Submit an Article
Become a reviewer
Vol 269
Pages:
700-707
Download volume:
RUS ENG

On peculiarities of composition and properties of ancient hydrocarbon source rocks

Authors:
Mariya A. Bolshakova1
Kseniya A. Sitar2
Dmitrii D. Kozhanov3
About authors
Date submitted:
2024-04-22
Date accepted:
2024-09-24
Date published:
2024-11-12

Abstract

Precambrian rocks are widespread within all continents of the Earth; that said, sedimentary associations of these deposits are of special interest in search for oil and gas fields. A wide range of paleontological, lithological and geochemical methods is utilized for conducting integrated geological-geochemical analysis and evaluating the initial hydrocarbon generating potential of organic matter of Precambrian source rocks. Investigated were peculiarities of depositional environments of the organic matter, specific features of its composition in sedimentary rocks and its generation characteristics. Own research efforts were performed in combination with generalization of other authors’ publications focused on Precambrian sequences enriched in organic matter – their occurrence, isotopic and biomarker characteristics and realization schemes of the hydrocarbon generation potential of Precambrian organic matter in the process of catagenesis. Geochemical peculiarities of initial organic matter are illustrated on various examples, type of the organic matter is determined together with the character of evolution of realization of its initial generation potential.

Keywords:
Proterozoic petroleum hydrocarbon source rocks organic matter petroleum basins
Go to volume 269

Introduction

Hydrocarbon source properties or petroleum generation potential of sedimentary rocks is an integral value that depends first of all on amount of organic matter (OM) in a rock and of quality thereof, i.e. on the genetic type of kerogen. Organic matter of Proterozoic rocks has a cognate initial biocenotic composition. Notwithstanding that seabed stromatolite-forming and brown algae appeared as early as in Early Riphean, the main role in forming the OM of Proterozoic rocks belongs to remains of planktonic cyanobacteria (Gloecapsamorpha) and acritarchs (Acritharcha) and bacteria [1]. This is the reason for a rather undiversified composition of the OM of ancient deposits – it is represented by sapropelites and oxidized varieties thereof – oxysapropelites. Sapropelic OM under various grades of oxidation is characteristic of practically all subdivisions of Precambrian. Hydrocarbon source rocks are present at various stratigraphic levels of Riphean. They are detected in Lower, Middle and Upper Riphean deposits in sedimentary and petroleum-bearing basins of practically all continents.

Some of the oldest hydrocarbon source rocks were found in Lower Riphean. These rock masses are represented by dark gray mudstone, mudstone-siltstone, siltstone-limestone, and clayey-dolomitic associations. Maximum concentrations of organic carbon in them vary within a wide range, reaching 6-7 % (as an example of source rocks of East Siberia [2, 3]). Early Riphean is characterized by dominance of prokaryotes, mainly cyanobacteria – seabed stromatolite-forming and planktonic ones, and other bacteria. There are encountered representatives of planktonic algae ascribed to Acritharcha, cyanobacteria Gloeocapsamorpha. In addition, in Lower Riphean deposits there are found remains of bottom algae looking similar to brown (?) algae Vendotaenia. It is probable that eukaryotic and even multicellular algae Phaeophita appeared as early as in Early Riphean [4]. Phytomycetes (fungi) are encountered in OM concentrates of Early Riphean. Remains of brown (?) along with blue-green algae are encountered in Middle and Upper Riphean deposits as well. In Middle and especially in Late Riphean, planktonic algae Acritarcha are widely developed, a part of them (unicellular with a nucleus) probably belong to the Chlorophita group [5].

