Submit an Article
Become a reviewer
Vol 160 Iss. 1
Pages:
27-29
Download volume:
RUS
Article

Genesis of the rhetorical category colloquiality: colloquial speech and small talk of A.S. Pushkin and his friendly circle

Authors:
I. A. Ivanchuk
About authors
  • North-West Academy of Public Service
Date submitted:
2004-06-06
Date accepted:
2004-07-05
Date published:
2004-12-27

Abstract

In the history of Russian literature and Russian literary language A.S. Pushkin plays the role of a powerful impulse that determined all subsequent directions of their development. Pushkin's reform of the literary language had a decisive influence on the development of literary language styles, it marked the first stage of the formation of the aesthetic and rhetorical category of colloquialism and thus created the foundation for the formation of an elitist type of speech culture, the most vivid embodiment of which was the linguistic personality of A.S. Pushkin himself. Therefore, the reference to the colloquial speech of A.S. Pushkin and his entourage is of fundamental importance for our study: it helps to clarify the nature of such an important category for rhetoric as colloquiality; to clarify the criteria of the expedient and permissible; to reveal the content of the cultural memory of modern speakers of elitist speech culture, the role of the traditions of Russian speech culture in their linguistic consciousness.

Область исследования:
(Archived) Rhetorical classics and the contemporary status of rhetoric
Go to volume 160

Similar articles

Types of rhetorical figures in modern church epistles
2004 I. Yu. Yarmulskaya
The subject of political rhetoric
2004 V. V. Danilina
From the experience of work on written scientific speech in practical classes of the course "Russian language and culture of speech" in technical universities
2004 M. N. Lavrova
American presidential rhetoric
2004 L. S. Chikileva
Etiquette speech behavior in the categories of "directness" vs. "indirectness"
2004 V. V. Dementev
Rhetoric in the system of trivium (to the problem of defining the concept of "rhetoric")
2004 M. N. Pryakhin