The structure of the ore field of the Bazhenov asbestos region as the most important criterion in the search for "blind" deposits
- канд. геол.-минерал. наук
Abstract
Study of the structure of the ore field of the Bazhenov asbestos region shows that when determining the possible location of "blind" deposits, one should primarily proceed from the tectonic elements of the structure. Lithological factors only narrow the area of chrysotile asbestos deposit searches, limiting it to the peridotite part of the ultrabasic rock massif. The connection of asbestos formation with weakly mineralized hydrothermal solutions leads to the exclusion from the search area of areas with intensive development of quartz-carbonate, talc-carbonate and talc rocks that arose under the influence of high-temperature, highly mineralized solutions of granite intrusion. Areas with predominant development of hydrothermal autometamorphism, the physical conditions of which usually do not correspond to the conditions for the formation of chrysotile asbestos, are also of little promise for exploration. After these exclusions, the area for searching for "blind" ore bodies still remains enormous. Specific localization points "blind" deposits can be identified only taking into account the presence of favorable and unfavorable combinations of tectonic faults and fault zones (see article). The main structural criteria for searching for "blind" deposits outlined in the article do not cover all the issues of the complex pattern of distribution of chrysotile asbestos deposits in the body of the Bazhenov massif of ultrabasic rocks, the knowledge of which can facilitate the search. Some of these issues are only touched upon in this work, while others can only be resolved after further accumulation of factual materials. These include issues of changes in the structure of the ore field with depth and searches for "blind" deposits of the second and subsequent tiers. It is necessary to study in detail the dependence of the localization of chrysotile asbestos deposits on the composition of primary rocks and changes in the physicochemical composition of hydrothermal solutions. The development of these issues is a necessary matter for the near future.
References
- Боуэн Н.Л. и Туттл О.Ф. Система MgO — SiО2— Н2О. Сб. «Вопросы физико-химии в минералогии и петрографии». Изд-во иностранной литературы, 1950, стр. 23—48.
- Лодочников В.Н. Серпентины и серпентиниты, Ильчирские и другие. Труды ЦНИГРИ, 1936, вып. 38.
- Сыромятников Ф.В. О синтезе серпентина. Труды совещания по экспериментальной минералогии и петрографии 26—28 апреля 1934 г. Изд. АН СССР, 1935.
- Татаринов П.М. Асбест. Курс нерудных месторождений. Ч. I. ОНТИ, 1934, стр. 177—203.
- Татаринов П.М. Восточная полоса габбро-перидотитовых интрузий Среднего Урала. Петрография СССР, серия I, вып. 9, ч. I. Изд. АН СССР, 1940.
- Татаринов П.М. Материалы к познанию месторождений хризотил-асбеста Баженовского района на Урале. Труды Геологического комитета, новая серия, 1928, вып. 185.
- Татаринов П.М. Поисковые критерии и признаки для месторождений асбеста. Записки Ленинградского горного института, 1948, т. XXII.
- Татаринов П.М. Структура рудного поля Баженовского асбестового района. Материалы ВСЕГЕИ, 1948, вып. 4.