In Middle Riphean sections preserved up to the present time, interval containing increased OM concentrations are also identified, they are characterized by high variability of not only organic carbon contents but also of degree of organic matter transformation. For example, in East Siberia to hydrocarbon source rocks belong dark-colored mudstones and marls of the Strelnaya-Gora, Derevnino and Nizhnyaya-Tunguska (Burovaya) formations encountered in Turukhansk district; those of the Shuntar formation of the Yenisei Ridge, and black clayey limestones and dolomites of the Malga formation in the Aldan-Maya trough in the east of the East Siberian platform. The highest OM contents are found in the Malga formation (organic carbon up to 5-8 % [5]). At that, carbon of kerogen of the Shuntar formation is the isotopic-lightest, while δ13CHOM values decrease in the westward direction from –26.0 to –26.3 ‰ (the Gorbilok-Glushikha zone) to –31.0 ‰ (the Kamenka zone), that reflecting a higher degree of OM catagenetic transformation in the first two zones [6]. In addition, in the Kuyumba district, in a number of wells there are penetrated dark gray clayey limestones, dolomites and marls of the Taiga formation in which organic matter concentration sometimes reaches 4.5 % (with average concentration of 0.25 %). In the southeast of the Siberian platform, rocks of the Khaiverga formation of Middle Riphean are represented by mud shales in the lower part and average concentration of organic carbon is 1.7, reaching 3.95 % in the area of the Khaiverga river.

Upper Riphean-Vendian hydrocarbon source rocks are also detected in the Proterozoic part of the section. Notwithstanding active manifestation of erosion events at postdepositional stages in basins within practically all continents, OM-enriched intervals are identified in remaining sections (parts of sections) of the said age. As compared with more ancient intervals, they are studied better (for example sedimentary basins of East Siberia [7], the Volga-Ural, Bohai, Amadeus, Carpentaria [8, 9], North Oman – Haushi and Shuaiba, South Oman – Rajasthan, Vindhyan [10], Kohat – Potwar, Mackenzie, etc.). In Upper Riphean in various parts of the Siberian platform, there are encountered terrigenous and less frequently carbonate rocks containing increased organic carbon concentrations in the Turukhansh district, Patom highland, within the Baikit anteclise (over there, the Iremeken formation is identified that is represented by black mudstones with a brownish hue in which organic carbon concentrations reach 8-9 %).

In Vendian, diversity of the organic world dramatically increases [11]. The Vendian biota includes a wide diversity of algae, non-skeletal and primitive skeletal Metazoa, represented mainly by tabular organisms. Non-skeletal Metazoa appeared as early as in Riphean, though neither remains nor casts thereof have been found up until now. There were found only trace fossils thereof that is explained by frangibility of their protective and integumental membranes [4]. However, in Vendian concentrates of dispersed organic matter, especially from rocks that are relatively enriched, those same cyanobacteria and to a lesser extent brown algae are prevalent [5].

By lithofacies depositional environments, development of various forms of hydrobionts and degree of their diagenetic transformation, two regions are identified in Vendian-Cambrian deposits of the Tunguska basin. Organic matter of mainly marine facies zone (the Igarka-Norilsk area) was formed largely from non-mineralizable algae, while in environments of salt-producing lagoons (most part of the Tunguska syneclise) – from mineralizable planktonic algae of the same classes. Presence of organic-matter enriched rocks in the Vendian section is most probably associated with the “Ediacaran” explosive development of biocenoses. Analysis of vertical zonation of organic-carbon enriched sequences reveals several intervals with increased OM content. At that, organic carbon concentrations are much higher than those recorded in Lower and Middle Riphean rocks. By data of [6], in the Baikit syneclise of East Siberia, organic carbon concentrations in black mudstones of the Tira formation reach 14 % (though they vary within a very wide range). In China, in rocks of the Datango formation (the Sichuan basin) organic carbon concentrations in some places reach 21 % [12, 13]. Such enriched levels of organic matter accumulation are presumably associated with planetary events, in particular with active manifestation of geodynamic processes [14].

The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate peculiarities of composition and petroleum-gene-rating properties of the most ancient organic matter and to somewhat enlarge the available understanding in the matter under consideration.

