, new examples for DIP and BIEP // Journal of Mining Institute. 2013. Vol. 200. p. 104-107.