Submit an Article
Become a reviewer
Application of the modern electric exploratory technologies in prospecting of mineral deposits

Difference in galvanic and inductive methods' results, new examples for DIP and BIEP

Authors:
V. A. Shevnin1
A. A. Bobachev2
I. N. Modin3
T. V. Yalov4
  • 1 — Moscow State University
  • 2 — Moscow State University
  • 3 — Moscow State University
  • 4 — Moscow State University
Date submitted:
2016-11-10
Date published:
2013-01-01

Abstract

Difference in apparent resistivity values determined  in  galvanic and inductive  electrical and electromagnetic methods depends on macroanisotropy of layered cross-section and decreased penetration depth of galvanic methods without changing penetration depth of inductive methods. Joint influence of these two factors in case of high contrast of layers' resistivities results in difference in several tens of apparent resistivity values.

Go to volume 200

Similar articles

Georadar researches of structural features and water cutting of overburden rocks for coal open-cast mining
2013 G. A. Kulyandin, A. V. Omel'yanenko, L. L. Fedorova
Explication of the «boundary» concept in stratigraphy
2013 V. P. Matveev
Hydrocarbon systems of Siberian platform
2013 V. B. Archegov