Results and discussion thereof

Peculiar features of chemical composition of Precambrian organic matter

The main bio-producers in the Precambrian were prokaryotes represented by bacteria, cyanobacteria and Archaea. Their development started approximately 3.8-3.7 billion years ago. The principal events that affected geochemical composition of that time organic matter are associated with development of the photosynthesis in prokaryotes [15-17], due to which fractioning and selective accumulation of light carbon isotope 12C in organisms and metabolites thereof took place. That is why lighted isotopic composition of carbon is observed in Precambrian deposits – 32-34 ‰ [18]. The appearance of eukaryotes approximately 2.7 billion years ago also affected individual geochemical composition of Precambrian organic matter. In addition to lighted isotopic composition of carbon, ancient organic matter is also characteristic of specific biomarker features, e.g. values of content ratios of steranes [19, 20] (tetracyclic hydrocarbons evolved from sterols produced by eukaryotes) and hopanes [21] (pentacyclic hydrocarbons built from lipids of cellular membranes synthesized by prokaryotes).

In the composition of organic matter of Precambrian sedimentary rocks of the earth (the McArthur basin, the Transvaal group, the East Siberian basin, etc.) hopanes prevail over steranes (Fig.1). This reflects wide development of microbial communities as well as the domination role thereof in the formation of initial organic matter of hydrocarbon source rocks.

Prevalence of steranes C29 over steranes C27 and C28 noted in many works [22-24] is also an attribute of Precambrian OM (Fig.2). In this case, such a feature that is usually characteristic of Type III organic matter is usually considered as associated with domination of green algae in the community of eukaryotic phytoplankton [25, 26]. Note that Type III organic matter is also determined for some Precambrian rocks by results of pyrolysis or elemental analysis of kerogen [27]. According to investigations in [28], this is associated with the fact that the initial organic matter contained a small amount of lipids, while deposition took place in oxidative marine and shallow-water marine environments. However, a part of organic matter (Types I, II, IIS) was accumulated in reducing marine environments. Thus, determining the type of initial organic matter of these ancient deposits is rather problematic. This phenomenon can be illustrated by results of stu-dies (Fig.3, 4).

Fig.1. Trigonogram of distribution of tri-, tetra- and pentacyclic hydrocarbons

Fig.2. Trigonogram of distribution of sterane hydrocarbons in Riphean-Vendian deposits

Specific alkanes characteristic of Precambrian organic matter are some methyl-alkanes. For example, 12- and 13-monomethyl-alkanes identified [29] in OM and oils of Precambrian deposits of East Siberia.

Such individual compounds were identified [30] also in oils of the Arah group (Oman). The hydrocarbons under consideration form two homologous series: 12-methyl-alkanes of the C24-C30 composition and 13-methyl-alkanes of the C26-C30 composition. One of the potential Precambrian markers is presence of branched mono- and dimethyl-alkanes [3] in the composition of saturated hydrocarbon fraction of organic matter whose appearance is apparently associated with specific bacteria of Early Ediacaran. In addition to the above-listed features of Precambrian organic matter, other attributes characteristic of Precambrian organic matter are discussed in publications (see Table). Thus, organic matter of Precambrian source rocks has specific characteristics of its composition: prevalence of steranes C29, presence of branched alkanes, prevalence of pentacyclic hydrocarbons over tricyclic and tetra-cyclic ones. Appearance of these features is in turn associated with a considerable contribution of bacteria in the composition of initial organic matter.

It is demonstrated that evaluation of the organic matter type in ancient deposits by pyrolysis is problematic. The Type III of organic matter determined by this method is probably associated first of all with postdepositional oxidation degree of the organic matter. At the same time, the initial organic matter according to data of chromato-mass-spectrometry and isotopic analysis of carbon had Type II of organic matter (marine, sapropelic).

Fundamental regularity in realization of hydrocarbon-generation potential of Precambrian organic matter

Ancient organic matter is often hydrogen-depleted in its elemental composition as compared with a typical Phanerozoic organic matter and is ascribed to Type III kerogen (see Fig.3). With the purpose of digital modeling of the formation of petroleum potential, software programs for basinal (geological-geochemical) modeling are utilized [31]. In such software programs, properties of organic matter of source rocks are described by means of three characteristics inherent with catagenetically unaltered rocks:

  • initial Total Organic Carbon content (TOC, wt.%) – measure of organic matter content in a rock;
  • initial Hydrogen Index (HI, mgHC/gTOC) of organic matter in hydrocarbon source rock – hydrocarbon generation potential of organic matter of a rock;
  • kinetic spectrum of kerogen destruction (the law describing generation of oil and gas by source rocks in catagenesis).

