Transient electromagnetic soundings application for oil and gas investigation in Western Siberia
About authors
- 1 — Ph.D. associate professor Trofimuk Institute of Petroleum Geology and Geophysics SB of the RAS
- 2 — Ph.D. research assistant Trofimuk Institute of Petroleum Geology and Geophysics SB of the RAS
Abstract
Transient electromagnetic soundings with a controllable source (TEM) have been tested at performance of prospecting works for hydrocarbons in Western Siberia. During researches high resolution, depth of investigation, locality of research of TEM has been revealed at rather small sizes of installation (it is less than depth of investigated object). As a result of interpretation of TEM field data the map of depths to productive horizon (bajenov formation) on which it is allocated low-amplitude an anticlinal raising is constructed. On the basis of geological interpretation this raising is recognised by perspective on hydrocarbons.
Область исследования:
(Archived) Application of the modern electric exploratory technologies in prospecting of mineral deposits
Keywords:
transient electromagnetic soundings
Western Siberia
oil and gas investiga-tions
geoelectrical structure
bajenov formation
References
- Actual problems of oilfield basins. Novosibirsk: Publishing house of the NSU. 2003. P.8-43.
- Nevedrova N.N., Sanchaa A.M., Babushkin S.M.Geoelectric researches of oilfield perspective sites of the south of the Siberian platform // Proceedings of the Mining Institute. 2009. V.183. P.260-263.
- Khabinov O.G., Chalov I.A., Vlasov A.A., Antonov E.Yu. System of interpretation of transient electromagnetic sounding data EMS // Geo-Siberia-2009 / SGGA. Novosibirsk, 2009. P.108-113.
- Epov M.I., Dashevsky Yu.A., Yeltsov I.N. The automated system of electromagnetic sounding interpretation. Novosibirsk: Publishing house of the Institute of geology and geophysics SB AN. 1990.
Similar articles
Inspection of oil and gas wells casing by the method of electromagnetic flaw detection
2013 A. A. Miller, A. V. Miller, S. V. Stepanov, V. G. Sudnichnikov, E. M. Murzakov, O. M. Kazakova
Difference in galvanic and inductive methods' results, new examples for DIP and BIEP
2013 V. A. Shevnin, A. A. Bobachev, I. N. Modin, T. V. Yalov