Fig.3. Pyrolytic characteristics of Riphean-Vendian deposits on the modified van Krevelen diagram

Fig.4. Pyrolytic characteristics of Riphean-Vendian deposits on the generation potential diagram

Molecular markers of Precambrian organic matter

Key characteristic

Source of organic matter

Source

Dominance of ethyl-cholestanes in the composition of steranes

Algae, cyanobacteria

[22]

High 24-isopropyl/n-propyl-cholestane ratio

Archaeocyatha

[32-34]

Prevalence of regular structures over regrouped ones,

αββ-isosteranes over ααα-steranes

[35]

Domination of C29 homologs in the composition of αββ-isosteranes

[35]

Prevalence of 18α(H)-neohopanes over 17α(H)-21β(H)-hopanes

Bacteria

[36]

Tricyclanes (∑Т) dominate in the composition of terpanes

[37]

Tricyclane index 2Т19-2023-26 <1

[37]

Prevalence of Hh35 homohopanes over Hh34

[37]

Domination of 2α-methylic series

Methylotrophic bacteria and cyanobacteria

[38]

Domination of 3β-methylic series

Bacteria of Acetobacter type

[38]

Presence of 2- and 3-methyl-substituted alkanes

Bacteria

[39]

One of the objectives of this research was to clear out whether or not the organic matter of Precambrian source rocks has similar generation characteristics; how does such organic matter realize its potential in the course of time in the capacity of classical sapropelic organic matter; whether or not hydrogen depletion affects the mechanism of realization of the potential of such organic matter in the process of catagenesis. This question is of utmost importance in the assessment of hydrocarbon potential of basins in which Proterozoic hydrocarbon systems are present, while publications answering this question are practically unavailable. In the libraries of commercial software packages for basinal modeling, there are no kinetic spectra of kerogen destruction obtained on samples of Proterozoic rocks. In the process of modeling, researches have to use the available possibilities to substitute data on such organic matter for “standard” kinetic spectra and it is a rather difficult solution in favor of which organic matter type one is to decide.

Proterozoic organic matter has already been attracting attention of geochemists for more than 50 years. During this time, researchers have shown that organic matter of this age generated oil and gas in various petroleum basins throughout the duration of geological history of our planet. There are next to none publications, which reflect kinetics of realization of Proterozoic organic matter. Such publications may be conditionally divided into two inadequate parts: the first – works in which researchers-geologists (dealing mainly in basinal geological-geochemical modeling) “synthesize” kinetics to model generation by Riphean-Vendian rocks relying upon common sense, results of standard pyrolytic assays and information on how the potential of such or another type of organic matter is realized. Most researchers have to use an approach of this kind. The second type of works is publications presenting results of author’s kinetic studies of organic matter-enriched Precambrian rocks [30, 40, 41].

For example, the paper [40] reflects results of experimental studies over a Riphean mudstone (the Iremeken formation of Upper Riphean, the Yurubcheskaya 104 well, 2182-2186 m, East Siberia) enriched in organic matter. The authors made a lot of interesting studies on this specimen – from hydropyrolysis in various versions to analyzing isotopic composition of carbon. The single-component kinetic spectrum was restored (Fig.5). The sample under study contains 12.6 % of organic carbon, hydrogen index is 463 mgHC/gTOC, Tmax = 445 ºC [40], i.e. the rock under study has already partly realized its generation potential that somewhat reduces the significance of this kinetics for utilizing thereof in digital modeling.

Fig.5. Kinetic spectrum of transformation of Late Riphean organic matter of the Iremeken formation, East Siberia, A = 5.3E + 13 [40]

Fig.6. Kinetic spectrum of organic matter transformation of Neoproterozoic – Early Cambrian rocks of South Oman, А = 1.1Е + 13 с–1 [30]

The obtained spectrum is characterized by maximum output of hydrocarbon fluids at activation energy of 54 kcal/mol. The pre-exponential factor (A) equals 5.3 1013 s–1. In the work [30], a sample of a catagenetically immature Neoproterozoic-Early Cambrian source rock from the South Oman basin was studied. The sample in question is characterized by a high organic matter potential, hydrogen index is 714.7 mgHC/gTOC. Organic matter in it is significantly enriched in hydrogen and belongs to Type I. The kinetic spectrum obtained in the paper [30] is presented in Fig.6.

Fig.7. Transformation coefficient versus temperature for Proterozic hydrocarbon source rocks and for organic matter of the “classical” organofacies

The lower activation energy for the maximum output of hydrocarbon fluids (50 kcal/mole for the Oman sample) may be associated both with the difference in maturity of the studied materials and with the fact that organic matter of the Siberian sample might be partly oxidized in the process of sediment diagenesis. The wide spectrum of energies at which transformation of organic matter takes place is probably associated with sulfur content of this organic matter that is mentioned by the authors of this research. Sulfur in the organic matter composition results in the fact that it becomes more chemically reactive and its transformation starts at earlier stages of catagenesis [42].

Regularities in organic matter transformation of Proterozoic source rocks are studied on rocks of the basins of Australia [41], studies are undertaken on numerous weakly altered catagenetically samples of Proterozoic age. Comparison is performed of variation of transformation coefficient of Proterozoic organic matter with the behavior of “standard” organic matter types (the types were selected by organofacies from the work [43]). In Fig.7, dotted line shows the change in transformation coefficient for source rocks from the basins of Australia and solid lines show transformation of “standard” organofacies of Oman (green line [30]) and of East Siberia (orange line [40]). It is seen in Fig.7 that notwithstanding the fact that a part of samples from Australia is enriched in Type III organic matter, all of the samples demonstrate transformation inherent in organic matter of sapropelic genesis. All of the variation trends of transformation coefficient of Precambrian organic matter are similar to the trends of sapropelic (or mixed) organic matter of organofacies A, B, and C.

Conclusion

The literature review and the own research do show that hydrocarbon source rocks are rather widespread in Proterozoic rocks. They were identified in various sedimentary basins of the world and may be confined to various stratigraphic subdivisions of Proterozoic.

Organic matter of Precambrian has the specificity of molecular-isotopic composition – in the soluble part of organic matter, specific methyl-alkanes, steranes C29 are identified, pentacyclic compounds dominate among cycloalkanes, isotopic composition of carbon is light as a rule.

Pyrolytic studies of Precambrian organic matter often lead to the fact that it is ascribed to the Type III (pseudohumic).

Generalization of the small in number investigations in the kinetics of Precambrian organic matter transformation makes it possible to conclude that the trend of its transformation in the process of catagenesis corresponds to the transformation trend of sapropelic organic matter (even for the oxysapropelic pseudohumic organic matter).

Upon the whole, Precambrian organic matter is characteristic of the scheme of transformation in the process of catagenesis similar to the regularity described in [43] for Type I organic matter (organfacies C).

References

  1. Summons R.E., Welander P.V., Gold D.A. Lipid biomarkers: molecular tools for illuminating the history of microbial life. Nature Reviews Microbiology. 2022. Vol. 20. Iss. 3, p.174-185. DOI: 1038/s41579-021-00636-2
  2. Fadeeva N.P., Morozov N.V., Bakay E.A., Frolov S.V. Geochemical background of Berezovsky depression oil and gas potential (Eastern Siberia). 2021. Vol. 23. N 2, p. 44-55 (in Russian). DOI: 10.18599/grs.2021.2.4
  3. Timoshina I.D., Boldushevskaya L.N. Geochemistry of neoprotherosoic organic matter in the southeast of the Siberian platform. 2020. Vol. 22. N 4, p. 41-54 (in Russian). DOI: 10.18599/grs.2020.4.41-54
  4. Dzevanovskii Yu.K. Precambrian, its boundaries and principles of breakdown. Journal of Mining Institute. 1969. Vol. 58. N 2, p. 9-15 (in Russian).
  5. Bazhenova T.K., Beletskaya S.N., Belyaeva L.S. et al. Organic geochemistry of Paleozoic and Prepaleozoic of the Siberian platform and prediction of oil and gas occurrence. Leningrad: Nedra, 1981, p. 211 (in Russian).
  6. Timoshina I.D. Geochemistry of Upper Cambrian organic matter of petroleum producing rocks and oils of the south of the Siberian platform. Novosibirsk: Izd-vo Sibirskogo otdeleniya RAN, filial “Geo”, 2005, p. 166 (in Russian).
  7. Kontorovich A.E. Evolution of oil generation in the Earth’s history. Russian Geology and Geophysics. Vol. 45. N 7, p. 784-802 (in Russian).
  8. Fengli Yang, Xiaofeng Zhou, Yuyang Hu et al. Neoproterozoic extensional basins and its control on the distribution of hydrocarbon source rocks in the Yangtze Craton, South China. Geosystems and Geoenvironment. 2022. Vol. Iss. 1. N 100015. DOI: 10.1016/j.geogeo.2021.100015
  9. Sanzhong Li, Xiyao Li, Guangzeng Wang et al. Global Meso-Neoproterozoic plate reconstruction and formation mechanism for Precambrian basins: Constraints from three cratons in China. Earth-Science Reviews. 2019. Vol. 198. DOI: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2019.102946
  10. Singh A.K., Chakraborty P.P. Geochemistry and hydrocarbon source rock potential of shales from the Palaeo-Mesoproterozoic Vindhyan Supergroup, central India. Energy Geoscience. 2023. Vol. 4. Iss. 3. N 100073. DOI: 10.1016/j.engeos.2021.10.007
  11. Bobrovskiy I., Hope J.M., Golubkova E., Brocks J.J. Food sources for the Ediacara biota communities. Nature Communications. 2020. Vol. 11. N 1261. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-15063-9
  12. Wenzhi Zhao, Suyun Hu, Zecheng Wang et al. Petroleum geological conditions and exploration importance of Proterozoic to Cambrian in China. Petroleum Exploration and Development. 2018. Vol. 45. Iss. 1, p. 1-14. DOI: 10.1016/S1876-3804(18)30001-6
  13. Dongya Zhu, Quanyou Liu, Jingbin Wang et al. Transition of seawater conditions favorable for development of microbial hydrocarbon source – Reservoir assemblage system in the Precambrian. Precambrian Research. 2022. Vol. 374. N 106649. DOI: 10.1016/j.precamres.2022.106649
  14. Ancient Supercontinents and the Paleogeography of Earth. Ed. by L.J.Pesonen, J.Salminen, S.-Å.Elming et al. Elsevier, 2021, p. 662. DOI: 10.1016/C2018-0-03855-4
  15. Zimorski V., Mentel M., Tielens A.G.M., Martin W.F. Energy metabolism in anaerobic eukaryotes and Earth’s late oxygenation. Free Radical Biology and Medicine. 2019. Vol. 140, p. 279-294. DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2019.03.030
  16. Qing Tang, Ke Pang, Xunlai Yuan, Shuhai Xiao. A one-billion-year-old multicellular chlorophyte. Nature Ecology & Evolution. 2020. Vol. 4. Iss. 4, p. 543-562. DOI: 10.1038/s41559-020-1122-9
  17. Kuznetsov V.G. Geochemical Environments of Precambrian Sedimentation. Lithology and Mineral Resources. Vol. 55. N 2, p. 99-110. DOI: 10.1134/S0024490220010034
  18. Sidorenko S.A., Sidorenko A.V. Organic matter in Precambrian sedimentary-metamorphic rocks. Moscow: Nauka, 1975, p. 114 (in Russian).
  19. Brocks J.J., Nettersheim B.J., Adam P. et al. Lost world of complex life and the late rise of the eukaryotic crown. Nature. 2023. Vol. 618. Iss. 7966, p. 767-773. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-023-06170-w
  20. Hallmann C., Nettersheim B.J., Brocks J.J. et al. Reply to: Sources of C30 steroid biomarkers in Neoproterozoic – Cambrian rocks and oils. Nature Ecology & Evolution. 2020. Vol. 4. Iss. 1, p. 37-39. DOI: 10.1038/s41559-019-1049-1
  21. van Maldegem L.M., Sansjofre P., Weijers J.W.H. et al. Bisnorgammacerane traces predatory pressure and the persistent rise of algal ecosystems after Snowball Earth. Nature Communications. 2019. N 10. N 476. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-08306-x
  22. Brocks J.J., Jarrett A.J.M., Sirantoine E. et al. The rise of algae in Cryogenian oceans and the emergence of animals. Nature. 2017. Vol. 548. Iss. 7669, p. 578-581. DOI: 10.1038/nature23457
  23. Kozhanov D.D., Bolshakova M.А. Assessment of the contribution of Precambrian deposits in forming the petroleum potential of the eastern part of the Volga-Urals basin using results of modeling. Journal of Mining Institute. Vol. 266, p. 199-217.
  24. Bazhenova O.K., Bazhenova T.K., Fadeeva N.P. Upper Proterozoic Formations of Russian Plate-Independent Petroleum Systems. 67th EAGE Conference & Exhibition, 13-16 June 2005, Madrid, Spain. European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, 2005. N cp-1-00262. DOI: 10.3997/2214-4609-pdb.1.P143
  25. Knoll A.H., Summons R.E., Waldbauer J.R., Zumberge J.E. Chapter 8 – The Geological Succession of Primary Producers in the Oceans. Evolution of Primary Producers in the Sea. Academic Press, 2007, p. 133-163. DOI: 10.1016/B978-012370518-1/50009-6
  26. Kodner R.B., Pearson A., Summons R.E., Knoll A.H. Sterols in red and green algae: quantification, phylogeny, and relevance for the interpretation of geologic steranes. Geobiology. 2008. Vol. 6. Iss. 4, p. 411-420. DOI: 10.1111/j.1472-4669.2008.00167.x
  27. McKirdy D.M. Organic geochemistry in Precambrian research. Precambrian Research. 1974. Vol. 1. Iss. 2, p. 75-137. DOI: 10.1016/0301-9268(74)90019-9
  28. Pehr K. Investigation of the Composition and Preservation Potential of Precambrian Sedimentary Organic Matter and Lipid Biosignatures: Dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Geological Sciences. Riverside, 2020, p. 188.
  29. Makushina V.M., Arefev O.A., Zabrodina M.N., Petrov Al.A. New relict alkanes of oils. Neftekhimiya. 1978. Vol. XVIII. N 6, p.847-854 (in Russian).
  30. Kowalewski I., Carpentier B., Huc A.-Y. et al. An unconventional Neoproterozoic – Early Cambrian source rock interval in southern Oman: Implications for oil and gas generation. GeoArabia. 2009. Vol. 14. N 4, p. 53-86. DOI: 10.2113/geoarabia140453
  31. Prishchepa O.M., Borovikov I.S., Grokhotov E.I. Oil and gas content of the understudied part in the northwest of the Timan-Pechora oil and gas province according to the results of basin modeling. Journal of Mining Institute. Vol. 247, p. 1-16. DOI: 10.31897/PMI.2021.1.8
  32. Bobrovskiy I., Hope J.M., Nettersheim B.J. et al. Algal origin of sponge sterane biomarkers negates the oldest evidence for animals in the rock record. Nature Ecology & Evolution. 2021. Vol. 5. Iss. 2, p. 165-168. DOI: 10.1038/s41559-020-01334-7
  33. Nettersheim B.J., Brocks J.J., Schwelm A. et al. Putative sponge biomarkers in unicellular Rhizaria question an early rise of animals. Nature Ecology & Evolution. 2019. Vol. 3. Iss. 4, p. 577-581. DOI: 10.1038/s41559-019-0806-5
  34. van Maldegem L.M., Nettersheim B.J., Leider A. et al. Geological alteration of Precambrian steroids mimics early animal signatures. Nature Ecology & Evolution. 2021. Vol. 5. Iss. 2, p.169-173. DOI: 10.1038/s41559-020-01336-5
  35. Dakhnova M.V., Zheglova T.P., Mozhegova S.V. Generation characteristics of organic matter and distribution of biomarkers in bitumens of the Riphean, Vendian, and Cambrian source rocks of the Siberian Platform. Russian Geology and Geophysics. Vol. 55. N 5-6, p. 755-762. DOI: 10.1016/j.rgg.2014.05.018
  36. Chao Li, Ping’an Peng, Guoying Sheng, Jiamo Fu. Precambrian organic matter. Chinese Science Bulletin. 2000. Vol. 45. Iss. 4, p. 295-303. DOI: 10.1007/BF02909757
  37. Kontorovich A.E., Timoshina I.D., Philiptsov Yu.A. Composition of biomarkers hydrocarbons in riphean oils of Baikit Oil and Gas Geology. 2011. N 5, p. 78-83 (in Russian).
  38. Summons R.E., Jahnke L.L. Identification of the methylhopanes in sediments and petroleum. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta. 1990. Vol. 54. Iss. 1, p. 247-251. DOI: 10.1016/0016-7037(90)90212-4
  39. Kissin Y.V. Catagenesis and composition of petroleum: Origin of n-alkanes and isoalkanes in petroleum crudes. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta. 1987. Vol. 51. Iss. 9, p. 2445-2457. DOI: 10.1016/0016-7037(87)90296-1
  40. Melenevsky V.N., Kontorovich A.E., Wuu-Liang Huang et al. Hydrothermal pyrolysis of organic matter in Riphean mudstone. Geochemistry International. Vol. 47. N 5, p. 476-484. DOI: 10.1134/S0016702909050048
  41. Jarrett  A., MacFarlane  S., Palu  T. et al.  Source rock geochemistry and petroleum systems of the greater McArthur Basin and links to other northern Australian Proterozoic basins. Annual Geoscience Exploration Seminar 2019 Proceedings, 20-21 March 2018, Alice Springs, Northern Territory of Australia. Darwin: NT Geological Survey, 2019, p. 92-105.
  42. Tissot B.P. Petroleum formation and occurrence. Moscow: Mir, 1981, p. 504.
  43. Pepper A.S., Corvi P.J. Simple kinetic models of petroleum formation. Part I: oil and gas generation from kerogen. Marine and Petroleum Geology. 1995. Vol. 12. Iss. 3, p. 291-319. DOI: 10.1016/0264-8172(95)98381-E

Similar articles

Критерии акустической эмиссии для анализа процесса разрушения горных пород и оценки формирования трещинных коллекторов на больших глубинах
2024 Vladimir L. Trushko, Aleksandr O. Rozanov, Malik M. Saitgaleev, Dmitrii N. Petrov, Mikhail D. Ilinov, Daniil A. Karmanskii, Aleksandr A. Selikhov
Geochemical studies of rocks of the Siberian igneous province and their role in the formation theory of unique platinum-copper-nickel deposits
2024 Nadezhda А. Krivolutskaya
The influence of ocean anoxia on conditions for the Domanik deposits formation
2024 Irina N. Plotnikova, Sergei B. Ostroukhov, Nikita V. Pronin
Promising reagents for the extraction of strategic metals from difficult-to-enrich mineral raw materials
2024 Tamara N. Matveeva, Nadezhda K. Gromova, Lyudmila B. Lantsova
Potential trace element markers of naphthogenesis processes: modeling and experimentation
2024 Tatyana N. Aleksandrova, Valentin V. Kuznetsov, Nadezhda V. Nikolaeva
Specific features of kinetics of thermal transformation of organic matter in Bazhenov and Domanik source rocks based on results of pyrolysis gas chromatography
2024 Svetlana V. Mozhegova, Roman S. Gerasimov, Irina L. Paizanskaya, Anna A. Alferova, Elizaveta M. Kravchenko